Evening all 🙂
Has anyone experimented with adding small ferrite beads ..
I tried a few clip-on beads around the dac, at the PS input to the Wave IO, and the main feed to the "blue" board, but didn't notice any difference at the time. Mind you I don't have a dedicated supply to the digital side of the PCM1794's, so I wasn't able to test this.
Instresting video on the subject:
https://youtu.be/81C4IfONt3o
Movember again !! Please donate (even a small amount is welcome !!)
OFF TOPIC.... it is Movember again 😎
Like last year, please have a look at the Fund Raising Site from my son Erik. Please donate a small amount if you like my DAC 😀 This is really a good goal (for us Men...)
https://de.movember.com/en/mospace/9946341/
Thanks!
The Movember Foundation
The leading global organisation committed to changing the face of men’s health.
OFF TOPIC.... it is Movember again 😎
Like last year, please have a look at the Fund Raising Site from my son Erik. Please donate a small amount if you like my DAC 😀 This is really a good goal (for us Men...)
https://de.movember.com/en/mospace/9946341/
Thanks!
The Movember Foundation
The leading global organisation committed to changing the face of men’s health.
My 16 decker is working wonderfully up until now so I am starting on a dual 16 deck.
I have built a separate power supply which comprises of 2 x 225 Va 25v transformers into the modified DDDAC power supply which now has 2 x 10000 uf Mundorf caps instead of 4700 uf. The smoothing resistors have been replaced by Lundahl 2733 chokes and the TIP122 changed to a TIP142 to power the decks.
The Wave IO power supply also has the Mundorf caps, the 15v + 15 v transformer unused for the dacs fitted instead of the 9 + 9 v .
I am going to use the Nichicon FPCAP NU series 47uf 50v in place of the 47uf 25v Muse supplied. 710 ordered ....
I am going to use the S Series resistors from Charcroft Electronics for Iref 6k and for the IV conversion I will use the Charcroft VSR range.
I have also bought some Sowter 1 - 1 transformers as I do not need the high output level.
I have built a separate power supply which comprises of 2 x 225 Va 25v transformers into the modified DDDAC power supply which now has 2 x 10000 uf Mundorf caps instead of 4700 uf. The smoothing resistors have been replaced by Lundahl 2733 chokes and the TIP122 changed to a TIP142 to power the decks.
The Wave IO power supply also has the Mundorf caps, the 15v + 15 v transformer unused for the dacs fitted instead of the 9 + 9 v .
I am going to use the Nichicon FPCAP NU series 47uf 50v in place of the 47uf 25v Muse supplied. 710 ordered ....
I am going to use the S Series resistors from Charcroft Electronics for Iref 6k and for the IV conversion I will use the Charcroft VSR range.
I have also bought some Sowter 1 - 1 transformers as I do not need the high output level.
The missing link
Maybe this is off topic but I have to recommend the following component: Intona High Speed USB Isolator. I'm using this little gem for one week with waveIO now and it seems that this is the missing link for USB transport between PC and USB DAC. It gives real galvanic isolation with 480 MBit speed and the sound is fantastic! There is a special version with "NF modification" (LED blinking modified) which is available instead of the standard configuration. Intona-Products
P.S.: I'm not afiliated with that company ...
Maybe this is off topic but I have to recommend the following component: Intona High Speed USB Isolator. I'm using this little gem for one week with waveIO now and it seems that this is the missing link for USB transport between PC and USB DAC. It gives real galvanic isolation with 480 MBit speed and the sound is fantastic! There is a special version with "NF modification" (LED blinking modified) which is available instead of the standard configuration. Intona-Products
P.S.: I'm not afiliated with that company ...
I dont think that is off topic at all.
I have used a similar device for years: https://electronics-shop.dk/isoleret_usb.htm?currency=EUR
Cheap and easy.
Best regards
Arthur.
I have used a similar device for years: https://electronics-shop.dk/isoleret_usb.htm?currency=EUR
Cheap and easy.
Best regards
Arthur.
Galvonic isolation does not mean the device will isolate the down stream device from the computer noise, the layout is critical for any attenuation of PC noise, there is also some noise coupling through the Adum device that they use inside. So these devices do tend to let the HF noise pass, but they do protect against high voltage which is their primary function....
Hers one I did earlier....🙂
http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/pc-based/278547-quick-audioquest-jitterbug-review.html#post4422693
http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/pc-based/278547-quick-audioquest-jitterbug-review.html#post4422693
Galvonic isolation does not mean the device will isolate the down stream device from the computer noise, the layout is critical for any attenuation of PC noise, there is also some noise coupling through the Adum device that they use inside. So these devices do tend to let the HF noise pass, but they do protect against high voltage which is their primary function....
