A good single sided PCB for bridged LM4780?

Status
Not open for further replies.
mightydub said:
😀 :smash:

But don't even try. It is next to impossible. Due to the pin layout you have to pass power traces in between pins that are much too narrowly spaced for the required trace width. People, who know how to make a single-sided version for the LM4780 also know that it makes no sense.

If you want a two-channel IC that can be implemented on a single-sided PCB, use the LM1876 (2 x 20 W), the LM4765 (2 x 30 W) or the LM4766 (2 x 40 W) without connecting the mute and stand-by functions. Else use a double-sided PCB or two LM3886.
 
impossible is nothing my friend...

pacificblue said:

😀 :smash:

But don't even try. It is next to impossible. Due to the pin layout you have to pass power traces in between pins that are much too narrowly spaced for the required trace width. People, who know how to make a single-sided version for the LM4780 also know that it makes no sense.

impossible is nothing my friend...check this out , i have made a dozens of this at home..

http://diygainclone.blogspot.com/2008/07/evolution-of-pcbs-for-lm4780-based.html
 
Re: Re: impossible is nothing my friend...

pacificblue said:

On the other hand using jumpers is cheating, is it not? 😉

no dear, cheating to whom?.. the purpose should me solved. it was difficult to get double sided blank PCB at my place and even if i get one, it is more difficult to match top and bottom layer for correct hole drilling,

but here using jupers, i achieved very good results, but there are no jumpers in the signal path, i had only 4 jumpers in my final layout, which i feel is quite a decent number keeping simplicity of layout in mind.
 
bridged and paralleled

Ulew said:
Is it bridged?


Mmm, theoritically the same PCB can be used, but i had never tried. it may look like this, but you please check it thoroughly.
 

Attachments

  • 4780bridged.jpg
    4780bridged.jpg
    61.2 KB · Views: 834
Re: Re: Re: impossible is nothing my friend...

kuldeepsingh said:
no dear, cheating to whom?.. the purpose should me solved. it was difficult to get double sided blank PCB at my place and even if i get one, it is more difficult to match top and bottom layer for correct hole drilling,

but here using jupers, i achieved very good results, but there are no jumpers in the signal path, i had only 4 jumpers in my final layout, which i feel is quite a decent number keeping simplicity of layout in mind.
Cheating in the sense that the jumpers make it effectively double-sided.

Please don't take offense. I've seen pictures of your amplifier and I am quite impressed with your work. Especially because I know after a few visits to India that the circumstances are much less favorable for such a hobby than they are e. g. here in Europe. This PCB is another example of how resourceful and ingenious you work around any obstacles you encounter.

ratza said:
This means that also using dual layer PCB is cheating, as it serves the same purpose: the shortest routes as possible. Isn't it? 😀
I started with the remark that it was next to impossible to make a single-sided PCB for the LM4780. kuldeepsingh said he had one. Your remark shows me that you also think that jumpers make it quasi double-sided.
 
If you don't have the knowledge to find that out by yourself, you should consider reading and learning a bit first. Then start by building a standard application. You may find that you don't need more output power than that can deliver.

If you find afterwards that you do need more power (=more SPL), you can still bridge later on. But remember that you get four times as much output power in bridged mode ->
  • - you need four times as big a power supply.
    - you need four times as much heatsinking.
    - you might run into heatsinking limits, especially with the LM4780 (AN-1192 again!).
    - find out, if your speakers can mechanically cope with that amount of power or if you only raise distortion and risk destruction.

Must read and understand:
  • - datasheet for LM4780 or any other IC you want to use.
    - AN-1192 on bridging and thermal considerations.
    - Linkwitz homepage on SPL, excursion limits, power requirements.
    - etc.
 
pacificblue said:
If you don't have the knowledge to find that out by yourself, you should consider reading and learning a bit first. Then start by building a standard application. ........................................... IC you want to use.
- AN-1192 on bridging and thermal considerations.
- Linkwitz homepage on SPL, excursion limits, power requirements.
- etc.[/list]
very good advice, including all I edited out.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.