I can see that you are using coherent averaging. I am sure that you know that this method makes FFT plots look better than they really are, regarding noise floor. It still measures (THD and THD+N numbers) properly, however an inexperienced reader may be fascinated by the low noise floor, which is both false regarding noise density and mains spuriae.
Yes, I know and that’s why amplifier's noise floor was measured by the proper method (post #4). I implore anyone to point out an amplifier with lower output noise. Noise floor is about 25 nV/rtHz.
Not to mention that considerable part of measured noise is not form the amplifier output, rather by EMI incursion into non professional level measurement gear.
Coherent averaging was used to reveal low high order distortion harmonics. Check post #423. 🙂
Not to mention that considerable part of measured noise is not form the amplifier output, rather by EMI incursion into non professional level measurement gear.
Coherent averaging was used to reveal low high order distortion harmonics. Check post #423. 🙂
Did you measure the THD on the real amp?
When I looked into BJT vs Lateral Mosfet, I always found contradictory information. Is Lateral Mosfet actually better than BJT?
When I looked into BJT vs Lateral Mosfet, I always found contradictory information. Is Lateral Mosfet actually better than BJT?
Of course.
I’m sure you know that there is no general answer to that, rather it depends on application and design.
For this specific design, lateral MOSFETs were superior to BJTs. The same design, only with a CFP output was actually built, listened to and measured.
What makes them better is not all in that table. It’s about Ic/Vce curves.
