Opinions on a potential 3 way using some older drivers

Just updating this old thread. I was completely disappointed with the performance Audex drivers so I gave up on this project and gave the drivers away. I decided to explore in a new direction for me. I've always used ribbon or AMT tweeters with metal woofers in mostly 3 way designs. For a complete change up I decided to design a 2 way with a fabric dome tweeter and a paper woofer. I understand this is a very common approach, but new to me. I will be creating a new thread in the near future but here a a sneak preview. A gated frequency response measurement and a photo of the completed speakers with the grills off.




I'm planning to use up some drivers I have to design a 3 way to give as a gift. I'm trying not to buy too many more drivers because I have too many now. Here is what I have to work with.

2 Audax HM170Z0 aurogel 6.5 inch mid-woofer. 8 ohm 91 db
2 Audax HM130Z0 aurogel 5.25 inch mid. 8 ohm 92 db
2 Audax HM100X2 poly 4 inch mid. 8 ohm 94 db

I think the 6.5 and the 4 inch would be best, but one of the 4 inch mids has a 1 inch crack in the cone and I don't see a way to fix it. I'm concerned the 5.25 inch mid is too big to pair with the 6.5 inch mid woofer. These seem to be high quality drivers and are from the same product line. I also have some poly cell drivers from some scraped Infinity RS8B that I might try. Ultimately I might have to buy a pair of mids and tweeters and use the 5.25 an the poly cell for some two ways.
 

Attachments

  • BRF-27B Gated.jpg
    BRF-27B Gated.jpg
    235.2 KB · Views: 95
  • BRF-27B Competed.jpg
    BRF-27B Competed.jpg
    192.9 KB · Views: 105
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: jawen
That crack can be fixed. A bit tricky, but it can be done with special epoxy. Regular adhesives won't stick to PP.

The HM130Z0 would be my choice and do a 3 way. Nothing wrong with a 2 way, just isn't as refined in the upper mids compared to a 3 way.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jawen
I might just use the HM130Z0, I made my first draft of the baffle. It is 13 inch by 19 inch with a 1.5 inch chamfer all the way around. I'm thinking of using an SB29SDAC tweeter unless someone else can suggest something better. As to fixing the crack on the HM100X2, I will pass, but if anyone wants to try I will give them the pair for free.
 

Attachments

For reference, check this demo project made in VituixCad2 by Kimmo Saunisto.
It's a 3-way with a HM170Z18, a 4" Vifa M10MD and a Peerless D27 tweeter.
https://kimmosaunisto.net/Software/VituixCAD/Epe-3W_demo.zip
I looked over your v2 version, here is what I have so far, how close did I get?

Woofer crossed at 575 Hz with a low pass LR2
Mid crossed at 500 Hz with a high pass LR2, 2800 Hz low pass BW3 plus a series notch at 1800 with a Q = 1.75
Tweeter at 2600 with a high pass BW3

These are the acoustic slopes, not the electrical slopes. What you did with the mid is interesting. You added the series notch to flatten out the frequency response between 1KHz and 2.5Khz which don't show on the raw driver. I suspect the cause is the high pass and low pass components are two close in frequency causing the resonance that the notch is fixing. I would cross the woofer to mid lower, closer to 300 Hz and cross mid to tweeter higher. The books say to make the high pass 8 to 10 times higher than the low pass. I prefer 10 times to keep the two filters from interfering with each other. Thanks for the help.
 
Here is a picture of the test cabinet and a real rough frequency response from a simulated crossover. Just to see if it has any chance of working, I made some on axis measurements in my 10' by 10' office. The room clearly dominates the measurements so I used ERB smoothing. Next step will be using a DSP to simulate a crossover and give it a listen, if it seems OK I will then drag everything outside for some better measurements.
 

Attachments

  • 20230424_150308.jpg
    20230424_150308.jpg
    237.1 KB · Views: 81
  • scrapper-v2-r2.jpg
    scrapper-v2-r2.jpg
    189.4 KB · Views: 74
I'm trying the offset tweeter in an attempt to smooth out the edge diffraction. It was an an old-school method, Once I moved the tweeter towards one edge I decided what the hell, offset the mid. I may abandon this approach when I make the real enclosures. In line will be easier to build, the offset mid's internal enclosure will be simpler to build. I have the power amp and DSP connected, just need to configure the DSP.
 
Looks like I'm going to give up all together or just make a two way. The HM130Z0 is the problem. It has a huge dip in response (5db) between 800 and 1600 hz. At first I thought was the quick measurements I made, but yesterday I brought the test cabinet outside and it was still there. Maybe it is from sitting around for 30 years? Here is what I'm talking about.
 

Attachments

  • HM130Z0.jpg
    HM130Z0.jpg
    173.5 KB · Views: 69
  • Like
Reactions: motokok