• The Vendor's Bazaar forum is for commercial offers and transactions. Only unmoderated members can post here.

    diyAudio provides this forum for the convenience of our members, but makes no warranty nor assumes any responsibility. We do not vet any members. Use of this facility is at your own risk. Customers can post any issues in those threads as long as it is done in a civil manner. All diyAudio rules about conduct apply and will be enforced.

Cosmos APU a notch+LNA $70 to outperform APx555b for $30,000

Could have been a nice standard feature in Audacity or REW. Simple but effective to keep noise down but allow for overload. (When overload is like in the example, just a fraction of the time of the recording)
For stepped measurements it is the noise that is interesting at low levels and distortion at high levels. This could solve some of this problem for one take measurements.
For DUTs with limited current drive capability, but low noise, especially.
(The cutover level don't have to be at 0dBFS for high gain channel, could be at -6 or - 20dB)
 
Last edited:
Finally, I see artifacts after setting 24bits WAV and +70db amplification. Indeed, DC blocking is a good idea, with the HPF switching error being about -90-96db for the high-gain ADC i.e. practically inaudible. With DC offset, it is about -80db, also not a biggie at all.
2025-06-04_20-16-07.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: torgeirs
Just curious - what problem does this solve?

I get why commercial audio interface and recorder manufacturers like this. It provides a feature that is appealing to users who don't want to set levels so accurately. But, for measurements?

I'm not proud, so I'm fine with being told what I'm probably missing.
 
Just curious - what problem does this solve?

I get why commercial audio interface and recorder manufacturers like this. It provides a feature that is appealing to users who don't want to set levels so accurately. But, for measurements?

I'm not proud, so I'm fine with being told what I'm probably missing.
If you ever wanted to record explosive sounds (gun shot, lightning thunder, etc) and you have only one try, you know why doing away with any headroom issues is a good thing.
And for measurements, stacked ADC's and DACs's can completely put away with annoying level (auto-)ranging issues.
It will not take too long until this will be standard practice and nobody will question its benefits.
It is like with electrical vehicles, nobody really misses manual (or automatic) gear shifting to the optimal torque range like we had to do with combustion engines.
 
1749079058097.png1749079108420.png1749079160606.png
This real world nonperfect 4 series "cheap" opamp measurements illustrates some of the measurement dilemma
640R gives low noise but can be overloaded and loads the cirquit so odd harmonics rise.
3k48 has higher measurement noise, but the loading is less. So more real harmonics for normal loading.
At low level I want to se the noise. At high level i dont want signal overload and I dont want excessive loading of circuit.
I have added 100Hz in one of the FFT plots for clarity.
4000Hz test tone at max about -3dBFS (640) and -13dBFS (3k48)
(Single ended with poorly regulated switchmode supply)
 
Last edited:
Last edited: