Funniest snake oil theories

Status
Not open for further replies.
From the looks of the datasheet, it seems they are only useful for rf filtering. Since they are listed under a few NRTL's, they are certainly safe and useful. But I was thinking only about audio frequencies.

I recall one choke that was 4 millihenries at low levels, and saturated like crazy at the ampere level because the ferrite was very small. In principle, that would fit the need quite well. But I do not think it is approved in the USA for use in the safety bonding circuit yet.
jn

Thanks for your reply.

This particular unit is approved to UL1283. The scope is "These requirements cover electromagnetic interference (EMI) filters installed on, or connected to, 1000 V or lower potential circuits, 50 - 60 Hz, or up to 1500V dc, and installed in accordance with the National Electrical Code".

Not being based in the US I am not overly familiar with the NEC so I don't know if that scope statement implies they would meet the safety bonding requirement.

I take your point that, by definition, if the earth line choke has sufficient impedance to be effective at isolating the 50Hz ground loop currents then it could not pass the safety bonding requirement.

The two variants use 0.4mH and 0.1mH which have an impedance of 0.15 and 0.04 Ohms at 60Hz so they might comply with that requirement

My application is the nasty world of EM compliance - this style of filter is a useful addition to the armory.
 
Thanks for your reply.

This particular unit is approved to UL1283. The scope is "These requirements cover electromagnetic interference (EMI) filters installed on, or connected to, 1000 V or lower potential circuits, 50 - 60 Hz, or up to 1500V dc, and installed in accordance with the National Electrical Code".

Not being based in the US I am not overly familiar with the NEC so I don't know if that scope statement implies they would meet the safety bonding requirement.

I take your point that, by definition, if the earth line choke has sufficient impedance to be effective at isolating the 50Hz ground loop currents then it could not pass the safety bonding requirement.

The two variants use 0.4mH and 0.1mH which have an impedance of 0.15 and 0.04 Ohms at 60Hz so they might comply with that requirement

My application is the nasty world of EM compliance - this style of filter is a useful addition to the armory.

I'm definitely considering them for my next project. Thanks for the heads up.

John
 
Notice the rejection plots. Rejection below about 20KHz is going to be low which means line harmonics won't see much rejection.

They are helpful for AM radio and some brands extend the plots up into the hundreds of MHz which shows they may be good for FM and some TV rejection.
 
Notice the rejection plots. Rejection below about 20KHz is going to be low which means line harmonics won't see much rejection.

They are helpful for AM radio and some brands extend the plots up into the hundreds of MHz which shows they may be good for FM and some TV rejection.

Yup. I need new IEC's for an app that has a D amp, so figured to use one to keep hash at bay.

But yes, it will do nothing for ground loop induction in the audio band.

jn
 
They might compete with what Dave makes. They probably have an inferior cabinet construction, but their drivers are first class. Of course, I could hardly afford them, myself, so I am deeply grateful that Dave gave me the Sashas. Dave's cabinets are magnificent!
 
The second paragraph I am getting a bit sick of hearing...its a hand waving statement that is getting to me a lot, i never said any such thing, i have spent years of my life working on system where auditability and hearing protection are critical, i am aware of what distortions electronic systems can add. You cannot strip noise from a signal, it looks exactly like a signal, you can limit the amount of noise a system adds to a signal, but audible noise and an audible signal are the same. The claim is that MP3s sound like uncompressed audio, therefore something has to be added to pad out the sound, noise. If you removed the noise the MP3s presentation would be even more starker and noticeable as compressed audio. That's how the universe works, that's how physics works.
Hang loose, man ... 😛

MP3's are the whipping boys of music, like Bose in manufacturing, 😀. My personal experience is that if they are competently encoded, at high bit rates, and decoded into uncompressed files before playing, that they are highly satisfactory as music tracks - but if you deal with them as a junk medium, then that's exactly what they will sound like ... enter, from stage right, the Compact Cassette ...

Noise is never stripped from the source signal, unless you throw lots of DSP at the exercise - but you aim to improve the ability of the playback system to render the subjective impact of that noise to be as little as possible. IME, this can be done ..
 
