First Watt SIT5

It does sound like the usual FW case is being used and how that is possible without some serious extra windage will be of interest.

Looking forward to seeing what kind of input stage will be used since we are told the output stage is a buffer.

Of course, it will be good but whether it is any "better" that what has been wrought by Ben Mah, Rahul and ZM remains to be heard.
 
Judging By the review they seem to be truely awesome amps. And they look good, inside out. But the true nerd soul in me gets really horribly tortured by the PICTURE of them very hot running true class A creations STACKED on top of each other.

I know. I know. They were not turned on on and probably not even connected to the mains ln that picture. But i still suffer greatly by just seeing pictures, visions, of such truely horrific SIT-torture.

🙂🙂🙂
 
  • Like
Reactions: Murdoc and mordikai
OMG. Checked it again. The blue leds on the fronts are shining in BOTH channels…

Stacked.

”The horror, The horror!”

IMG_6382.jpeg
 
^ Definitely! But Pa can nail that setting by just listening to the electrons and politely asking them to alter their flow.

Me... I pretty much stick to multi-turn pots. :rofl:

OK.... back to discussing this incredible amp. I wanna hear it...

I always wonder how close our DIY amps get to the "real deal". I'll get a FW amp at some point.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mikerodrig27
Maybe something like this.....

Gainstage the well known circuit from BA-3, no feedback, only heavy load resistors...

Nelson: " Loading the output of a gain element is less popular among amplifier designers, at least among those whose diagrams I peer at in the midnight hours. It is not popular largely because it reduces the gain without any other apparent benefit – just throwing away perfectly good gain that could otherwise be used for feedback. It conjures up the image of throwing away perfectly good food, and your mother would not approve.
We have a saying in my house (lifted from Cesar Milan) that “A tired puppy is a happy puppy.” It is my experience that sometimes you get subjectively better sound from a gain device which is operated at a significant portion of its capacity – not allowed to
loaf around with an easy job. We may find that it sounds better if we make it do some work.
There's nothing magic about this."

:--))

Gain around 18dB

Outputstage like this, he showed in BAF 2022:

"Want more power? Using a P channel Mosfet we will make another version of the mu follower circuit which I call MUFF, for MU Follower Follower. It performs the same task as seen in the previous example, but takes its drive from the Source of the output device instead of the Drain. Works like glue.
R1 and R2 perform the same function as before and the voltage source is provided by an opto-isolator which senses the voltage across R1 + R2 so as to provide constant regulated DC current but variable AC.
The result is fairly spectacular. Now we are getting into the 30-40 watt power range for output power and even higher damping factor."

Of course only speculation......from my side.

:--))

I will do LTspice.
 

Attachments

  • BAF inputstage.png
    BAF inputstage.png
    101.9 KB · Views: 795
  • SIT OS stage.png
    SIT OS stage.png
    24.3 KB · Views: 806
Last edited:
^ Definitely! But Pa can nail that setting by just listening to the electrons and politely asking them to alter their flow.

Me... I pretty much stick to multi-turn pots. :rofl:
I keep a single turn trim pot under my bed pillow in hopes that a the First Watt fairy will come but that hasn't happened yet...

I agree with Generg. Probably a BA3 with alterations, then the SE output involving some sort of optocoupler thing.
 
and may be he did this also.....

"Note that you can invert the power supply polarities on this particular circuit so that the Drain of the SIT is at ground and the Drain of the Mosfet is at V-, and in this way can avoid having power supply noise injected into the output, otherwise you need to have a quiet positive supply."

:--))