That Telescope will be a beaut, IMO. Can't wait! I frequently muddle up the Jovian Moons, but I think it goes Io, Europa, Ganymede and the outlier Callisto.
I have mostly been visualising Oscillating Neutrino Physics today.
https://neutrinophysics.fnal.gov/
https://www.particlezoo.net/products/m1-m2-m3-neutrino-set
Funny as anything that site.... there is more:
I also visited the Mathematician's favourite Prime Number forum:
https://www.mersenneforum.org/showthread.php?t=6744&page=6
What a Treasure this 12 minute short video is!
Well posted retina. Tibees aka Toby is a genius. So many Mathematical jokes crammed into this moving tale.
I have mostly been visualising Oscillating Neutrino Physics today.
https://neutrinophysics.fnal.gov/
https://www.particlezoo.net/products/m1-m2-m3-neutrino-set
Funny as anything that site.... there is more:
I also visited the Mathematician's favourite Prime Number forum:
https://www.mersenneforum.org/showthread.php?t=6744&page=6
What a Treasure this 12 minute short video is!
Well posted retina. Tibees aka Toby is a genius. So many Mathematical jokes crammed into this moving tale.
Neutrino oscillation, a quantum mechanical phenomenon: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutrino_oscillation
High energy neutrinos carry information about dramatic events which occur in the Universe in relation to supernovae, gamma-ray bursts, black holes and neutron stars - making them ideal astronomical messengers.
You'll remember my earlier post regarding the IceCube neutrino observatory: https://icecube.wisc.edu/about-us/overview/
Neutrino astronomy is an emerging field in astroparticle physics:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Astroparticle_physics#:~:text=Astroparticle physics, also called particle astrophysics, is a,origin and their relation to astrophysics and cosmology.
Boson, definetly the way to go for paper clip weight, door stop weight, pumping Iron weight and the like
Because no two things (not even an atom) can be in exactly the same place within our perceived universe >
and everything is in motion > and motion effects mass > then the 'arc of motion' means >
NOT EVEN TWO HYDROGEN ATOMS ARE THE SAME. ( everything is in a different space-time-position )
Also, due to motion effecting (relative) time, no two 'anythings' are aging at an identical rate.
This means, on Earth, time & decay is different from the 'poles' to Equator, although smaller than 'miniscule'.
( due to difference of motional speed )
OVER EONS, 'MINISCULE' ADDS UP TO SIGNIFICANCE !
and everything is in motion > and motion effects mass > then the 'arc of motion' means >
NOT EVEN TWO HYDROGEN ATOMS ARE THE SAME. ( everything is in a different space-time-position )
Also, due to motion effecting (relative) time, no two 'anythings' are aging at an identical rate.
This means, on Earth, time & decay is different from the 'poles' to Equator, although smaller than 'miniscule'.
( due to difference of motional speed )
OVER EONS, 'MINISCULE' ADDS UP TO SIGNIFICANCE !
PS.
When in physics we can observe 'the path of least resistance',
we can understand how motion 'has a plan' to settle back to 'a preferred state' = A SINGULARITY (BANG)
( don't let an 'expanding universe' trick you )
When in physics we can observe 'the path of least resistance',
we can understand how motion 'has a plan' to settle back to 'a preferred state' = A SINGULARITY (BANG)
( don't let an 'expanding universe' trick you )
Not only am I QUICK, but I am ACCURATE!
I made it 323.
OK, I took a short cut.
For a bonus point, what is the significance of the School Bus number here?
You did watch it, didn't you?
And please try and end sentences with proper punctuation. 😉
Emoticons are additional.
I made it 323.
OK, I took a short cut.
For a bonus point, what is the significance of the School Bus number here?
You did watch it, didn't you?
And please try and end sentences with proper punctuation. 😉
Emoticons are additional.
I missed the bus.
Someone please call me a taxi! 😉
P.S. I find the number 1728 more useful as I frequently use it as a divisor to convert enclosure volume in cubic inches to cubic feet.
Last edited:
Nobody pays attention to whether the speaker magnet is 20, 40 or 100 oz. anymore. Especially since neo magnets took over.
NASA hasn't succeeded in opening its OSIRIS-REx sample container yet!
So far, much of the 70.3 grams of Bennu material has come from just the area on the outside of the sample collector's head - as can be seen in the above image.
Apparently the team has discovered that two of the 35 fasteners on the sample collectors head "could not be removed with the current tools approved for use in the OSIRIS-REx glovebox".
I'm sure we've all been there when trying to dismantle the occasional amplifier or loudspeaker! 😀
Read the full story here: https://www.space.com/osiris-rex-asteroid-sample-passes-goal
So far, much of the 70.3 grams of Bennu material has come from just the area on the outside of the sample collector's head - as can be seen in the above image.
Apparently the team has discovered that two of the 35 fasteners on the sample collectors head "could not be removed with the current tools approved for use in the OSIRIS-REx glovebox".
I'm sure we've all been there when trying to dismantle the occasional amplifier or loudspeaker! 😀
Read the full story here: https://www.space.com/osiris-rex-asteroid-sample-passes-goal
More on neutrino astronomy:
Scientists in China are building the world's largest neutrino detector on the sea bed 3.5 kilometres below the surface of the Western Pacific Ocean.
It will be known as the Tropical Deep-sea Neutrino Telescope (Trident), and is due for completion in 2030.
Neutrino detectors have to sit under a lot of water or ice in order to detect the rare flashes of light caused by neutrinos interacting with water molecules
Read about the constructional technicalities here: https://www.space.com/china-worlds-largest-underwater-telescope-hunt-for-elusive-ghost-particles
Scientists in China are building the world's largest neutrino detector on the sea bed 3.5 kilometres below the surface of the Western Pacific Ocean.
It will be known as the Tropical Deep-sea Neutrino Telescope (Trident), and is due for completion in 2030.
Neutrino detectors have to sit under a lot of water or ice in order to detect the rare flashes of light caused by neutrinos interacting with water molecules
Read about the constructional technicalities here: https://www.space.com/china-worlds-largest-underwater-telescope-hunt-for-elusive-ghost-particles
The scientific!!! proof of neutrinos will never succeed, because neutrino is the reification of a conception of non-scientists, who cannot distinguish object and concept.
Neutrinos are part of mainstream-, popular-, propaganda-"science".
Neutrinos are part of mainstream-, popular-, propaganda-"science".
Well, cumbb, you won't be flavour of the month with the particle physicists! 😀
What's your view on dark photons? Messengers from the dark side?
https://physicsworld.com/a/dark-photons-could-explain-high-energy-scattering-data/
What's your view on dark photons? Messengers from the dark side?
https://physicsworld.com/a/dark-photons-could-explain-high-energy-scattering-data/