Free Energy for Real
Google Joe Cell. I saw these things working in the 70's. Not new just suppressed. I hear of dozens of these in use down under.
Google Joe Cell. I saw these things working in the 70's. Not new just suppressed. I hear of dozens of these in use down under.
That's the one that runs off Orgone energy. Thank goodness, otherwise it would have to be dismissed as wack.
Yes true. However I have seen one work. I suppose we don't know everything. It was only a few years ago that the world was flat.
Re: Free Energy for Real
Of course it worked in the 70's; you know will all the groovy vibes and such.
You mean all this time we have been feeding our nuclear reactors with Uranium when all they really needed was a little "sexual life-force"?
Shoot, in that case I could power a whole city with my abundant sexual life-force.
Peter Clements said:
Of course it worked in the 70's; you know will all the groovy vibes and such.
You mean all this time we have been feeding our nuclear reactors with Uranium when all they really needed was a little "sexual life-force"?
Shoot, in that case I could power a whole city with my abundant sexual life-force.
About 2500. Just yesterday. Fella named Aristotle worked out the spherical nature. Heck, it might even turn out to be true one day, you can never tell.
Interesting trivia: Eratosthenes got the diameter nearly correct about 2200 years ago.
Peter Clements said:
Yep, just a few years...
"Pythagoras (572-492BC) realised that the Earth is a sphere: reasoned because of ships over the horizon, and the positions of stars and poles change in relation to Earth if you move N or S."
Gosh, 2500 years is 'only a few'! I hope you never tell anyone you'll do something 'in a minute...'
Just because 'a few years' ago some people thought the Earth was flat didn't mean everyone thought that way - heck, some people STILL think the Earth is flat!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flat_Earth_Society
We don't know everything, but we do know a LOT about how things (seem) to work. As I have said before, we find out about things in the same way as a child on it's birthday - we try and break our toys! If they break we fix them, if they don't we try and break them a different way. If we can't obviously break them, they become part of our lives, but we NEVER stop trying to break them - that's the way science works.
And as for seeing one work, I've seen a guy make a tiger disappear - I don't know how he did it, so he must be using a 'supernatural' (true sense) power!
(EDIT) Someone a few posts above me said about Pythagoras too, while I was typing...
Hey, don't slag off Orgone. It's great for persuading women to get into a small wooden box with you! 😉
If we could harvest this free methane and amonia:
UK Independent:
Cow 'emissions' more damaging to planet than CO2 from cars
By Geoffrey Lean, Environment Editor
Published: 10 December 2006
Meet the world's top destroyer of the environment. It is not the car, or the plane,or even George Bush: it is the cow.
A United Nations report <snip>
Burning fuel to produce fertiliser to grow feed, to produce meat and to transport it - and clearing vegetation for grazing - produces 9 per cent of all emissions of carbon dioxide, the most common greenhouse gas. And their wind and manure emit more than one third of emissions of another, methane, which warms the world 20 times faster than carbon dioxide.
Livestock also produces more than 100 other polluting gases, including more than two-thirds of the world's emissions of ammonia, one of the main causes of acid rain.
Ranching, the report adds, is "the major driver of deforestation" worldwide, and overgrazing is turning a fifth of all pastures and ranges into desert.Cows also soak up vast amounts of water: it takes a staggering 990 litres of water to produce one litre of milk.
<end snip>
I guess the UN authors believe that cows don't "eliminate" the 989 litres of whatever which don't become milk. Anyone who has been near a cow will relate that they do so with gusto, while delivering enough CH3 and NH3 to choke a maggot.
UK Independent:
Cow 'emissions' more damaging to planet than CO2 from cars
By Geoffrey Lean, Environment Editor
Published: 10 December 2006
Meet the world's top destroyer of the environment. It is not the car, or the plane,or even George Bush: it is the cow.
A United Nations report <snip>
Burning fuel to produce fertiliser to grow feed, to produce meat and to transport it - and clearing vegetation for grazing - produces 9 per cent of all emissions of carbon dioxide, the most common greenhouse gas. And their wind and manure emit more than one third of emissions of another, methane, which warms the world 20 times faster than carbon dioxide.
Livestock also produces more than 100 other polluting gases, including more than two-thirds of the world's emissions of ammonia, one of the main causes of acid rain.
Ranching, the report adds, is "the major driver of deforestation" worldwide, and overgrazing is turning a fifth of all pastures and ranges into desert.Cows also soak up vast amounts of water: it takes a staggering 990 litres of water to produce one litre of milk.
<end snip>
I guess the UN authors believe that cows don't "eliminate" the 989 litres of whatever which don't become milk. Anyone who has been near a cow will relate that they do so with gusto, while delivering enough CH3 and NH3 to choke a maggot.
Oh the poor Flat Eathers. They get pulled out on stage everytime someone wants to talk about kooky stuff.
FWIW, I have read just about all the texts cited in the wikipedia article on the Flat Earth. Had to go to the library of Congress to find some of them. Hope to get to the British Library some day to read more.
