Free Energy devices

Status
Not open for further replies.
Jump to Latest
#781
I had a psychic experience once.

I was in Tokyo in an alley where "psychics" set up small tables with candles and sit there with very calm, all-knowing-all seeing expressions on their faces, and will tell your future for a price. Anyway, I was there with a couple friends and we had all been drinking. As I recall, we were playing with some fireworks, you know, the way drunks will, lighting them and throwing them at each other, laughing loudly and generally annoying bystanders. So I lit a firecracker and threw it at one of my friends. He dodged it and it landed on one of the psychic's tables and exploded. The psychic got angry and started swearing at us, so we moved on.

Later, on the train home, I was thinking about it and it occurred to me that that psychic should have know what was going to happen there and placed his table a few feet to the left or right. It was HIS fault, after all, because he knew what was going to happen - I sure didn't.

I_F
 
#782
KBK said:

It will not go away either, as the bulk of humanity does belive in in it, either religiously (does no-one any favors) or casually..or even attempts to properly scientifically scrutinize it. Science seems to have it on the back burner..a very remote back burner, and is concentrating on other things. The problem is that the areas that cutting edge physics are attempting to go into, like dealing with action t a distance, and superstring theories, etc, surrounding this point, fall squarely into the lap of these sorts of psychic phenomena. A tough spot -- to be sure. Shrodigner, alternate futures, dimensions, etc..all fall into this catagory of psychic phenomena..and those involved in it..have known about and experienced these things in the casual and human sense.. for millenia.
Click to expand...

You're making a logical error. You are assuming that your so called "psychic phenomena" is the SAME THING that physicists are studying when in fact they are studying other things that to the layman appear to be similar or the same as psychic phenomena.

The sky is blue and someone's eyes are blue. You are focusing on the "blueness" and assuming there is some relationship there. One must cause the other, or they must both be blue for the same reason. This is obviously incorrect.

The fact that many people are ignorant or suffer delusions and have done so for thousands of years is no proof of correctness. It is merely proof of the foolishness of some, the tragic ignorance of others and the unfortunate weakness of still others. Fortunately, the work of scientists eventually puts an end to or reduces the ignorance. Not much can be done for the delusional, I'm afraid.

I_F
 
#786
Well, most scientists assume the moon is there when nobody is looking at it.

How do they know?

And, no, I do not believe in the psychic or the mind/spirit/soul. The separation of body and mind/spirit/soul is a construction--a belief.

All beliefs are based on want.
 
#794
If you have a problem with those you have a problem with Internet boards and forums.
Click to expand...

I beg your indulgence for having committed the great sin of a spelling mistake. Can you find it in your heart to forgive me?

I will promise to strive to never let it occur again.

I feel just awful to have not reviewed my posting before sending it to this illustriuos board, whose members I beg humbly to forgive my trespasses as well.

I am sure your combined intellectual capacity will let you manage to add the offending, because missing, "a".

Any further spelling mistakes I kindly ask to overlook, as I am sure my inferior intellect will manage to produce a few more of these.

I am also sure that the nations north of germany provide a much better education than what I have received attending school in said country, so all I can do is ask humbly to accept my apology.
 
#795
An externally hosted image should be here but it was not working when we last tested it.



and here the offending "digram". Let me again apologize profusely for this unconsciounable error in my posting.

I just hope that my humble apologies will not be misconstrued as "sneering" at the obvious supremacy of the previous poster(s).
I can assure you that my squirming with all the attendend marks in the sand in which I proceeded to do such, was meant honestly and with a straightforwardness not usual to my character.
 
#797
here's a thought

If one has any over-unity devixce (sic), why not build a feedback loop from output to the input, thereby reducing the need for input power to zero or below... thus eliminating the need for any input power at all...
(i'm sure no one has thought of THIS b4, eh?):devilr:

One would then have an infinite energy devixce (sic), and all the world's problems would be solved.😉 😉

One wonders why the psychic friends network we all grew to love on late nite teevee a decade or so ago couldn't predict their own demise????
 
#799
Impressive drawing, there. Quite literate. There are quacks everywhere. As you may feel, some of you..etc. Do we have a finger pointing icon of some sort? I'm sure a few of you guys would point it at me. Kettles'n'pots and all that stuff.
 
#800
I_Forgot said:


You're making a logical error. You are assuming that your so called "psychic phenomena" is the SAME THING that physicists are studying when in fact they are studying other things that to the layman appear to be similar or the same as psychic phenomena.

I_F
Click to expand...

I'm afraid you are making a wrong conclusion from my post. Communication being what it is. At least we attempt to comunicate.


In my defence, I see you as the layman, or in this case, the uninformed layman on the subject of psychic phenomena, and it's connections to the sciences mentioned. Spend a few years on the subject in an honest and truthful manner. You might end up feeling differently.

I won't throw barbs or attempt to make a sneering remark about the outcome or your thoughts on such, in my small post here, it would be...dishonest and leading, ie, putting words in your mouth.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom