LM1875 Bi-amp

Instead of building an amp with a separate OpAmp XO you can eliminate the need for that by wrapping the XO around the LM1875.

I can read and recognize an active XO but designing one would be a task for me (doable but…), there are many examples and many here with very solid skills at this.

My active XOs tend toward simple PLLXOs, in my ACA a simple change to a smaller input cap makes it into a midTweeter amplifier.

But if you need something faster (what are the speakers you wish to use?) something like a 2nd order or even a 3rd order SallenKey can be wrapped around the LM1875.

If you take this approach, the amplifiers do become dedicated.

dave
 
I would like to build something like studio monitors and when i saw the schematics of some monitors that are selling, they are using another opamp to divide the frequencies to each amp. But you say that i can play full range signal to both and than use passive ox?
 
Apologies
I still think he should have got his basics right, that was a basic question.
2.1 populated board kits with 3 x 2030A are very cheap here..
Easy to make the amp, add power transformer, and signal in
Rectifier and smoothing caps are included.

Childishly simple, hence my comment..
4.1, 2.0 and 5.1 kits are also common.
 
Joined today.
Spoon feed a possible troll?
No way...

His questions are basic idiot savant type, like a kid in high school.
He must read up, decide what is needed, go for it.
No mention of speaker ratings, either.

1875 is many years old, it will take a long time just to read the existing threads about it.
Hi, I'm sorry if I wrote something wrong, I'm from the Czech Republic so I don't know much English so it's possible that I wrote something stupid. However, yes, I have recently sign up Because I've been trying to solve it myself all along, but since the chip is old, there is lots of different things about this chip, so I don't know what's best.
 
Welcome to this great forum. Your English is perfectly fine. No need to say sorry! For Active Xover design you should visit Rod elliot page.


lm1875 silicon chip.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: JMFahey
Decide output need.
That will tell how many chips needed, 1875 is good to 32W, more than enough for most homes.

Single chip is enough then, 2 chips not needed.
Read the app notes and so on.
Then go ahead.
Yes, but i already have 18-0-18V trafo so that means 25-0-25V after rectification and according to datasheet i can get around 20w from one chip. I have 25w woofer and 25w tweeter so its fine to use one chip per speaker right?
 
I will suggest you to use a bridged amplifier for bass/woofer and a single ended for treble. Of course if the speakers are 8Ω minimum.
You need a larger voltage excursion for bass. There are several examples for schematics like thin on the forum.
 
Great suggestion, it always needs more power in woofer section.
My suggestion would be to go slow and modular. Rather then build all on one board, make active crossover first. Line in, two lines out. Check its performance with well working other amplifiers. Then build those amplifiers based on LM1875. Test independently. Then use.

Long time ago I used something like this, its 2.1 amp, for sub and two bookshelf. It was easy to use, made just few small mods to suit my application.
https://www.parts-express.com/Yuan-Jing-LM1875-2.1-Audio-Amp-Board-2-x-25W-50W-Y24-320-6510
 
Before you start working at the crossover I suggest to do first measurements with the final speakers in final box. You need to know exactly the type of crossover (not only the crossover point) and to implement, if is necessary, some adițional filtering like a notch filter.
 
Start with one chip amp, see how it suits your needs, then improve it by putting two chip amps.

Bridged would mean 40W into a 25W speaker, I would not do that. Risk of burning is too much.

Later you can try 20W per speaker, if you need louder levels.