Bybee Fraud Protection

Status
Not open for further replies.
Jump to Latest
#242
Michael and others, I can understand that you think that Bybee doesn't make any sense and I should not say anything about him. I'm sorry, but I do know the guy and I think that he is for real. I, too, have 'tested' his story for the last 20 years, and I have never found a discrepancy in his conversations with me, as to where he was a student (UCB for grad school), his association with Dick Feynman, or the fact that his Bybee purifiers generally did SOMETHING to the sound of highly evolved audio systems.
Personally, I don't need Jack for my personal reputation as an audio designer. I have that independently, and I am not afraid of others trying to badmouth my reputation for no good reason.
 
#243
The Stereo Times review hits all the correct notes. It doesn't get any better.

We listened to Diana Krall’s “Girl in the Other Room” CD. Her voice became more dimensional, then we put in the 3rd and 4th Enhancers against the crossover networks of his Apogee Duetta loudspeakers. We were both wowed by the increase in soundstage depth and the overall naturalness that enveloped Diana Krall's voice. It was as though a veil had been lifted.
Click to expand...
and
All this for $599! I would certainly qualify this a bargain!
Click to expand...
Perfect! This guy knows how to write 'em. He is also the co-inventor of the Shakti Hallograph, so he knows all about esoteric tweaks.
BYBEE QUANTUM SIGNAL ENHANCER
 
#244
Diana Krall’s “Girl in the Other Room”
Click to expand...

This works on so many levels I'm LMAO.

You can't make this stuff up, well maybe Tom Cruise can.

I've not compared them side by side since the Shakti Stones are, shall I say, "old school." BUT, I would think the Bybee Enhancers would be as effective - if not slightly better - at half the price. Can't beat that!
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
#248
john curl said:
his association with Dick Feynman
Click to expand...

You mean the one that he claims (or you do, hard to tell), but there's no mention of him in anything Feynman wrote?

Stick to besmirching your own reputation and let the great ones who have passed on rest in peace. Trying to splatter some of that horse hockey onto a great physicist and a great man is reprehensible, to even a greater degree than your promotion of fraud.
 
#251
john curl said:
Michael and others, I can understand that you think that Bybee doesn't make any sense and I should not say anything about him. I'm sorry, but I do know the guy and I think that he is for real. I, too, have 'tested' his story for the last 20 years, and I have never found a discrepancy in his conversations with me, as to where he was a student (UCB for grad school), his association with Dick Feynman, or the fact that his Bybee purifiers generally did SOMETHING to the sound of highly evolved audio systems.
Personally, I don't need Jack for my personal reputation as an audio designer. I have that independently, and I am not afraid of others trying to badmouth my reputation for no good reason.
Click to expand...

It is beyond me how anybody can believe anything this Bybee guy says, considering his track record of fraudulent advertisement, downright lying and charlatanism. You must be extremely stupid, extremely cynical or without any integrity. I hope the first.

And it is abhorrent how he desecrates the reputation of people like Feynman for personal gain - why not tell us he worked for JFK? He's dead too and can't sue him either. Its very depressing.

Jan
 
#252
Autosuggestion?

After reading the instructions

I can't believe people believe this..:dunno:

Feynman talked about spin being responsible for the creation of a magnetic field..but the field is made of virtual photons not electrons or protons. So are the instructions saying the bybee makes a magnetic field or that it creates a spin effect in the material in proximity to the bybee via a magnetic field or that there are protons and electrons in the magnetic field produced?

Regards
M. Gregg
 
Last edited:
#258
I have a 'signal enhancer' of my own devising that closely matches the descriptions/instructions/effects of the BSE.
On/under cables/equipment the sonic effects are real and would easily pass the DBLT.
As yet I have not performed measurements and do not have theory explanation but the effects as described for the BSE are fact.
Guys, get with the program, this is possible, and easily implemented.

Dan.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom