He looks better since he shaved a bit.Pordon me choky, but, you look like a monkey?

Guess you gotta mullet over...
Flg,
Finally, what was the voltage on rails and the bias current you settled down with.
How is your dual output f5 amp working now. Planning to build one.
LEt me know.
Thanks
Pandu
Finally, what was the voltage on rails and the bias current you settled down with.
How is your dual output f5 amp working now. Planning to build one.
LEt me know.
Thanks
Pandu
Not finished yet. Everything got put off for moving. That's a huge deal and I'm just now recovering I would say. I have a few other things going on before I can get back to it. Soon!
Maybe something like this (Aleph-style) for better distribution?
Here's an Aleph design using a similar concep.
Attachments
The F5 Turbo article should be done in about a week, always running a little
behind. It will formalize some of what's been going on here and provide more
of a road map to go farther.
😎
behind. It will formalize some of what's been going on here and provide more
of a road map to go farther.
😎
Thanks Papa, any new inovative ideas are welcome to this thread. I really thought there would be more interest but, I'm just another member, and think I they all want comments from the guy with his name on the forum catagory???
😀
😀
Last edited:
Well, now that The "One and Only" has posted the F5 Turbo article, and some diggestion has taken place, we might think we were a little before our time???
Whatever,,, I don't think we are to different than the Version 1???
So, I've manipulated a few things in life and my head... I'm going to go ahead with most of what I have said previously, even after reading the article. I see where many have merged towards option 2 (Diodes in the Rs path). My opinion on that is mostly, How efficient are your speakers??? There is also a good point (based on your speaker eff.) to strive for classA. All the un-expected, out of phase current draw, resonance dips, etc. etc. difficulties can be dealt with in class AB, good enough, IMHO. But 95% or something, will be class A sound and the AB trasients will be tolerable.
The big difference seems to be, Version 1 strives to optimixze a higher voltage higher Z load system and we are trying to optimize a lower Z lower Violtage system 😀
Whatever,,, I don't think we are to different than the Version 1???
So, I've manipulated a few things in life and my head... I'm going to go ahead with most of what I have said previously, even after reading the article. I see where many have merged towards option 2 (Diodes in the Rs path). My opinion on that is mostly, How efficient are your speakers??? There is also a good point (based on your speaker eff.) to strive for classA. All the un-expected, out of phase current draw, resonance dips, etc. etc. difficulties can be dealt with in class AB, good enough, IMHO. But 95% or something, will be class A sound and the AB trasients will be tolerable.
The big difference seems to be, Version 1 strives to optimixze a higher voltage higher Z load system and we are trying to optimize a lower Z lower Violtage system 😀
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
- Home
- Amplifiers
- Pass Labs
- F5 For Low Z Loads ?