using series caps to drop line voltage is an evil short cut to cheapness and other problems.
these are the devices that smoke things when I connect my inverter or UPS to them.
I=C*dV/dt >learn it know it
and yet you see them in a lot of led lamps from china working off the line, celphone chargers and a lot of other stuff....
Yes , I was thinking about all the DIYgene china SMPS's and 300V-KV B+
supplies we tinker with around here.
Would they be considered more dangerous than a series connected 120V Xmas
led string ?
10 years ago , most was nicely isolated by a real trafo - NOT anymore.
OS
supplies we tinker with around here.
Would they be considered more dangerous than a series connected 120V Xmas
led string ?
10 years ago , most was nicely isolated by a real trafo - NOT anymore.
OS
yeah cheap battery chargers are notorious for this. I just started playing around with a 18650 battery charger, (same type of battery used in laptops and the Tesla Motors car) I noticed they don't supply the AC wall thingy anymore. works fine from DC tho.
Last edited:
smps still continue to stir controversy....
while they work off the mains, primary side that is,
they use chopper traffos and opto isolators that
the secondary side is truly isolated off the mains...
while they work off the mains, primary side that is,
they use chopper traffos and opto isolators that
the secondary side is truly isolated off the mains...
yer a funny bird marce, last week you champion using 'offline' SMPS and then today you damn them in another thread. 😉IMO some DIYers are qualified to build "extreme" things and others are clearly not, that's why they have a report button, it lets an 'expert' make the call. But I agree some beginners have no sense building >300W stuff. It takes a few years experience.
I hope the experts will go quiet when a noob says a built this huge-n- dangerous thing and it doesn't work now! but global censorship of images in the PS forum would be bad thing too.
You should have read the views on JC Blowtorch thread on SMPSs.
The reason why I picked up on this one is because there is 380VDC with no transformer isolation, bridges can go short....
You should have read the views on JC Blowtorch thread on SMPSs.
really what was the consensus. do they support my theory or yours. hehe
http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/loun...ch-preamplifier-part-ii-6868.html#post4335128
I'll let you read it before we place any bets...🙂
Don't want to rob you😛
I'll let you read it before we place any bets...🙂
Don't want to rob you😛
John Curl said
that's my view too, although I would replace "audio" with Hi-Fi and "leaky" with too much doo doo
although I don't rule them out they have their places, but Ive designed and used them so I know what to look out for, and ways to fix / filter them. there are many ways to find a power solution, and a SMPS isn't the 1st thing I reach for in Hi-Fi.
I try to avoid switching power supplies for audio, if possible. Too leaky!
that's my view too, although I would replace "audio" with Hi-Fi and "leaky" with too much doo doo
although I don't rule them out they have their places, but Ive designed and used them so I know what to look out for, and ways to fix / filter them. there are many ways to find a power solution, and a SMPS isn't the 1st thing I reach for in Hi-Fi.
Last edited:
You have picked one comment by JC (and a bit obscure at that) out of all the positive comments, and JCs comments are to be taken with a BIG spoon of Audiophile Reality Check.....
You ought to work as a marketing assistant for politicians....🙂
There is some discussion on noise fed back into the mains, there are regulations against this and designs should be done to cater for these regulations, though noise on power lines is a BIG joke these days, we happily add noise to the mains when Power Line Communications are used. The EMC club over here had a campaign to ban them.... Do you know that PWC systems have an EMC exemption, because they work by adding EMC to the power lines.
Power to a system is critical whatever topology you choose, both have good and bad implentations.🙂
You ought to work as a marketing assistant for politicians....🙂
I don't think there are real problems with using smps, but a lot of immaginary ones. Latest AP uses smps afaik because with linear supply they could not get rid of 50/60 Hz totally.
Degradation ? Exactly the contrary.
Lazy cat had tried, and chosen an SMPS for its VSSA and First one amps...because it was sounding better.
(He seems to prefer non regulated ones.)
And those amps are CFAs, reputed for their reduced PSRR.
And this was my opinion since years too.
__________________
There is some discussion on noise fed back into the mains, there are regulations against this and designs should be done to cater for these regulations, though noise on power lines is a BIG joke these days, we happily add noise to the mains when Power Line Communications are used. The EMC club over here had a campaign to ban them.... Do you know that PWC systems have an EMC exemption, because they work by adding EMC to the power lines.
Power to a system is critical whatever topology you choose, both have good and bad implentations.🙂
well I picked his because it is his thread you pointed to?
powerline noise don't get me started... take a look at the PV systems now going in... micro-inverters et al.
powerline noise don't get me started... take a look at the PV systems now going in... micro-inverters et al.
Last edited:
Do the Moderation Team have their answers?I think the Y cap thing is perfectly legit and safe, but the moderation team will discuss it and report back here. Thanks for asking.
Are the Team going to give us guidance that is different from the present Forum Rules?
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
- Home
- Site
- Forum Problems & Feedback
- forum safety rule - question