"Common Sense" might tell you that the Earth is flat. Just look at it! Go up on a mountain, or far up in an airplane - sure looks flat! And the Flat Earthers have "proven" the Earth to be flat many times. The experiments are very interesting. DO I believe the earth is flat? No, but the reasoning and experiments are very intersting. So are the characters involved.
Back to free energy:
Jacques wanted more info and to see a working model of the Joe Cell.
Joe Cell Down Under has lots of info. Way to confusing and vague, but then I guess it would have to be. If you stand on one foot and talk to it - it will work better!
FWIW, I have read just about all the texts cited in the wikipedia article on the Flat Earth. Had to go to the library of Congress to find some of them. Hope to get to the British Library some day to read more.
"Common Sense" might tell you that the Earth is flat. Just look at it! Go up on a mountain, or far up in an airplane - sure looks flat! And the Flat Earthers have "proven" the Earth to be flat many times. The experiments are very interesting. DO I believe the earth is flat? No, but the reasoning and experiments are very intersting. So are the characters involved.
Back to free energy:
Jacques wanted more info and to see a working model of the Joe Cell.
Joe Cell Down Under has lots of info. Way to confusing and vague, but then I guess it would have to be. If you stand on one foot and talk to it - it will work better!
With all this someone will soon say that wire sounds different or valves work better. The fact is that the Joe Cell really works and is a well proven device. However nobody knows how it works I suppose is worth a good laugh. Just go buy your gas ,pollute the planet , the oil companies really need your money.
Now accupunture might be a good laugh as well, because we don't know how that works. What energy flows? Stand on one leg pehaps??
Now accupunture might be a good laugh as well, because we don't know how that works. What energy flows? Stand on one leg pehaps??
Why the heck would anyone take the "Joe Cell" seriously? I mean look at this utter nonsense......
🙄 🙄 🙄 🙄 🙄 🙄
Sure we do..... it's called the placebo effect.
🙄 🙄 🙄 🙄 🙄 🙄
Sure we do..... it's called the placebo effect.
Perhaps "really" and "well proven" have a different meaning in Australia than the US. It wouldn't be the first time I've been tripped up by language difficulties.
theAnonymous1 said:
If you think acupunture is about placebo, you haven't been poked.
I am well aware of and a big believer in placebo.
Doing open chest surgery using only accupunture as pain relief shows the placebo effect. Seems to work quite well.
I've had acupuncture done to me. Can't say it really helped my ailment. In fact I had more pain in my hand where the needles were placed than before I had the treatment. On the other hand many say it does work and a lot of them are people who previously did not think it would make any difference.
One particular documentary I saw on college sticks in my mind to this day. It was about some form of martial arts and the master put his arm out and challenged the students to throw him. This was an older asian guy mind you, and every time a younger student tried to grab his arm and throw him he was met with a great deal of difficulty. In fact, they couldn't move the old man at all. Then the old man took his hand and motioned as if to push the one student in the chest and it sent him flying backward like something out of the matrix (not quite that exaggerated though). Very strange to watch and even harder to believe but this really didn't look like acting (and after watching many samurai flicks I would say asians are terrible actors). If anyone knows what I'm talking about please remind me what form of martial arts it is.
On the topic of hydrinos... maybe atoms are evolving just like everything else on this planet. Just because we think they're the fundamental building block of all matter doesn't mean that they are. We have since broken them down into smaller pieces so who knows how much more complicated things could be? Personally, I like to think atoms are little solar systems. The electrons are planets and the nucleus is the "sun".
One particular documentary I saw on college sticks in my mind to this day. It was about some form of martial arts and the master put his arm out and challenged the students to throw him. This was an older asian guy mind you, and every time a younger student tried to grab his arm and throw him he was met with a great deal of difficulty. In fact, they couldn't move the old man at all. Then the old man took his hand and motioned as if to push the one student in the chest and it sent him flying backward like something out of the matrix (not quite that exaggerated though). Very strange to watch and even harder to believe but this really didn't look like acting (and after watching many samurai flicks I would say asians are terrible actors). If anyone knows what I'm talking about please remind me what form of martial arts it is.
On the topic of hydrinos... maybe atoms are evolving just like everything else on this planet. Just because we think they're the fundamental building block of all matter doesn't mean that they are. We have since broken them down into smaller pieces so who knows how much more complicated things could be? Personally, I like to think atoms are little solar systems. The electrons are planets and the nucleus is the "sun".
" ... the master put his arm out and challenged the students to throw him. This was an older asian guy mind you, and every time a younger student tried to grab his arm and throw him he was met with a great deal of difficulty. In fact, they couldn't move the old man at all. Then the old man took his hand and motioned as if to push the one student in the chest and it sent him flying backward like something out of the matrix ..."
... the above is absolutely true and accurate about some of these old masters' abilities. I know an "old" guy like that = 67 years young and a very accomplished master. He can and does this for his classes, regularily. He did it to me and it didn't hurt a bit = threw me clear across the class room
... the above is absolutely true and accurate about some of these old masters' abilities. I know an "old" guy like that = 67 years young and a very accomplished master. He can and does this for his classes, regularily. He did it to me and it didn't hurt a bit = threw me clear across the class room
- Status
- Not open for further replies.