Most people saying such things don't actually want to move technology forward; they actually want to move it back and unlearn much of the knowledge gained in the past century. They then think they can restart from there and move forward again. Science doesn't work like that, except where it is shown conclusively that what we thought we knew is actually false.eriksquires said:
In the case of speaker cables we do not know that accepted knowledge is false. On the contrary, there is excellent evidence that it is true. Listening tests confirm what electrical theory tells us: swapping one good (i.e. competent) speaker cable for another makes at most tiny changes to the sound which are entirely consistent with the small change in cable resistance causing a tiny change in frequency response.
Audio technology will move forward by solving problems, not coming up with half-baked 'solutions' to non-problems.
I've already shown the fatal flaws in that alleged experiment with authoritative cites.
The continuing faith that egregiously flawed little game that seems to be show some serious problems with accepting authority and other's people's work.
Here's the logic: If someone will not accept authority or the validity of other people's work, then doing their work for them as it were, is a big mistake.
Just another example of the results of not accepting authority or other people's work. There are several well-known ways to do DBTs all by yourself, and hundreds if not thousands of people practice them successfully.
There is a ton of reliable evidence to back it up, but again you are being crushed by the burden of an apparent insistence on not accepting authority or other people's work.
Most cables are not expensive tone controls, they are placebos, pure and simple.
Just another example of habitual lack of faith in established, validated authority. The grievous and inherent failings of your alleged experiment have been explained to you, but it appears that you are in denial.
- Status
- Not open for further replies.