Just go to the section entitled "Modern Discourse" and you'll see that the observational evidence for this "hypothesis" is inconclusive, with doubt being cast on the way the data has been handled.
However, these observations were made in the period 2001 to 2007 and I should still like to see more "modern measurements".
We will have to wait until someone trawls through the latest data sets for something more conclusive.
Inconclusive data is always another opportunity to do more research in my view.
Inconclusive data is always another opportunity to do more research in my view.
All appears to have gone quiet on the redshift quantisation front until the Phys.org article of 23 Sep 2024 to which you linked.
My search for "new evidence on redshift quantization" draws a blank. All I can find are several repeats of the observations reported in the Wikipedia article.
My search for "new evidence on redshift quantization" draws a blank. All I can find are several repeats of the observations reported in the Wikipedia article.
Hera is a direct quote from the article: "
The suggestion is that space-time emerges from a deeper theory. From a philosophical perspective, what does it mean to say that space-time is emergent?
It means there’s something more fundamental, and that space-time only exists at our level as a kind of approximation."On this it follows naturally that ST as we know it will be replaced by a new night that goes deeper and also of course explains ST and possibly gravity.
//
The 'Treatise on Conic Sections' by Apollonius of Perga is one of the most important mathematical works to have come down to us from the Ancient World.
Apollonius espoused the geocentric model of the Solar System, but two thousand years later, Isaac Newton would show that Apollonius’s conic sections made excellent mathematical models for the planetary orbits of the heliocentric system.
https://www.britannica.com/biography/Apollonius-of-Perga
It's the same conic section stuff in Special Relativity, but getting a bit deeper with the inclusion of Hyperbolic shapes becoming the conjugate of circles via "complex" angles....
This is how the light cones work with observers moving:
The new A3 comet is apparently close to unbound to the Sun (extreme ellipse, maybe 80,000 years period) and may be ejected altogether (hyperbolic) from the Solar System on its way out.
This all looks doable, though the full moon on the 17th October is slightly awkward. Low in the South-West 2 hours after sunset I think.
I was out photographing Corona Borealis tonight as usual looking for the Nova. 4 seconds, f1.8, ISO 800 on a tripod. Time release shutter.
Even my cronies were excited about the comet, though I never think much of them, Usually disappointing spectacles. Lucky if you see anything with light pollution. 🙄
This is how the light cones work with observers moving:
The new A3 comet is apparently close to unbound to the Sun (extreme ellipse, maybe 80,000 years period) and may be ejected altogether (hyperbolic) from the Solar System on its way out.
This all looks doable, though the full moon on the 17th October is slightly awkward. Low in the South-West 2 hours after sunset I think.
I was out photographing Corona Borealis tonight as usual looking for the Nova. 4 seconds, f1.8, ISO 800 on a tripod. Time release shutter.
Even my cronies were excited about the comet, though I never think much of them, Usually disappointing spectacles. Lucky if you see anything with light pollution. 🙄
And last visible from Earth when Neanderthals were walking the planet!
It could be visible to the naked eye in the Northern hemisphere in October.
It has already been seen in the Southern hemisphere, here over Lake Pukaki, New Zealand:
There are two main periods during which UK observers have an opportunity to see it.
Here's the when and how: https://metro.co.uk/2024/09/29/see-a-once-80-000-years-comet-uk-october-2024-21699657/
I have a map of the sky in my head. 🤣
I expect yours truly will be posting pictures of this (alleged) "Comet of the Century"!
My cronies told me it will be visible in daylight and such typical internet nonsense... really! 💩
Current UK weather is frightful, so happily no need for dawn expeditions. Good news is the comet is highly inclined above the ecliptic on its way in and out so shouldn't be too difficult in the evening next month.
Perhaps TNT can hone his camera skills in the better skies of Sweden. I already have his high-res snap of the Northern skies and Capella and (surprisingly) the Andromeda Galaxy as my wall paper:
https://www.diyaudio.com/community/...enerates-gravity.393908/page-233#post-7756750
I am working through more of those excellent CalTech 1985 lectures on Special Relativity. Not quite the same thing as discussions of Gravity, of course.
Veritasium is on my approved list of internet physics pundits. I am amazed that I am sitting here in a non-inertial frame, being accelerated upwards at 9.8 metres per second per second as I type.
There is no such thing as the force of gravity! Not many people know that. 😎
I expect yours truly will be posting pictures of this (alleged) "Comet of the Century"!
