Amp Camp Pre+Headphone Amp - ACP+

Yup, nice delivery. As for my own «matching» and jigging for 10mA CCS, I have now achieved 10.02 on one resistor+113 pair and 10.07mA for the other. 0.05mA discrepancy between left and right CCS OK? Prolly a dumb question…

And maybe the answer will be that objectively it’s close enough, and so it is up to me to decide whether it is subjectively good enough. I sometimes feel I am going crazy measuring and matching, and I guess that is just the perfectionist in me pulling my leg :clown:
 
Last edited:
I wnat to thanks Ben Mah for helping me with setting up my ACP + for my HD 650 300 ohm headphones. It only took 2 days to get the resistors needed from Mouser....15 min to remove and install / add...

The HD 650's are a very nice pairing with this amp now..superlative!

Alex

Wanna share the resistor changes, and if possible also the SQ difference between stock and new values on the 600?
 
2sj74

I bought four 2sj74 from a member of this forum. They have all the physical characteristics of the original fet. However, when testing on a multitester, I verified that it has the source on terminal 1, the gate on 2 and the drain on 3, contrary to what is reported in the datasheet. Where did I go wrong? Or does the multitester have some error? Or is the fet not original?
 

Attachments

  • 2sj74.JPG
    2sj74.JPG
    658 KB · Views: 272
  • 2sj74c.JPG
    2sj74c.JPG
    164.3 KB · Views: 270
  • 2sj74e.JPG
    2sj74e.JPG
    136.2 KB · Views: 262
  • 2sj74a.JPG
    2sj74a.JPG
    668.3 KB · Views: 250
Hi, friends!

I have never tried headfi before. Soon I hope my ACP+ will be up and running, and being speakerless at the moment, I am on the lookout for some half el cheapo headphones that wil suit the ACP+.

Audeze, Sennheiser and Hifiman all have reasonably priced alternatives. But if I want something that suits the ACP, what do you recommend I look for wrt specs? Or anyone have any tips for a prime match?

For example, the Hifiman Sundaras are specced at 37 ohms. Seemingly in the ballpark. But with their planar magnetic drivers, they are said to require a bit of power from the amp iot shine, not unusual for such drivers, but… They are stated at 94db sens, but not whether that is at 1mW or 1 volt. A safe alternative would be Sennheiser, but most of them are rated at high impedances. And since buying headphones now, I would like some who shine with the circuit w/o having to change resistor values. So something that is close to the ideal approx 30 ohms is the target. Sundaras also cost a bit more than I would like to throw at them for a first go.

I guess I should take the finished amp around a few shops and test for myself :)

Insight appreciated,

Andy
 
Last edited:
Yes, I eventually sold them. You enlightened me about their shortcomings/wattage and current need, so the thought process has been going ever since. I want flexibility wrt amp choice, ie I want all amps in Papaland to be able to shine with the speakers I eventually choose, in the purest class A, and in the 1 watt range preferably. That goes for Mightyland assortment as well.

Ie I don’t want my speakers to dictate amp choices completely. Fynes wattage needs and insane impedance swings in the bass range limited me to the BA-3 with high voltage rails, and the F5T. Too many great amps to choose from compared to those limitations. And the BA-3 only shone with 60-62 degree heatsinks, and I sorta wanna avoid setting the house on fire. And without room for two amps at the moment, the choice was simple.

As you know well I am targeting Zu’s in the mid term, and Papa OB’s in biamp config in the long term, using a BA-3 sinked with a Sherman tank engine block for bass :rofl:

Like this one:
Ford GAA engine - Wikipedia
 
Last edited:
I bought four 2sj74 from a member of this forum. They have all the physical characteristics of the original fet. However, when testing on a multitester, I verified that it has the source on terminal 1, the gate on 2 and the drain on 3, contrary to what is reported in the datasheet. Where did I go wrong? Or does the multitester have some error? Or is the fet not original?

I had the same problem with that tester. Flip the orentation of the Jfet and test again. You will get the same result. It's the tester. Go by the data sheet
 
Too right, to quote papa from link earlier today:

«Most of the little Jfets l play with, like 2SK170 / 2SJ74, are symmetric, and
you can switch Drain and Source and they work fine, even identically.»

I guess testers are useful for a bunch of reasons. But for matching and jigging / J113+resistor matching, I found the breadboard solution fast, cheap and easy, for starters at least :)
 
I had the same problem with that tester. Flip the orentation of the Jfet and test again. You will get the same result. It's the tester. Go by the data sheet

It's the most likely hypothesis. When I invert the terminals, the result is the same. I have never seen reports of 2sj74 forgeries so perfect. The person who sold me has a 100% positive rating. I also measured the resistance between drain and source and found 25 ohms, within the normal range.
 
Too right, to quote papa from link earlier today:

«Most of the little Jfets l play with, like 2SK170 / 2SJ74, are symmetric, and
you can switch Drain and Source and they work fine, even identically.»

I guess testers are useful for a bunch of reasons. But for matching and jigging / J113+resistor matching, I found the breadboard solution fast, cheap and easy, for starters at least :)

well remembered!