Elipticor Midrange

Kms(x) flatness and symmetry is very important. At least as much as BL(x).

now Scan has always had a handle of designing good soft parts; spider/surround and other moving parts/suspension. For almost 2 decades their 18W/8545 was unbeaten in terms of mid-bass; and when it was released in 1985 or thereabouts it had an incredibly soft/pliable surround and never before heard of 6.5mm xmax.

To me, soft/moving/suspension parts has come back to the forefront as being critically important. Even if your motor is Mazda ing as soon as the driver starts moving a few mm everything can go out the window. As illustrated by @lrisbo from Purifi, optimising their surround for neutral Sd and reinforcing cone-edge joint on the back side of the driver.

If someone can do a midrange that can go wide and deep, Scan can do it.

@HiFiCompass are these on your radar?


It’s time to start saving my shitsvillian micro pesos, or go looking and shortlisting midranges from professional/PA manufacturers. Eg. Sica, BMS, Lavoce, 18Sound

something we might be able to buy without crying
I saw this midrange for the first time a couple of days ago and was discouraged by its outer size. I think the reason is the ferrite magnet in the motor. I am sure that this midrange will have the empyreal price, so the question is whether they save on a neodymium magnet only for the sake of profit, and not for the sake of important technical characteristics? I never was impressed by the objective measurements of the Ellipticor tweeters...
 
I dont think it's ferrite. Says neo rigut in the blurb on the website. Looks like the motors on the woofers with individual neo stacks. You can see it through the sidewalls.
Yes, already have seen that. Then it looks like the copper sleeves and very wide magnet gap, as in the case with D2404 tweeter, required incredibly huge motor to get more or less acceptable sensitivity
 
Kms(x) flatness and symmetry is very important. At least as much as BL(x).

now Scan has always had a handle of designing good soft parts; spider/surround and other moving parts/suspension. For almost 2 decades their 18W/8545 was unbeaten in terms of mid-bass; and when it was released in 1985 or thereabouts it had an incredibly soft/pliable surround and never before heard of 6.5mm xmax.

To me, soft/moving/suspension parts has come back to the forefront as being critically important. Even if your motor is Mazda ing as soon as the driver starts moving a few mm everything can go out the window. As illustrated by @lrisbo from Purifi, optimising their surround for neutral Sd and reinforcing cone-edge joint on the back side of the driver.

If someone can do a midrange that can go wide and deep, Scan can do it.

@HiFiCompass are these on your radar?


It’s time to start saving my shitsvillian micro pesos, or go looking and shortlisting midranges from professional/PA manufacturers. Eg. Sica, BMS, Lavoce, 18Sound

something we might be able to buy without crying
Surely Kms(x) isn't particularly relevant in a midrange driver, as, above resonance, the diaphragm's behaviour is mass-controlled?