Capacitor swap, missing warmth....

Swapping capacitors can affect the frequency response slightly (~ 1 dB) if the originals are electrolytics in good shape. If the originals are aged electrolytics, the difference can be large (several dB).

For information, the original capacitors were said to be mylar or polypropylene types. Information about these speakers here:

SoundStage! Equipment Review - Clements 206di Loudspeaker (11/1997)

SoundStage said:
The crossovers are hand built and hard wired using mylar and polypropylene capacitors in a bypass configuration.
It is not completely clear to me what 'bypass' refers to. Does it refer to 'bypass crossover configuration' (what does that mean?) or to 'generic capacitors bypassed by mylar or polypropylene capacitors'?
 
Last edited:
Bypass on my original board using a second capacitor to influence the first. Let's say I wanted 3 uF and the cost of a better capacitor (sound wise) was much more than a .8uf so I soldered a less expensive 2.2uf in parallel with a nicer .8uf = 3uf.

 

Attachments

  • image510.jpeg
    image510.jpeg
    80.8 KB · Views: 290
Last edited by a moderator:
At this point much has happened. All I can say is try a little resistance in your crossover.

Thanks for the advice. I used this technique toning down a Grado Reference Sonata cartridge retipped with a contact line stylus and ruby cantilever. Ran A resistor parallel on my my RCA Y input (made a plug in) to the phono pre amp. I’ll do a little math to figure out where to start.
 
OK now the sound prior to the rebuild was very warm with great mid, lower frequency spatial qualities.
I am motivated by the fact you liked the sound before and want to get it back. I would start adding the resistance in series with the cap. I would start with less than an ohm.

This is for your tweeter. If the woofer has changed much that's another story.
 
Please swap back the squarred capacitor, you certainly moved from MKT caps (yellow is MKP or MKC or MKT?) towards Polypro which may explain less ESR with the Claritys and the perceived change + bias (you are so focused on a change that you may hear it wheither it happens)


What do you hear when going back with the formers ?
 
I am motivated by the fact you liked the sound before and want to get it back. I would start adding the resistance in series with the cap. I would start with less than an ohm.

This is for your tweeter. If the woofer has changed much that's another story.

AllenB, looking on line I see single resistor like you recommended and 2 resistors. I have the second resistor to match your 1 ohm recommendation. I don’t know what difference I would hear going to 2 resistors.

6F8F2ED8-99C8-4F5A-BFE7-7BBAA57E3D63.jpeg
 
Your situation is a special one and it is not about attenuating the tweeter (even though it looks that way).

Normally I would encourage you to consider two resistors for the reduced source impedance at the speaker node, however, your position is specifically compensating for a replaced capacitor.

When a capacitor is changed and it has a different ESR and you want to compensate directly, then you should use one resistor.
 
Your situation is a special one and it is not about attenuating the tweeter (even though it looks that way).

Normally I would encourage you to consider two resistors for the reduced source impedance at the speaker node, however, your position is specifically compensating for a replaced capacitor.

When a capacitor is changed and it has a different ESR and you want to compensate directly, then you should use one resistor.

Thanks for the explanation. I’m adding the resistor now. I made an add on to the end of the tweeter connection from the crossover board with a 1ohm resistor soldered under the shrink tube. I think this is the direction you advised.
E742F329-1464-4ED4-BEB4-844D2D5C0399.jpg
 
Last edited: