audio cables

Lower mass comes to mind...

I read there is another advantage, which you may be able to confirm.

Aluminum wire requires more cross sectional area to do the same job as copper wire, but this can have an advantage in a voice coil when it comes to the length of the coil windings.

An aluminum coil of the same impedance as copper will end up with a longer winding length, increasing the Xmax number.
 

Attachments

  • Cu and Al Voice Coils.jpg
    Cu and Al Voice Coils.jpg
    21.4 KB · Views: 81
I was thinking that #28 or thinner stuff, but yes I could be a high estimate.
#28 AWG is 65 ohm per 1000 ft (305m) so 2 meters amount to 0.43 ohm or 0.9 ohm for a 2 wire cable.

At 7X intrinsic resistance, iron would be 6.3 ohm.

Both ridiculously small values compared to circuit impedance, so even in that extreme case, difference will be INAUDIBLE.
 
I read there is another advantage, which you may be able to confirm.

Aluminum wire requires more cross sectional area to do the same job as copper wire, but this can have an advantage in a voice coil when it comes to the length of the coil windings.

An aluminum coil of the same impedance as copper will end up with a longer winding length, increasing the Xmax number.
Well, that´s not really an advantage but a handicap, since it forces you to have a larger winding length, like it or not.

The real disadvantage of aluminum is that needing more wire section to compensate for increased resistivity winding thickness increases, so needing wider gaps, so becoming magnetically less efficient.
You waste more of the possible magnet strength.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bucks bunny
Thought for the day: Why are hyper-expensive interconnects needed for music reproduction when they are not used in the recording process?
Good thinking! But also notice what IS used for recoding. Purpose-specific cables designed for audio from manufacturers like Canare and Mogami that have met safety and quality control standards. Not leftover wire, steel cable or aluminum.
 
for playback we want the very best parts and equipment so we can extract and hear more from the recording, this regardless if the recording is done with only junk and farts or not
Wel, the very best for audio from engineering standpoint of view is RG59 (coax cable) like used in the most precise testing gear like the absolute toplevel "Audio Precision Audio Analysers' (the APx555). RG59 cable on rolls comes at less than 1$/€ per meter cable. Ad hgh quality connectors (like Neutrik) to it and you got the best that exist from engineering standpoint. But they don't look as fancy as the "audiphile cables" that you like.
 
Wel, the very best for audio from engineering standpoint of view is RG59 (coax cable) like used in the most precise testing gear like the absolute toplevel "Audio Precision Audio Analysers' (the APx555). RG59 cable on rolls comes at less than 1$/€ per meter cable. Ad hgh quality connectors (like Neutrik) to it and you got the best that exist from engineering standpoint. But they don't look as fancy as the "audiphile cables" that you like.
Coax is for unbalanced and digital systems. Twisted pair is the standard for balanced systems, which most studios use.

https://mogamicable.com/category/bulk/snake/

Your music has already been thru a 100' of this I'm sure your 2' of audiophool cable will make a difference.
 
If we're trying to be perfectly Fair here oh, our systems were capable of the utmost resolution. They were open Windows to the truth.
Or maybe they were badly engineered with high output impedance ("audiophile" tube preamp with 12AX7, output taken from the anode, too much gain, too much Zout, yet popular) and/or marginally stable and therefore easily upset by minor differences in cable parasitics that wouldn't bug anything less "fancy"?