• WARNING: Tube/Valve amplifiers use potentially LETHAL HIGH VOLTAGES.
    Building, troubleshooting and testing of these amplifiers should only be
    performed by someone who is thoroughly familiar with
    the safety precautions around high voltages.

4xKT88 into Hammond 1650T, what am I missing?

Status
Not open for further replies.
These are from something I did 10years ago (or more).
I would probably do things a little different today.

The document is some notes on the design and some test results.
The pdf is teh amp schematic.
The jpg is the power supply schematic.

"DUD" is a bit of poking fun at myself - stands for "Down Under Designs".

Cheers,
Ian
 

Attachments

  • dud120.pdf
    dud120.pdf
    86.3 KB · Views: 230
  • Lowish Cost Big Valve Amplifier.doc
    Lowish Cost Big Valve Amplifier.doc
    54 KB · Views: 194
  • DUD120-PS.jpg
    DUD120-PS.jpg
    449.5 KB · Views: 487
my power amps are just based on more traditional GEC multipair 400watts,
whit valves power supply for Hi-Fi, sound beautyfull.
only the power supply its different from Woodville schematics.
450/0/450VAC supply 4X 5C3S (5U3C)
the main choke its 5H 500mA for +B 530V a rest and 480V a full power,
it was too small for choke filter so i need to put 47uF/900V (conbination =// of 4X 47uF-450V) on head before and two siemens 390uF/450V // (195uF-900V) for +B , followed by 20H 100mA for 450V +B2 splitter and 10H50mA for 250V +B3 class A input tube .
for -B G1 silicon bridge and BC 200uF/200V and Roderstein 470uF/100V.
 
These are from something I did 10years ago (or more).
I would probably do things a little different today.

The document is some notes on the design and some test results.
The pdf is teh amp schematic.
The jpg is the power supply schematic.

"DUD" is a bit of poking fun at myself - stands for "Down Under Designs".

Cheers,
Ian
i like very much the splitter for yours amp, can you develop please, any measurement photo a low frequency below 100 Hz???
my next amp will have different splitter, the GEC cathodyne its a little poor!
 

Attachments

  • 100Hz square.JPG
    100Hz square.JPG
    310.1 KB · Views: 398
  • P1060086p.JPG
    P1060086p.JPG
    338.6 KB · Views: 369
  • P1060088p.JPG
    P1060088p.JPG
    321.2 KB · Views: 361
That ringing on the 100Hz squarewave...is a sign of trouble and requires a bit more circuit examination, esp the schematic. Even the 30Hz on the tips is suspect.
this RINGING come from FLASH CARD RECORDER not from the amp, just for
the last two photos are from balanced line bypassing input and splitter,
my signal generator only unbalanced output.
difference from unbalanced and balanced 100 Hz its evident
the sinus 30Hz a 50% power supply its much better in balanced mode,
the cathodyne splitter its not perfect at very low frequency
 
Well, first you have to realize it's a mono block, so you'll need two of them 🙂
Personally, I would simplify a few things:
- Get rid of the recitifier tubes and just use solid state diodes
- Remove V6A/V6B (cathode followers). You won't go AB2. Not necessary and saves a tube.
- 10k gridstopper seems a bit excessive for V4A. Adds white noise and not necessary since it's a hifi amp.
- I don't really see the point in dropping the voltage that much for V4A. Pushes the loadlines to the more non-linear regions. And with a 56uF filtercap, a 100k dropping resistor isn't required either.
- Concerning layout. The KT88's seem really close together. Datasheets state 4 inches apart, measured from the center.
That, at first glance.
 
Thanks, but I have to disagree. Merlin Blencowe and Morgan Jones, two authors I hold in very high regard, both agree composite curves are somewhat 'overkill' for drawing the power stage loadlines. Reasons being a speaker is not pure resistance and valves are not perfect. Treating half the PP output as single ended and then converting the outcome to full PP requirements is enough to create a basic picture. And this is supported when drawing up the loadlines with the given values on e.g. the Genalex KT88 datasheet for the AB1 ultra linear fixed bias configuration (98W vs 100W given in the sheet).
Oh my God!😀
It really doesn't take too much if you just print out two plate curves pictures and match them properly for a given bias point to get the composite tube. Drawing a bunch of straight lines passing through few calculated points in the relevant working area is really easy and quick (Or I should say it's easy and quick once one knows how to do it). High accuracy is useless as datasheet curves only represent average tube and determining things on paper is not so accurate on its own, regardless SE or PP topology. You can get a very good agreement only if you have the real curves of your actual tubes and build a perfectly matching model to those.

Anyway, one thing is a proper loudspeaker for a tube amplifier and another thing is how it will behave into a variable load. No speaker is a resistive load but this doesn't mean tube amp will not work properly and no assumptions can be made to get the best out of it. A typical and properly designed PP tube amp will certainly have no trouble driving a proper tube speaker and behave as a nearly constant power source which means that for some change in secondary load (typically from 5 to 9 ohm for nominal 8 ohm load) the power delivery will not change a lot. Typically will be down or up by 10-15% respect to the nominal load in that load range. Of course this is just the typical trend and depends on the design.
The PP amp suffers much less than a SE a variable load if designed to cope with it.

So the question still stands, why are there so many PPP designs with 1650T (Z=1900 a-a) type configuration and 4 KT88's while the power outputs from the valves will far exceed the xformers ratings when pushed to full signal swing?? Headroom? Keeping away from 0V on G1? Margin for NFB??
Power rating of Hammond OT's is not very clear. Anyway if they are rated 120W at 30Hz then they can cope with 200W down to 38Hz. Not a big deal....
 
Last edited:
Thanks, but that's a response to a post almost two years old and given the current circumstances and knowledge gained, not really relevant anymore 😀
This thread took the turn to look at other similar (relatively) high power designs.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.