OPA1637 enable/disable transients

I missed those Marcel, I did look for them but didn't see them ...
In the mean time I rigged up a test on the OPA637 eval module I found back in my 'stuff' box...
There seems to be a transient when coming out of disable, and the disable doesn't fully suppress the signal (probably still leaks through the input/feedback resistors).
So it doesn't really look useful as a mute function.

Jan
 

Attachments

  • OPA1637 enable.mp4
    15.5 MB
  • OPA1637 disable.mp4
    11.9 MB
OPA1632 and OPA1633 have enable pins. The datasheet states this:
When disabled, the output stage is not in a high-impedance state.

OPA1637 has power down pin. According to datasheet:
In the power-down state, the amplifier outputs are in a high-impedance state
 
In differential applications at least I've found that series resistors and jfets across the output does a good job of muting in 1632. (The idea is not original.)

1694273201113.png


There are other jfets with lower RDS which might work better than the ones I used (which I could get at the time) J112? IIRC
 
Last edited:
H'm... neither good nor bad then? Innocuous as a connecting line between circuit elements in a simulator?I

Okay... is the OPA1632 much lesser than the OPA1633? In what way is the OPA1633 great? From a technical perspective?
 
Last edited:
You wonder why they would bother to create a new device...maybe just increased the operating currents of the input pair a bit? Or perhaps the fakes (the OPA1632 from China) are in such mass abundance they can't sell the originals?
 
Last edited:
There seems to be a transient when coming out of disable, and the disable doesn't fully suppress the signal (probably still leaks through the input/feedback resistors).
So it doesn't really look useful as a mute function.
According to the data sheet it's a power down pin and not a mute pin. So I would expect the purpose to be power savings rather than muting.

Tom
 
  • Like
Reactions: jan.didden