You're surely right that all components and the layout of the pcb is critical. What I've read seems to be done right in every aspect. I'm not an expert in this field and tried a couple of other devices over the years. Nothing comes close to this isolator.
Without looking at the design I couldn't comment... But as said galvanic isolation is for high voltage protection and possible ground loops. The main coupling method for the high frequency noise from a PC is capacitive, this is why when you look at certain DAC/ADC mixed signal design guides where separate analogue and digital powers and grounds are recommended they go to great lengths to advise against any overlap of the separate plains. The Adum devices themselves have a certain amount of capacitive coupling between the input and output (listed on the data sheet) which will also couple some of the HF noise so extra measures and filtering do have to be employed to minimise the noise coupling. The example shown will work quite well at USB 2 full speed as it is only 12MHz, but does have some detrimental effect on the signal integrity, this is very small and would not effect USB 2 full speed but for the full blown USB in the 100s of MHz a bespoke USB hub device or FPGA solution is required. The Adums only do up to 12MHz anyway.
I do this as my day job and the design posted is from some work I have done previously where noise isolation was required as well... 🙂
I do this as my day job and the design posted is from some work I have done previously where noise isolation was required as well... 🙂
usb isolation
Hi Arthur!
Did this thingie work on higher resolutions than 44/16.
What about 24/88, 24/96, 24/192, 24/384? Two channel....
Ed
I dont think that is off topic at all.
I have used a similar device for years: https://electronics-shop.dk/isoleret_usb.htm?currency=EUR
Cheap and easy.
Best regards
Arthur.
Hi Arthur!
Did this thingie work on higher resolutions than 44/16.
What about 24/88, 24/96, 24/192, 24/384? Two channel....
Ed
I think they are using a fpga solution because that's their area of expertise...
Open it up and take a photograph or just have a look...
I suspect one of these at the price and size of the device🙂
http://www.analog.com/media/en/technical-documentation/data-sheets/ADuM4160.pdf
Pretty common for basic USB serial port isolation.
This chip cannot be used because the Intona works with 480 MBit too! I'm feeding the dac with 384 KHz sample rate. I will not open the box because warranty and service will get lost - sorry.
Sorry I missed those, I was looking at the isolator ArthurDK posted (#4925) just after your post. Yes I agree they are probably an FPGA or bespoke USB hub controller, much more substantial than the in line devices.
I may required some help.
I installed the capacitor in order to reduce the "hiss" (quantification noise?).
However I can still here it quite clearly.
Can I do something else to reduce it?
An externally hosted image should be here but it was not working when we last tested it.
I installed the capacitor in order to reduce the "hiss" (quantification noise?).
However I can still here it quite clearly.
Can I do something else to reduce it?
Red: Pos
Black: Common
White: Neg
On the balanced output, I used all 3 wires.
On the unbalanced output, Pos through the CAP 2,2uF and common.
http://www.audio-creative.nl/wp-content/uploads/Uitgangstrafo-voor-de-DDDAC-17941.jpg
http://www.dddac.com/pictures/pics1794/circuits_mainboard_large.png
Black: Common
White: Neg
On the balanced output, I used all 3 wires.
On the unbalanced output, Pos through the CAP 2,2uF and common.
http://www.audio-creative.nl/wp-content/uploads/Uitgangstrafo-voor-de-DDDAC-17941.jpg
http://www.dddac.com/pictures/pics1794/circuits_mainboard_large.png
NEVER use common.
Balanced connection does not need the ground pin to be connected.
Only POS and NEG, and you'll listen.
Balanced connection does not need the ground pin to be connected.
Only POS and NEG, and you'll listen.
Ok modification done.
Acutally did not affected the balanced output due to my wiring on the preamp, however for the unbalanced one, this is better, thank you 🙂.
But the "hiss" is still here.
Actually on a 24 bit file, there is no "hiss", but on a 16, it is there.
I use a raspberry pi with PI core player.
Acutally did not affected the balanced output due to my wiring on the preamp, however for the unbalanced one, this is better, thank you 🙂.
But the "hiss" is still here.
Actually on a 24 bit file, there is no "hiss", but on a 16, it is there.
I use a raspberry pi with PI core player.
- Home
- Source & Line
- Digital Line Level
- A NOS 192/24 DAC with the PCM1794 (and WaveIO USB input)