Acoustic Horn Design – The Easy Way (Ath4)

Missed edit window...
One thing i do feel confident about, is that notch frequency is not determined by distance to CD diaphragm....

Here's raw response of mid ports on a 90x60 syn
where Red is with the CD mounted in place,
and Blue is with the CD off the horn.......so with mid ports reflecting to an empty hole. (1.4" CD hole)


syn10 tof mid with CD on blue  off red.JPG

Impulse ToF's were within 0.02ms. (1 sample at 48kHz)
 
but might be that sound is just "lazy".
Might be not far from truth - I would put it that once the dimension of the cross section is small enough (with respect to WL), the sound wave already reflects without "examining" further details of the apex. It's just that the details of the very end are no longer important - too small to matter.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Petter Persson
Could it be that rapid change in cross section area cause diffraction, as in every discontinuity? Diffraction would be reflection in this case since the wave length is large compared to the diameter of the wg and the space is constrained.

This would explain why the notch gets higher than calculated. Same theory would apply inside a phase plug. Whether you get reflection or not from the face plug surface depends on how well the plug expansion match the throat and wg expansion.
 
Might be not far from truth - I would put it that once the dimension of the cross section is small enough (with respect to WL), the sound wave already reflects without "examining" further details of the apex. It's just that the details of the very end are no longer important - too small to matter.

That idea has some intuitive appeal. It made me reexamine the same measurement I made on the low ports this morning.
Low ports are 7.5cm dia, and about 18.5cm from CD axially, 23cm from CD on horn walls. 10" drivers.

Green is with CD on; orange is with CD off.
syn10 tof low with CD on green off orange.JPG

Dunno what to think.
 
ST260-alike, the same axial distance of the taps (40mm, surface sources only), three different throat diameters (12.7, 25.4 and 36 mm).

1676400157839.png
1676399959083.png
1676400199835.png


Vertical polars:
ST260MEH-T12.png
ST260MEH-T25.png
ST260MEH-T36.png


At first counter-intuitive, perhaps, but obviously real - the smaller the throat, the less time it takes the reflection (or whatever it is) to happen.

I'm tempted to try it with an open end but that would require some more coding and I'm as lazy as the sound, if not more at the moment...
 
Last edited:
You mean off like removed? If so, it makes perfect sense.

Green curve has a deeper notch since the reflection is from both the somewhere in the driver and from the waveguide. In the orange case, the reflection only occurs from the change in expansion rate of the waveguide.
Yes, off as in CD totally removed. And I agree with what you say makes sense.

When I said dunno what to think, it was in regards to the idea that when get wavelengths long enough relative to size of the apex, that that might define the location of an apparent reflective apex.

But the low ports are showing a difference around 700Hz, CD on vs CD off, that the mid ports don't.
Doesn't appear to support the idea.
 
The throat elements a) reflective and b) 100% absorptive:

View attachment 1142805View attachment 1142806 View attachment 1142807
Could you fill the whole area between throat and midrange port with absorption? The compression driver only needs to pass it once and with a little eq it can compensate for the loss. But the midrange is traveling double the distance thru the absorption.

This is of course something Mr Geddes know a lot more about, he even has a patent.
 
  • Like
Reactions: deanznz