My cronies told me it will be visible in daylight and such typical internet nonsense... really! 💩
Current UK weather is frightful, so happily no need for dawn expeditions. Good news is the comet is highly inclined above the ecliptic on its way in and out so shouldn't be too difficult in the evening next month.
Perhaps TNT can hone his camera skills in the better skies of Sweden. I already have his high-res snap of the Northern skies and Capella and (surprisingly) the Andromeda Galaxy as my wall paper:
https://www.diyaudio.com/community/...enerates-gravity.393908/page-233#post-7756750
I am working through more of those excellent CalTech 1985 lectures on Special Relativity. Not quite the same thing as discussions of Gravity, of course.
Veritasium is on my approved list of internet physics pundits. I am amazed that I am sitting here in a non-inertial frame, being accelerated upwards at 9.8 metres per second per second as I type.
There is no such thing as the force of gravity! Not many people know that. 😎
We haven't missed anything in Europe with the Comet. The angles made it almost impossible to see anything in the morning here.
It's closest to the Sun on 9th. October, and near Mercury's orbit. Looks alright from about the 17th with the full moon rising in the East.
Whole thing will be a trade-off of low altitude and the full moon and the comet getting fainter as it moves higher in the twilight.
I am thinking 20th. October 20.00 Hrs might be optimum. 2 hours after sunset if we are back to GMT. About 15 degrees high near the West. Use Vega and Arcturus as locators.
This website is easy enough to adjust for time and date and location, which defaults to Greenwich:
https://theskylive.com/c2023a3-info
I struggled on Saturday with twilight and clouds and city light for my usual Corona Borealis Nova shot.
But I know where to look now. @TNT may be interested to know that I think the MFn button on his camera toggles to aperture setting from exposure time on his Canon DSLR with the control wheel.
He says he struggled to get the full f3.5 on his 11-20mm small frame.
Of course, we might get lucky and get the Nova AND the Comet in one shot! 😎
It's closest to the Sun on 9th. October, and near Mercury's orbit. Looks alright from about the 17th with the full moon rising in the East.
Whole thing will be a trade-off of low altitude and the full moon and the comet getting fainter as it moves higher in the twilight.
I am thinking 20th. October 20.00 Hrs might be optimum. 2 hours after sunset if we are back to GMT. About 15 degrees high near the West. Use Vega and Arcturus as locators.
This website is easy enough to adjust for time and date and location, which defaults to Greenwich:
https://theskylive.com/c2023a3-info
I struggled on Saturday with twilight and clouds and city light for my usual Corona Borealis Nova shot.
But I know where to look now. @TNT may be interested to know that I think the MFn button on his camera toggles to aperture setting from exposure time on his Canon DSLR with the control wheel.
He says he struggled to get the full f3.5 on his 11-20mm small frame.
Of course, we might get lucky and get the Nova AND the Comet in one shot! 😎
It was a very clear nigh yesterday but I was too tired to do any shooting. Lets see this night 🙂
Thanks for the Man tip!! 🙂
//
Thanks for the Man tip!! 🙂
//
I tried to use the MFn but no effect. The main dail should be possible but no. Now I read that one can di it in the Q menu.... lets see...
//
//
The famous "Starry Night" painting by Vincent van Gogh surprisingly obeys the laws of physics!
Scientists have determined those eddies adhere to the physics of turbulent flow, in particular Kolmogorov's theory.
Read about the study of Vincent's brushstrokes here: https://www.space.com/van-gogh-starry-night-physics-accuracy
Scientists have determined those eddies adhere to the physics of turbulent flow, in particular Kolmogorov's theory.
Read about the study of Vincent's brushstrokes here: https://www.space.com/van-gogh-starry-night-physics-accuracy
Latest T Cor Bor news! https://www.space.com/astronomers-new-star-nova-explosion-t-coronae-borealis
Published just two days ago: "Any day now, our night sky will host a guest star".
Keep your eyes peeled guys, the event will be visible to the unaided eye only for the first few days.
However, it will be visible to gamma and x-ray telescopes for a few months, and to radio telescopes for years to come.
Published just two days ago: "Any day now, our night sky will host a guest star".
Keep your eyes peeled guys, the event will be visible to the unaided eye only for the first few days.
However, it will be visible to gamma and x-ray telescopes for a few months, and to radio telescopes for years to come.