No. Life is programmed to procreate. Once that is done, your life has very little value for the species.
Jan
Not correct either. For example most of the ants and bees, aka workers do not reproduce.
Those worker bees are certainly not concerned about their own life! The important goal is to keep the queen fed and healthy and laying eggs.
Jan
People do the most dangerous things to get a partner and make kids, no matter how dangerous.
One of the best motivators for soldiers is to tell them they have to sacrifice their life to protect their wifes and kids. QED.
One of the problems with having female soldiers in frontline fighting roles is that if one of those would get into trouble, male soldiers would rush to their rescue, forgetting caution, training and orders.
It's part of our genetic makeup.
Jan
Of course. The risk of death doesn't stop people to procreate, that's the most important goal.
Even being diagnosed with veneral disease and risk of horrible death doesn't stop people Doing the Deed!
If you understand evolution it's all so logical.
Hence the large families. You had to make babies, babies, babies because most of them died anyway before the 1st year.
Better medical care meant that they now all survive, so we've got way too many people, but our genetic predisposition is too slow to adapt fast enough.
Although you see in developed countries that the number of babies per family does indeed drop as a function of prosperity.
Jan
Even being diagnosed with veneral disease and risk of horrible death doesn't stop people Doing the Deed!
If you understand evolution it's all so logical.
Hence the large families. You had to make babies, babies, babies because most of them died anyway before the 1st year.
Better medical care meant that they now all survive, so we've got way too many people, but our genetic predisposition is too slow to adapt fast enough.
Although you see in developed countries that the number of babies per family does indeed drop as a function of prosperity.
Jan
ha ha that can very well be true. 🙂
How about an atheist doing random act of good ?
Regards.
It's easy not complex.
No, its so complex its not easy.
Or ist in a higher order like a to or more armed pendulum.
a single armed pendulum has one constand and is used for watches and ther that neads a precie predictin.
In real life we ar al into multiarmed pendulums. I need different amount of time to sleep, i eat different, every day, temperature enviroment density humidity pressure gravity. Al are wariants thats unpredctable.
A solid sttateamp has bias feedback in some way. But this temp is dependent on load plate mounnted air flow air density air temperature. Sigal load load load reflectio and several other parameters.
Thus its more than a single arm its a multi linked arm.
Its already proved that a double pendulum goes into kaos theory.
A amplifiers bias goes into caos caused by several time delayed functions or parameters.
Just like a picup arm and the pickup nedle. The speaker temperature the seaker movement, the air density air huidity and so on.
Good luck in all your predictions.
No, its so complex its not easy.
Or ist in a higher order like a to or more armed pendulum.
a single armed pendulum has one constand and is used for watches and ther that neads a precie predictin.
In real life we ar al into multiarmed pendulums. I need different amount of time to sleep, i eat different, every day, temperature enviroment density humidity pressure gravity. Al are wariants thats unpredctable.
A solid sttateamp has bias feedback in some way. But this temp is dependent on load plate mounnted air flow air density air temperature. Sigal load load load reflectio and several other parameters.
Thus its more than a single arm its a multi linked arm.
Its already proved that a double pendulum goes into kaos theory.
A amplifiers bias goes into caos caused by several time delayed functions or parameters.
Just like a picup arm and the pickup nedle. The speaker temperature the seaker movement, the air density air huidity and so on.
Good luck in all your predictions.
don't agree either.
the workers are there to allow the queen and the larvae to live, so they are in the process of reproduction "by default"
Every living thing on this earth is programmed to reproduce, one way or another.
Of course, survival of a given species has to take the whole population into account; some individuals do not reproduce or even are sacrificed for the greater good. One notch higher, complete ecosystems are involved in the survival of multiple species.
My previous comment stressed the point, which still stands, that reproduction of all single individuals is not required nor hard coded as suggested by another poster.
My previous comment stressed the point, which still stands, that reproduction of all single individuals is not required nor hard coded as suggested by another poster.
Interestingly, the same base resistors that improve output stage stability and lighter VAS loading are the same ones that contribute to hard clipping for BJTs
Survival of spices is secondary goal. Main goal is the survival of oneself. Many species do canabalism and kill their own kind. Human are also in it. And reproduction is present in nearly all species due to natural selection. Because Every species that donot reproduce are long gone. So its is not what define, what is living.
They've finally admitted that a BS generator is built-in.
Convincing is more important than being correct.
Typical software people's smoke and mirrors.
"Google's search engine boss said AI chatbots can give "convincing" but "fictitious" answers."
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/tech...us-answers-report-says/ar-AA17olqo?ocid=twmsn
Convincing is more important than being correct.
Typical software people's smoke and mirrors.
"Google's search engine boss said AI chatbots can give "convincing" but "fictitious" answers."
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/tech...us-answers-report-says/ar-AA17olqo?ocid=twmsn
And ChatGPT recommends that you fact check anything it tells you. It does not give citations or links that it uses to compose it's answers so you can't review sources like on Wikipedia.
AI is software trained on buckets of data. The training produces a black box that even the programmers do not truly understand. But it is an entertaining tool.