Cable lifts! the final step to audiophile nirvana?

Status
Not open for further replies.
You decide what you think only after you listen, is how it works here. Otherwise, your imagination will lead you badly astray as yours obviously has.

So, you are suggesting that after nearly 40 years as an audio hobbyist and more than 30 years as a service technician my imagination has run away with me?

Hooookaaaaayyyy...

Why use the cables in the first place if they are not perfect in every way?

I dunno... I always thought it was about getting the signal from one device to another...
 
Last edited:
Listening to the salesman pitch, who knows how to make believe in the wonders of golden ears is the trick.

The problem with that approach is that people are going to hear what you tell them to hear...
"Now listen to how the soundstage opens up and the air is far more transparent"...
To NOT hear that is now a failure and most people simply hate to fail.

Listening to the differences is only of any value if they're listened to at home using the listener's usual system over an extended period of time.

Exactly ... it takes time for confirmation bias to wear off... and it always does, sending the guy back out to find a new improvement.

Sounds like a null test is in order.
YouTube

ROFL ... Gotta love Ethan Winer.
 
Last edited:
So, you are suggesting that after nearly 40 years as an audio hobbyist and more than 30 years as a service technician my imagination has run away with me?

Yes. It doesn't matter what experience you have if you haven't learned you can still be wrong sometimes.

... I always thought it was about getting the signal from one device to another...

My point precisely, get the signal from one device to another with minimal degradation. That's why I use the cables I do.
 
Last edited:
Listening to the differences is only of any value if they're listened to at home using the listener's usual system over an extended period of time.

Not true. Listening to be sure of the tiniest differences accurately can take a few days. Definitely more than one listening session. Lots of practice helps. For an unskilled listener using poor quality reproduction equipment it might take weeks, months, possibly never hear a difference.

Some differences are obvious enough that they are very quickly recognizable.
 
Not true. Listening to be sure of the tiniest differences accurately can take a few days. Definitely more than one listening session. Lots of practice helps. For an unskilled listener using poor quality reproduction equipment it might take weeks, months, possibly never hear a difference.

Some differences are obvious enough that they are very quickly recognizable.
I meant of value to the person who will be doing the listening. 🙄
 
Yes. It doesn't matter what experience you have if you haven't learned you can still be wrong sometimes.

Right back atcha Mark...

And, the sad truth is that you are wrong about this. I've done at least a dozen repair calls on high end systems with real strange problems and allmost every case it's these freaking exotic wires causing the trouble. In one case, it was RCA cables so heavy they were breaking the female sides off the back of the equipment.

No sir, I've done the lab time and you're not going to tell me you can tune up a system with wire...
especially when you've already told me that your magic XLR cable doesn't work as well as a standard one likely would.
 
Last edited:
Right back atcha Mark...

And, the sad truth is...

Douglas,
You don't know what you are talking about in this case. I am already very well aware of all the audiophiles using expensive cables that are hurting their sound. Also, quite aware that going back to the original cables will substantially restore sound quality. Why are you so confident you are the only person who could possibly know such a thing and have such experience?

In fact I know more than you do, and have longer and more impressive experience than you do. Will it convince you that you might be wrong if I rattle it off? If not, then why do think I should be impressed by your experience?
 
Whatever you can provide, anything would be nice, I can't afford the airfare.

That's fair, taken at face value. However, I have already said in another thread that after we have a few diyaudio visitors come through here I could be agreeable to audio recordings. I think they would be more useful than FFTs when talking about perceptual objectionableness of particular audible artifacts (and FFTs are not useful anyway for showing small yet objectionable linear distortion). As I tried to explain before, I have serious doubts people would believe there could be such clearly audible differences without what might be called pathological causation. Perhaps things will work out that someday billshurv will visit. I would like to have visitors sooner rather than later, but people on the forum don't seem to have much interest even if they do live within driving distance.
 
Last edited:
Right back atcha Mark...

And, the sad truth is that you are wrong about this. I've done at least a dozen repair calls on high end systems with real strange problems and allmost every case it's these freaking exotic wires causing the trouble. In one case, it was RCA cables so heavy they were breaking the female sides off the back of the equipment.

No sir, I've done the lab time and you're not going to tell me you can tune up a system with wire...
especially when you've already told me that your magic XLR cable doesn't work as well as a standard one likely would.
Douglas, belated welcome to DIY Audio Forum. Since you are relatively new here, let me give you a bit of history on Markw4. He has an affiliation with audio business run by a forum member named jam so Markw4 shills for jam's company which sells DACs and cables just to name couple. Once you put that aspect into the equation, it will become clear why he posts what he posts. 😉
 
I would like to have visitors sooner rather than later, but people on the forum don't seem to have much interest even if they do live within driving distance.
I would if I could, I think it'd be interesting. As you know I don't deny what people say they hear, so many variables. I do think though that:
Listening to the differences is only of any value if they're listened to at home using the listener's usual system over an extended period of time.
certainly for most people due again to all the variables, otherwise it's of academic interest only I think, not why most people would be interested.

I learn more from discussions about speaker directivity than that of cables 🙂
 
Last edited:
Not true. Listening to be sure of the tiniest differences accurately can take a few days. Definitely more than one listening session. Lots of practice helps. For an unskilled listener using poor quality reproduction equipment it might take weeks, months, possibly never hear a difference.

Some differences are obvious enough that they are very quickly recognizable.
Does anyone notice the similarity of Markw4's post with that of mmerrill99's?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.