Yes, you are absolutely right, NE123 is a true 4" speaker and its Sd is the main atribute of this. Fixed that too
"Measurements" are just "dry" measurements, no more.
HiFiCompass "mark" is my personal subjective rating of a specific speaker driver. It takes in account the following factors:
- objective technical measurements
- subjective listening impressions
- applicability
- the price
- any others, which have much less weight
There is no a precise formula connecting all these factors. A speaker may be very simple and cheap, has ordinary measurements but at the same time have quite good sound and incredible perfomance/price ratio. I applaud the manufacturer - 5 stars:
Vifa OC25SC65-04 | HiFiCompass
Another case, there is a much better sounding and technically more impressive speaker, but having a technical flaw (resonance at 8.5 kHz), which is unacceptable for its price. So, just 4 stars:
Accuton BD25-6-258 | HiFiCompass
There is no a precise formula connecting all these factors. A speaker may be very simple and cheap, has ordinary measurements but at the same time have quite good sound and incredible perfomance/price ratio. I applaud the manufacturer - 5 stars:
Vifa OC25SC65-04 | HiFiCompass
Another case, there is a much better sounding and technically more impressive speaker, but having a technical flaw (resonance at 8.5 kHz), which is unacceptable for its price. So, just 4 stars:
Accuton BD25-6-258 | HiFiCompass[/QUOTE]
Accuton BD25-6-258 - that is so bloody ordinary ! And you are testing the better sample at that price the pair should be a perfect match
Vifa OC25SC65-04 | HiFiCompass
Another case, there is a much better sounding and technically more impressive speaker, but having a technical flaw (resonance at 8.5 kHz), which is unacceptable for its price. So, just 4 stars:
Accuton BD25-6-258 | HiFiCompass[/QUOTE]
Accuton BD25-6-258 - that is so bloody ordinary ! And you are testing the better sample at that price the pair should be a perfect match
Yes, there is such a problem that we will solve in the coming months. I'm sorry for inconvenience.
Please let me know your username and e-mail that you specified when registering your account.
It could be polemic but did you consider a subjective better sound classement (so without Q/P ratio) for instance: drivers marked by a star per what is making Humble Homemade >Hifi for his subjective prefered capacitors. As an illustration you already said you liked a lot the Elipticor mid for you daily speakers...and so on ?!
With what the site offers, I think such a feature would actually be a negative.
So, you want to tell us that SB, Scan, Seas,Morel, Eton, Visaton, Accuton, Peerless, HiVi, TB,and many others, don't have their own engineering?
Some of the ones you're naming right now, no they don't.
In fact, a couple of them use the same 3rd party company. *
Some of them do a bit of a mixed bag, and some even have quite a bit of rebranding.
Is that such a weird new information?
I thought that was like known for many years.
* For the engineering parts, production is something else again.
Last edited:
B_Force is right regarding the engineering. Additionally, it is widely known for years that many of the driver components, such as. e,g many Scan Speak parts (surrounds, cones), are sourced from Dr. Kurt Müller in Krefeld. The slit SS cones come straight from Müller. Nowadays the Chinese are more and more producing these components. On other words, all forms of outsourcing, including engineering, have been widely used in the audio industry for decades. It must be said that SS, Seas and Vifa/Tympany do most of the engineering "in house"
@PKI: You'' d be surprised where companies a.s e.g. Polk get their stuff..
@PKI: You'' d be surprised where companies a.s e.g. Polk get their stuff..