100W class A at 8ohm is a bias of 2.5A and about +/-45V rails.
45*2.5*2=225W (this is for 1 channel only ofcourse)
dont you divide by 1.3 for RMS .... ? interesting everyone has a different method or answer vs Rail voltage
Last edited:
dont you divide by 1.3 for RMS .... ? interesting everyone has a different method or answer vs Rail voltage
this is calculation for dissipation. rail voltage*bias*2. or rail voltage*2*bias.
Howdy,
I set my V2 up with no sinks on the diodes,and adjusted the bias around and kept some fingers on the diodes,I set them to around 350 and then cranked the volume and that's when they come on ,I didn't let them stay on too long but a small heatsink should work,I think I will use a heatsink long enought for 2 diodes, maybe keep them closer heat tracking wise.
I read papa's article on them he said they work on the peak times of conducting to keep the impeadance low at high current draw ,if I got that right,LOL.
Thanks for the reply Buzz!
Regards,
NS
I set my V2 up with no sinks on the diodes,and adjusted the bias around and kept some fingers on the diodes,I set them to around 350 and then cranked the volume and that's when they come on ,I didn't let them stay on too long but a small heatsink should work,I think I will use a heatsink long enought for 2 diodes, maybe keep them closer heat tracking wise.
I read papa's article on them he said they work on the peak times of conducting to keep the impeadance low at high current draw ,if I got that right,LOL.
Thanks for the reply Buzz!
Regards,
NS
Thermoswitch from Farnell.
2455R-100-74 - HONEYWELL S&C - THERMAL SWITCH, NC, 70°C, 55°C | Farnell United Kingdom
2455R-100-74 - HONEYWELL S&C - THERMAL SWITCH, NC, 70°C, 55°C | Farnell United Kingdom
Howdy,
I set my V2 up with no sinks on the diodes,and adjusted the bias around and kept some fingers on the diodes,I set them to around 350 and then cranked the volume and that's when they come on ,I didn't let them stay on too long but a small heatsink should work,I think I will use a heatsink long enought for 2 diodes, maybe keep them closer heat tracking wise.
I read papa's article on them he said they work on the peak times of conducting to keep the impeadance low at high current draw ,if I got that right,LOL.
Thanks for the reply Buzz!
Regards,
NS
They dont com eon suddenly, as they are sharong current with the resistors that they are in parallele dwith. As the current increases through that junction the Vdrop increases in proportion to the ratio of their resistance to the Rs. I am not sure they ever complete bypass the Rs, as this would cause instability in the output, moat likely leadin gto thermal runway. I woul dimagine, they work to maintain a similar Vdrop across Rs, regardless of current passing through the junction. Imagine Vdrop staying in the .4-.6V range instead of steadily climbing with increased current. This would affect degeneration amount, bias point, and gain, all in one. Sliding bias😀
Thanks buzz I'll go back and read that article again,They dont com eon suddenly, as they are sharong current with the resistors that they are in parallele dwith. As the current increases through that junction the Vdrop increases in proportion to the ratio of their resistance to the Rs. I am not sure they ever complete bypass the Rs, as this would cause instability in the output, moat likely leadin gto thermal runway. I woul dimagine, they work to maintain a similar Vdrop across Rs, regardless of current passing through the junction. Imagine Vdrop staying in the .4-.6V range instead of steadily climbing with increased current. This would affect degeneration amount, bias point, and gain, all in one. Sliding bias😀
Regards,
NS
They dont com eon suddenly, as they are sharong current with the resistors that they are in parallele dwith. As the current increases through that junction the Vdrop increases in proportion to the ratio of their resistance to the Rs. I am not sure they ever complete bypass the Rs, as this would cause instability in the output, moat likely leadin gto thermal runway. I woul dimagine, they work to maintain a similar Vdrop across Rs, regardless of current passing through the junction. Imagine Vdrop staying in the .4-.6V range instead of steadily climbing with increased current. This would affect degeneration amount, bias point, and gain, all in one. Sliding bias😀
I thought that people were having trouble even having the diodes turning on? ie , the circuit never gets driven hard enough to reach those V and current levels.
In the V3 with 4 pr is it then necessary to put heatsinks on the diodes?