Last edited:
Just get me a pair of JBL M2 Reference Monitor speakers and I will be most happy! '-)
I heard a pair of ambitious JBL home audio speakers, driven by Accuphase amplification, at that hifi show and was quite surprised by its poor showing: at low levels it was quite reasonable, but once decent volume levels were called for it became quite shouty, it was rapidly heading into typical PA territory ...
 
Thanks for your reply.

This particular unit is approved to UL1283. The scope is "These requirements cover electromagnetic interference (EMI) filters installed on, or connected to, 1000 V or lower potential circuits, 50 - 60 Hz, or up to 1500V dc, and installed in accordance with the National Electrical Code".

Not being based in the US I am not overly familiar with the NEC so I don't know if that scope statement implies they would meet the safety bonding requirement.

I take your point that, by definition, if the earth line choke has sufficient impedance to be effective at isolating the 50Hz ground loop currents then it could not pass the safety bonding requirement.

The two variants use 0.4mH and 0.1mH which have an impedance of 0.15 and 0.04 Ohms at 60Hz so they might comply with that requirement

My application is the nasty world of EM compliance - this style of filter is a useful addition to the armory.

I'm definitely considering them for my next project. Thanks for the heads up.

John

On equipment that I install it utilises chokes on the ground similar to what you explained. The purpose is to arrest transients generated from high current contactors when the coil is energized or de energized. The transients cause the digital control boards to reset. Placing the chokes eliminates this. The machinery has passed UL standards with the chokes in place. Think the value is 4 mH.

Anyway, my point is that the machined is manufactured in Germany and connected in the US. UL standards govern this, not NEC. NEC is for building codes and what is installed in buildings for safety, not machinery or appliances.

I would use them with no problem for chassis to ground isolation. It is still a direct connection to ground for short circuit protection and absorbs undesired noise from ground loops and transients.
 
I have heard JBL's sound as good as anything at a CES show, and for the money, they are a real bargain. But they have to be full size with the highest quality drivers that they know how to make.
Now, REAL LOUD, like Grateful Dead levels, perhaps Meyersound would be a better choice.
 
In principle, I totally agree. But in the world of audio, nothing is steady state. His test is good for only one aspect, whereas the issue is far more complex.

Jim's test appears to be a simple phasor type test, I believe it would work just as well using two sines with zero crossing detection, assuming amplitude is normalized. The problem I see is what happens when two frequencies are present. For example, a 50 hz carrier with a 5Khz rider. Every 20 milliseconds, the output current is fed from an opposite rail, so internal chassis currents are taking a different path. A bad star setup or wiring layout changes the e/m scene. If the simple class B design has a different phase shift for the hf based on output quadrant voltage/current, Jim's technique is not designed to look at it.

But it is a good technique.
Thanks for your explanation - your reasoning is clearer to me now



For IC's, the input impedance of the load is relatively constant. T-line considerations only come into play when the load impedance swings wildly, like a speaker.
Yes, I forgot the impedance swings of the speaker interaction with the speaker cable impedance in theory accounted for the small timing differences in the speaker ramp up time for different frequencies across the audio range.
 
I have heard JBL's sound as good as anything at a CES show, and for the money, they are a real bargain. But they have to be full size with the highest quality drivers that they know how to make.
Correction, they weren't home audio products - JBL’s 4429 Studio Monitors were the ones. We're not talking ear-shredding levels - just at reasonable SPLs, getting closer to an acoustic instrument's output.
 
Of possible interest ... I came across this review in a pro sound website, of Westlake speakers which apparently were one of the first to get the full PE distortion treatment:

As L-R only playback, the Lc265.1Vs have a remarkably smooth, natural sound for any kind of music. There is no hype with these speakers. Imaging is good, and, for the pro, the off axis response makes for an easy monitoring job from almost any angle or the dead center of the sweet spot.

My acoustic recordings sounded excellent with the Westlake, reproducing the warm resonant Martin tone with no edge in the low treble. These speakers are smooth. Bass is tight and will extend down to 50 Hz or so in my room.

One things about all the Westlake speakers is that designer Glenn Phoenix has been working on lowering speaker distortion through the cable design, careful crossover selection and premium drivers. The end result is a clean sounding speaker -- even at loud levels. Engineers doing dynamic audio mixing for 5.1 cinema can crank these babies up yet still receive less ear fatigue through long-term listening than other speakers.
These are the sort of things I can't say about those JBLs I heard ...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.