3/4 + 3/4 the strange A1

The Philips made BC types indicated as low noise are more noisy than Philips made BC327/BC337. Measured this long ago and it surprised me. Just like seeing the noisy ones in new designs.

When it is about low noise ZTX851/951 seem superior from what I read here.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hbtaudio
@jean-paul

But that's very exciting, I assumed for almost 40 years that the BC5xx form declared as low-noise is really the low-noise form /device. With the ZTX versions it is clear. Now you've given me a brain teaser. Ice_max 1A vs. 0.2A is one of the most striking fixed parameters. What are the main differences between the two PSPICE models?

thx
 
My guess is that the base track resistors of both types differ significantly and that therefore, depending on the complex source impedance, sometimes the BC3x7 is the more advantageous choice.

Since “3/4 + 3/4” must be driven with low impedance, the input (in our case) will see approximately a 600Ohm source. In the original MF-A1 it is 3k3 ..! Thanks for the tip, CLG is less than 19dB (very strong negative feedback!), nothing should go wrong with the thermal noise.
 
But that's very exciting, I assumed for almost 40 years that the BC5xx form declared as low-noise is really the low-noise form /device.
Yes it are assumptions based on the datasheet but reality really is different. Or was different as it was measured long ago and AFAIK only those by Philips as these were good parts. Funny thing is that I still have the BC327/BC337 from that lot.

No idea about PSPICE. Never simulated anything and never will.
 
Here is a quick picture of my component assembly.
 

Attachments

  • fast fertig.png
    fast fertig.png
    4 MB · Views: 23
  • Like
Reactions: wahab and StevieK