A new beginning: Optimize a QUAD 405 core

@jxdking

Under these facial and design aspects, I must absolutely agree with you. The typical Quad405 is not a good (illustrative) example of the technology known as CD - and to describe current dumping.

Your approach basically sounds like the Japanese AA concept again.
😎
 
Last edited:
Then I present a preliminary design of my personal 30W Current Dumper, based on the current inspirations of the DIY forum.

1734543196123.png


The amplifier design will be called CD30W.


HBt.
 
1. A low distortion Class A amp that can provide about 50mA current in Class A. If you make the Class A stage in push-pull instead of single ended, you can just half the bias current. With only 25mA, you don't even need to mount it on the main heat sink. A small to-126/to-220 heatsink is sufficient.
Good approach, I'll try it out right away with the slanted design (the framework conditions). See below. This class A approach can be controlled without clipping up to 40Vpp and is intended to represent the feedforward branch.

2. A high current gain dumper with no voltage gain. I am not satisfied the dumper from Quad amps, which was made of "Quasi Complementary". As these days, PNP power transistors are widely available, I recommend using CFP to create a dumper instead.
It is sensible to use the familiar EF-2 approach. It is still missing in my experiment.

3. Combine them with a bridge.
Exactly, and then you can vary the bias and determine exactly which mechanisms are responsible for the effective advertising slogan "current dumper". To do this, we carry out several real-life measurements in the frequency range from 0Hz to 7kHz. Amounts are of secondary importance, we need the real and imaginary components of the respective responsible currents.
 

Attachments

  • CD25W_core.png
    CD25W_core.png
    17.8 KB · Views: 73
The next step is the final stage, a push-pull impedance converter with (instantaneous and optimum bias) Iq=60mAdc.

It is possible that both amplifiers will be equipped with separate (automatic) DC offset corrections.
Once the function test has been passed, the first thing to do is to log the error to be corrected. Then install the bridge ..!
 

Attachments

  • CD25W_A_and_Power B.png
    CD25W_A_and_Power B.png
    27.2 KB · Views: 74
15.5Wrms at 3kHz

Here one can check in advance, even implement as a permanent monitor in the final amplifier (as a display), whether an error-correcting gizmo will bring any dubious gain at all.
If it does not cause any damage, this feature can run with a clear conscience.

The CD25W amplifier does not need this gadget unless the manufacturer wants to advertise it.


HBt.
 
Flip the single end input stage, then I can use the high voltage n-channel mosfet as the input stage. There is no current loss. All the distortion is canceled out.

If you swap out the mosfet with 2n5551, I believe in the real world you would never be able to tell the difference as the current loss at the base of the bjt is usually below 1%. All other parts may have larger variance.
1734834509448.png
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: hbtaudio
Dear
@Bernhard
don't we want to try together with our simulators to get the very best out of this idea of “two independent amplifiers” for the /into Current Dumper-Transformation?

1735567734740.png


What do you think? Does the concept have enough potential to correct the very last bit of garbage out of the distortion bed using feedforward?

greetings,
HBt.
 
My little dumper:
not bad, but not particularly exorbitant either, just different 😵 😍.
 

Attachments

  • THD3k_3W.png
    THD3k_3W.png
    8.6 KB · Views: 30
  • THD3k_50mW.png
    THD3k_50mW.png
    8 KB · Views: 31
  • Current Dumper freq.png
    Current Dumper freq.png
    57 KB · Views: 39
  • my little current dumper.png
    my little current dumper.png
    31.4 KB · Views: 43
  • THD3k_24W.png
    THD3k_24W.png
    8.6 KB · Views: 37