Dave's 8" woofer + 104mm tweeter speaker build

This weekends update,

Put some Osmo Oil finish on the Seawaves, installed the binding posts and the drivers, made measurements in 10º increments 0º to 180º horizontally and -180º to +180º vertically, designed a crossover and did some validation measurements to ensure the design and reality matched.

Today's post will have lots of boring graphs, if anyone wants more detail about a specific slide, please ask.
 

Attachments

  • 103 - starting finish.jpg
    103 - starting finish.jpg
    223.1 KB · Views: 194
  • 104 - finish done.jpg
    104 - finish done.jpg
    253.2 KB · Views: 171
  • 104a - binding posts installed.jpg
    104a - binding posts installed.jpg
    308 KB · Views: 220
  • 105 - starting measuring.jpg
    105 - starting measuring.jpg
    134.3 KB · Views: 229
  • 107 - raw woofer.jpg
    107 - raw woofer.jpg
    140.7 KB · Views: 211
  • 106 - raw tweeter.jpg
    106 - raw tweeter.jpg
    121.3 KB · Views: 201
  • 108 - raw woofer and tweeter.jpg
    108 - raw woofer and tweeter.jpg
    137.5 KB · Views: 181
  • 109 - tweeter with filter.jpg
    109 - tweeter with filter.jpg
    112.5 KB · Views: 186
  • 110 - woofer with filter.jpg
    110 - woofer with filter.jpg
    117.8 KB · Views: 220
  • 113 - crossover schematic.jpg
    113 - crossover schematic.jpg
    30.9 KB · Views: 255
  • 112 - measured woofer and tweeter with filter 0º - 60º.jpg
    112 - measured woofer and tweeter with filter 0º - 60º.jpg
    158.8 KB · Views: 249
  • 111 - tweeter and woofer with filter.jpg
    111 - tweeter and woofer with filter.jpg
    125.4 KB · Views: 185
  • 114 - xo spl chart.jpg
    114 - xo spl chart.jpg
    103.9 KB · Views: 200
  • 115 - xo spl chart with reverse null.jpg
    115 - xo spl chart with reverse null.jpg
    106.2 KB · Views: 200
  • 116 - Power and DI.jpg
    116 - Power and DI.jpg
    119.5 KB · Views: 163
  • 117 - impedance.jpg
    117 - impedance.jpg
    99.4 KB · Views: 150
  • 118 - filter slopes.jpg
    118 - filter slopes.jpg
    107 KB · Views: 150
  • 119 - phase.jpg
    119 - phase.jpg
    87.3 KB · Views: 142
  • 121 - distortion 97db @315 mm or 88db @1m pct.jpg
    121 - distortion 97db @315 mm or 88db @1m pct.jpg
    155.4 KB · Views: 147
  • 122 - distortion 97db @315 mm or 88db @1m spl.jpg
    122 - distortion 97db @315 mm or 88db @1m spl.jpg
    227.5 KB · Views: 165
Small update for today, playing around with PR weight options.

Low end measurements with 0, 20 and 40 grams added to the Dayton DSA270-PR 10" passive radiator.

As my previous graphs show, I was having a little problem merging the passive radiator with the woofer and ended up with a peak at the low end.

Scott Hinson reminded me about the REW option to use "In the Box" microphone measurements and that is how these measurements were done, no merge required to see where the roll off is.

In the end I oped for no added weight and went with the green response.
 

Attachments

  • 125- drill hole bottom of cabinet.jpg
    125- drill hole bottom of cabinet.jpg
    234.4 KB · Views: 151
  • 127 - mic inna box 2.jpg
    127 - mic inna box 2.jpg
    204.7 KB · Views: 147
  • 126 - mic inna box.jpg
    126 - mic inna box.jpg
    155.8 KB · Views: 168
  • 128 - PR weight options.jpg
    128 - PR weight options.jpg
    138.3 KB · Views: 152
  • 129 - REW Mic inna box button.jpg
    129 - REW Mic inna box button.jpg
    69.9 KB · Views: 137
  • Like
Reactions: GM
With the PR weights all decided on, it was time to build the XO's, install them, wire up the drivers, button everything up and hope they met my expectations!

I am very pleased with how they turned out and sound!
 

Attachments

  • 130 - starting woofer XO.jpg
    130 - starting woofer XO.jpg
    278.9 KB · Views: 166
  • 131 - woofer XO 2.jpg
    131 - woofer XO 2.jpg
    259.5 KB · Views: 110
  • 133 - woofer xo 4.jpg
    133 - woofer xo 4.jpg
    235.9 KB · Views: 99
  • 132 - woofer xo 3.jpg
    132 - woofer xo 3.jpg
    239.2 KB · Views: 102
  • 134 - tweeter xo 1.jpg
    134 - tweeter xo 1.jpg
    245 KB · Views: 96
  • 135 - tweeter xo 2.jpg
    135 - tweeter xo 2.jpg
    233.6 KB · Views: 104
  • 136 - all xos ready to install.jpg
    136 - all xos ready to install.jpg
    215.2 KB · Views: 104
  • 137 - screwing in xo.jpg
    137 - screwing in xo.jpg
    190.1 KB · Views: 108
  • 138 - both xos installed.jpg
    138 - both xos installed.jpg
    201.9 KB · Views: 106
  • 139 - installing drivers.jpg
    139 - installing drivers.jpg
    283.6 KB · Views: 108
  • 140 - securing wires.jpg
    140 - securing wires.jpg
    203.2 KB · Views: 171
  • 141 - finally listening to the finished pair.jpg
    141 - finally listening to the finished pair.jpg
    214.2 KB · Views: 172
What was the problem or challenge? Measurement or Merging tool in VituixCAD2 or passive radiator simulation?
I’ve found that the BR and sealed simulations are close to perfect in VituixCAD2 but the PR needs empirical testing; significant mismatch between the model and the result.
 
  • Thank You
Reactions: GM
What was the problem or challenge? Measurement or Merging tool in VituixCAD2 or passive radiator simulation?
I’ve found that the BR and sealed simulations are close to perfect in VituixCAD2 but the PR needs empirical testing; significant mismatch between the model and the result.
I suppose the inconsistency is likely PR spec vs reality, where a port is just a tube.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tktran303
Interesting comment about the brightness.

@Wolf are you saying that you didn’t feel ot was bright at all; or just a tiny bit on the bright side, but that others were far brighter?

Any ideas where this is coming from? Listener preference, room or recordings?

CTA2034A looks very good.
I wonder whether it’s the the LW slope- speaks to be completely flat or even ever so slight rising
What’s the target PIR or PR slope?

A simple resister on the tweeter (or a DSP shelf filter) to allow for a 1dB drop in the LW will probably suit many listeners/rooms.