Babelfish M2/SEF amp

Should the new output be taken from the drain of Q2

and is the pinout looking down on Q2

G D S?

Thinking about doing the mod to my Toshiba M2

Thanks

Bob

nope Bubba

for SEF, output taken directly from source of IRFP9240 (that one in negative rail)

pinout , numbers looking at you , legs down , from left, is always G-D-S

802804d1576597208-babelfish-m2-sef-amp-sef-final-png
 
Schaded M2 up and running

Using Schade 3.5k ohms.
Bias 1.4A
R6s 40k on one channel, 42k on the other

Wide and deep soundstage - tight bass - instruments well placed - smooth -very easy to listen with this amp.

Highly recommended if you don't have access to THF51s or 182s

Hats off to you ZM
 

Attachments

  • IMG_8285.jpg
    IMG_8285.jpg
    499.8 KB · Views: 311
  • IMG_8289.jpg
    IMG_8289.jpg
    582.1 KB · Views: 305
Bob, don't forget to try both speaker polarities. 🙂

indra1

On my Tannoys changing polarities is interesting - there is a subtle difference - original polarity seems a bit warmer to me - sorry I am using a term that may be different for each individual - both are listenable - this may have to be integrated over more listening 😀

Still say that this would be a great amp for a person new to diy
 
N.B. that final development (well, up to my ability) is done in Babelfish M25/SET amp

today I'll do even that one slightly different, putting Schade to upper mosfet

though, only drawback, if it is drawback at all is that 2nd harmonic is positive ( when Schade is in lower rail) , so all you need is to flip speaker polarity to get negative one

construction wise, both cases are challenging in finding small mosfet ( for small Source follower, explained in mentioned thread) with lowish Ugs ; in case of Schade down, solved with TP2640, in case of Schade up, DN2540N5

post #20