You want some sort of heat dissipation on the diodes no matter what. You have t consider there ability to get rid of heat. With out any thermal coupling. Their internal temp would vary greatly and make for an unstable amp. As a point in fact, in the Paradise bilders thread, there have been people who have been able to affect bias by simply blowing across the boards. Temperature is a major part of any amp build.It is exponentially more important in CLass A. If you want them to cut on, bolt them to the main sink. For most speakers, V3 without diodes may be sufficient, but it nce to have them.
I thought that people were having trouble even having the diodes turning on? ie , the circuit never gets driven hard enough to reach those V and current levels.
In the V3 with 4 pr is it then necessary to put heatsinks on the diodes?
In my case yes, an 8 ohm load ..? i would still sink them , over building is always fun , lets you concentrate on the music...
So maybe it does make sense to mount the diodes on the main sink to warm them up and get them conducting at a lower voltage? It will also eliminate any concern of them overheating (under load).
Hello AudioSan,
Would you put the PS caps together with the Transformer, with the electronics or split them up?
Would you put the PS caps together with the Transformer, with the electronics or split them up?
Hello AudioSan,
Would you put the PS caps together with the Transformer, with the electronics or split them up?
I would put 1/2 & 1/2 the wire between acts like a low value resistor.
Hello AudioSan,
Would you put the PS caps together with the Transformer, with the electronics or split them up?
if you'r thinking of in the same chassis, so yes.
the transformer will be in the front, then the cap bank and front-end board in the back.
I'm thinking of the transformer in a seperate enclosure, from the electronics, and two umbilical cords to the electronics - one enclosure per channel.
What sort of speaker protection are you guys thinking of using? Or none at all?
I am not really crazy about using protection with relays in the speaker circuit. Not with the amount of current that the F5TV3 is able to generate on the output. Any ideas?
I am not really crazy about using protection with relays in the speaker circuit. Not with the amount of current that the F5TV3 is able to generate on the output. Any ideas?
i'm going for NONE🙂
when there is more then one pair of outputs, the risk of total failure decrices.
if one output fails. the outhers keep on going. exept if it shorts. then it most likely is construction fault. i've run my dual output F5 for allmost 1 year now. whitout a hickup. and no protection🙂
i also did run some aleph 2 monoblocks for one year. whitout protection. on one of those i had a output failure. one transistor burned up. i did't notice it before 2-3weeks later🙂 no problem. the amp did keep on playing🙂
when there is more then one pair of outputs, the risk of total failure decrices.
if one output fails. the outhers keep on going. exept if it shorts. then it most likely is construction fault. i've run my dual output F5 for allmost 1 year now. whitout a hickup. and no protection🙂
i also did run some aleph 2 monoblocks for one year. whitout protection. on one of those i had a output failure. one transistor burned up. i did't notice it before 2-3weeks later🙂 no problem. the amp did keep on playing🙂
Last edited:
That is what I am also aiming for. Anyway, that is how I am doing my KSA50 clone that is now almost complete.
BTW, one should never underestimate the amount of work and cost involved in building a decent case for a Class A monster. Besides the cost in metal, it is the time as well as tooling costs if you have not got all the tools yet. I am doing the cases usually by hand as I love metalworking also (No CNC and milling by machines, just a Tablesaw, Drill and a bunch of files).
I bought a M6 Counterbore the other day sothat I can hide the heads of my capscrews, and it cost me a whopping R400 (about $50 US). Maybe I should import my tools also.
BTW, one should never underestimate the amount of work and cost involved in building a decent case for a Class A monster. Besides the cost in metal, it is the time as well as tooling costs if you have not got all the tools yet. I am doing the cases usually by hand as I love metalworking also (No CNC and milling by machines, just a Tablesaw, Drill and a bunch of files).
I bought a M6 Counterbore the other day sothat I can hide the heads of my capscrews, and it cost me a whopping R400 (about $50 US). Maybe I should import my tools also.
This is basically what I have done for my KSA50 clone (decorative front plate still missing and vent holes for top and bottom still needs to be drilled).
I am planning to do the same for each of my F5TV3 monoblocks.
http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=324071&stc=1&d=1358237586
I am planning to do the same for each of my F5TV3 monoblocks.
http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=324071&stc=1&d=1358237586
Attachments
- Home
- Amplifiers
- Pass Labs
- F5 Turbo Builders Thread