Useful for speaker cabinet fill?

Cotton is used as an absorbent in loudspeaker enclosures.

1668466264223.png


Natural cotton fibres actually provide sound absorption that is comparable to that of rock wool and fibreglass.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ixnay
There are issues...

What is the balance 40% material?
There are problems with natural fibers attracting fungus, mold, insects, moisture and so on, depending on your climate.
If that is the case, maybe the hollow polyester fibers used in stuffing pillows would be a better choice. Or the acrylic fiber used in fabric and blankets.

Comments from the members with actual experience if such, let us say, house hold materials, rather than industrial materials like glass wool will be most appreciated.
 
I used a wool/cotton mixture in my sealed enclosures.

Those who have ported enclosures and live in warm, humid climates may be advised to use a purely synthetic absorbent material such as BAF wadding, although its performance is not as good as a natural material.

A natural material, like wool, is a more effective absorber because of the random orientation of its fibres.
 
I used a wool/cotton mixture in my sealed enclosures.

Those who have ported enclosures and live in warm, humid climates may be advised to use a purely synthetic absorbent material such as BAF wadding, although its performance is not as good as a natural material.

A natural material, like wool, is a more effective absorber because of the random orientation of its fibres.
Should also be possible to seal the port with plastic on the inside. Like a plastic bag but slightly thicker. Thin enough to transmit sound but thick enough to not be easily damaged.
 
Wool is by far the best performimg cabinet dampening material from a sound perspective. It just sounds better in most types of enclosures, specifically sealed boxes that aren't fully stuffed and ported boxes. You don't need as much for effective dampening which won't bulk up as much to hurt airflow to the port. If you do stuff the box completely with it, you will get more virtual increase in volume compared to other materials. Fiberglass and Rockwood aren't as linear across the entire frequency range, especially in the low end. Cotton isn't bad either but still not as good overall as wool.
 
Wool is by far the best performimg cabinet dampening material from a sound perspective. It just sounds better in most types of enclosures, specifically sealed boxes that aren't fully stuffed and ported boxes.
The problem(s) with wool are; a) it's bloody expensive, b) it is not readily available in forms useful for cabinet fill, and c) as loose fill, it settles unless suspended/held in place by threading it through netting or some similar arrangement.

I may still have the graph of absorption vs freq measurements of various materials I made years ago, will post if I can find it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: availlyrics
True regarding the availability of useful formats of wool. It has to be bound in a certain thickness and density to work optimally. The loose stuff is harder to find. Other versions often are bound with a certain amount of other fiber to stabilize and make it more uniform, but that doesn't usually affect its properties enough to matter. I have used grille cloth to hold loose wool in place in high flow areas of the cab ie close to ports.

A big potential issue with fiberglass and rockwool is how easy it can get into the driver VC gap over time if the spl and vibration is significant enough to push and break away the fibers. I've reconed driver's that were used in sub cabinets damped with alot of FG and the VC windings were covered in it to the point it acted as an abrasive to the VC winding enamel and the inner VC former. It also embeds itself in the surround and spiders. Its just nasty stuff. It is cheap and relatively effective as a dampening material which is probably why people like to use it. I just would use it in a vented cab.