Beginner to build an Aleph30 needs some help

Status
Not open for further replies.
Well, I found a shop in France that can make toroïdal trafos on order, here what I'm planning (keeping in mind that I want something not too hungry, but correctly scaled):


Primary: 230Vac

Secondaries:

-60V 0.5A 30va (positive rail)
-19V 1.6A 30.4va (negative rail)
-15V 1.2A 18va (for my selector board)

witch gives me
78.4Vac-->80Va trafo

I'm thinking on adding a electrostatic screen to it, won't hurt I think.

Do you think it's correctly scaled or can I go a little lower? are the voltage correct?
 
I'd probably double its VA rating or use one per channel (may be slightly less expensive to do two on a setup.) At least double the 60V winding rating.

According to Design Notes and Efficiencies | Plitron the transformer will see 1.8x IDC, so a minimum rating is about double the DC power draw. I remember it's 20 mA per channel x 60 VAC, that implies 21.6 VA per channel is the MINIMUM rating. Further down the page you see that even slightly over rating dramatically reduces operating temperature.
 
So I got two solutions:

1-One transformer:

60V 1A 60VA (positive)
19V 2.1A 39.9VA (negative)
15V 1A 15VA (selector)

114.9Vac-->200VA transformer

60.50€

2-Two transformers:

Transformer 1
60V 1A 60Vac-->63VA (positive rail)
26€

Transformer 2
19V 2.4A 45.6va
15V 1A 15va

60.6Vac-->63VA (negative rail + selector)
28.6€

total:54.6€
 
Last edited:
Or look at 60-80VA 2x30V Trafo and if they are cheap take 2 of them.
One for the +rail and one for the -rail.

I had the luck to find trafos for 10€ per pice unbeatable cheap for new 80VA trafos

Whoa 😱 wish I could find such bargains, you've made quite a deal here 😉

Although, I don't need 60V on both rails as the Kari boards are CCS, so I need two different voltage (say 60V on + and 19V on -)

I think I'll stick to a total 120VA trafo (60V/19V/15V), I can get it built for 44€ (by Audiophonics), However Daniel, if you know someplaces where trafo are cheap, I'm all ears😛
 
I know it's to late,

but i say build the BZLS (BOSOZ) stock schematic.

there's something really sweet in it's simplicity, and resistors doing the work of all those extra CCS parts... 😎

and when you run it balanced to balanced it really shines. even when it's converting unbalanced to balanced.

i really don't think it's an inferior preamp... and i'm looking forward to comparing it to my
incoming Pass Labs X2.5 🙂 🙂 🙂
 
I know it's to late,

but i say build the BZLS (BOSOZ) stock schematic.

there's something really sweet in it's simplicity, and resistors doing the work of all those extra CCS parts... 😎

and when you run it balanced to balanced it really shines. even when it's converting unbalanced to balanced.

i really don't think it's an inferior preamp... and i'm looking forward to comparing it to my
incoming Pass Labs X2.5 🙂 🙂 🙂

Do you say that stock schematic will sound better due to it's simpler design?
 
I found a 4ch stepped pot (vishay/Dale) here witch is not to pricey:
Dale 23 Step Serial-Type Balance Potentiometer (Stereo)_Volume Control_Accessories Kit_Analog Metric - DIY Audio Kit
What do you think of it, 10K on the Bosoz output

I also thought about a gear rig to couple two 2ch stepped pots, but it will require quite a lot of work and I'm not really sure this will be as well balanced as with a single pot.

Another solution is using an Alps RK27 4ch pot

look on ebay for same , but with smd resistors

ook Alps
 
trying them all , I refuse to put more greenies in resistive attenuator then on what I wrote - cheap ladder with SMD resistors

that cheap thingie is almost good as best pro conductive plastic audio faders , while only thing which will surpass them , Zen Amount wise , is good AVC

ook is politely written word which you can write here , but it ends as row of stars :rofl:

coupled DACT - need to see exactly on what you meant ; for me - DACT is brand , not type , while ppl are often using the term contrary to that
 
this one
 

Attachments

  • $T2eC16NHJHgE9n0yEjFQBQGP4Lf!WQ~~60_3.JPG
    $T2eC16NHJHgE9n0yEjFQBQGP4Lf!WQ~~60_3.JPG
    30.6 KB · Views: 195
cowneko, i don't think it will sound better, it was designed by Mr. Pass as a teaching example, thus simplified.

But that doesn't mean it should be written off - it's surprising good, especially if played to it's strengths.

Excuse me if my question seemed offending on stock design, that was absolutely not my intention, I don't imply that simplicity equals simplistic (In fact that's often the contrary) 😉
I'll probably build a stock one later (I'll order more than needed parts for one bosoz) so I'll be enjoying both and can make a gift to my Dad (witch is musicaholic too 😀)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.