Offset tweeter instead coaxially mounted, to decrease intermodulation distortion. In spite of relatively wide tweeter mounting plate in front of the woofer, measured frequency response is superbly flat.
Could it be that the mounting plate also increases the woofers dispersion near the crossover point?
Might be, partial midbass covering is used in a number of line-arrays, but mostly as an extension of the compression drivers horn.
im interested because geithain is definitely one of the most reknown speakers for mixing purpose. real transparent, and its the only company that has done this. so there design definitely works..
How about RL901K clone?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8qejWMKazmc
looks like just naked tweeter and midrange assebled front of woofer
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8qejWMKazmc
looks like just naked tweeter and midrange assebled front of woofer
Thanks for the clip manninen.
It may be possible that the plate be used as an acoustic crossover for the woofer.
It may be possible that the plate be used as an acoustic crossover for the woofer.
Ok, I watched without sound so I didn't know that, but I have seen an acoustic crossover done that way, without the tweeter.
Yea i think it have to be open, not closed. there seems to be some damping.
But why there isn´t any clones?
But why there isn´t any clones?
They seem to have it arranged like that to allow the same tweeter mounting plate be used in their single, dual and triple tweeter arrays without having to make too many changes in their parts for cost control.
The single tweeter mounted offset helps with diffraction as opposed to a center mount.
The single tweeter mounted offset helps with diffraction as opposed to a center mount.
- Status
- Not open for further replies.