If you have two identical boxes and you weigh them side by side, the total mass would be less if you had them stacked on top of each other, because the one one top has more potential energy.
We have established charge=energy=mass
The propulsion system that Professor Jim Woodward is working on, is based on the Mach principle using piezo electrics. Therefore the same principle could be exploited using electrostatic speakers.
The extrapolation is the Starship Enterprise could have a Quad ESL 57 drive (maybe a stacked pair).
The propulsion system that Professor Jim Woodward is working on, is based on the Mach principle using piezo electrics. Therefore the same principle could be exploited using electrostatic speakers.
The extrapolation is the Starship Enterprise could have a Quad ESL 57 drive (maybe a stacked pair).
That's what I had gleaned (the latter two anyway).
I thought E=mc^2
I feel I'm failing this class.
Member
Joined 2009
Paid Member
Well
If you think back to the now known reports of Naval pilots in the 40's
Flying around in the fastest propeller driven planes.
Coming in contact with the first German Jets.
The reports are very similar. Unknown and unseen shapes never seen before.
And incredible impossible speeds.
So if you think how amazing drone technology is now. Just for a civilian.
Amazing stabilization , navigation and electronics available at a hobby shop.
Then thinking how fast spy planes were in the 80's
Obviously its more likely that there is some incredible fast spy drones now.
And when you have " increased reports" around Navy fleets or other objects.
That a someone would likely want to have a look at.
Mainly location and heading.
Do you really think they cant make a very very fast drone.
Thinking of power to weight ratio. And very known weird shapes you have seen
already developed to not be radar detectable.
Something small is easier to make incredible fast. Something hard to detect
is going to have a weird shape.
And is very likely has anti capture mechanism. Meaning if captured or pursued fly away fast then ...POOF
self destruct. Easier to do with a non pilot drone.
Its not a huge surprise that UFO or UFA activity is seen all the time.
And likely yes top secret technology or unseen technology. Could sound
outlandish or crazy in a report.
Because yes that is pretty common in the past.
Describing a German Jet to your superior at the time sounds insane and impossible.
Now we dont care if it sounds insane or impossible. If you see it, report it.
No questions or doubts about your sanity.
Eventually over time its realized this is advanced reconnaissance.
And like anything else. If your not smart enough to invent it.
Then you just pay people to capture, steal, copy it.
Or if the technology is stealth. Your looking to get your hands on it.
So you can figure out how to detect it easier.
Human body and brain will shut down and go haywire at intense speeds.
If you eliminate the pilot with a drone. The speed of the object can be increased
and size decreased immensely.
eventually someone will see it. and highly likely early reports wont make sense.
If you think back to the now known reports of Naval pilots in the 40's
Flying around in the fastest propeller driven planes.
Coming in contact with the first German Jets.
The reports are very similar. Unknown and unseen shapes never seen before.
And incredible impossible speeds.
So if you think how amazing drone technology is now. Just for a civilian.
Amazing stabilization , navigation and electronics available at a hobby shop.
Then thinking how fast spy planes were in the 80's
Obviously its more likely that there is some incredible fast spy drones now.
And when you have " increased reports" around Navy fleets or other objects.
That a someone would likely want to have a look at.
Mainly location and heading.
Do you really think they cant make a very very fast drone.
Thinking of power to weight ratio. And very known weird shapes you have seen
already developed to not be radar detectable.
Something small is easier to make incredible fast. Something hard to detect
is going to have a weird shape.
And is very likely has anti capture mechanism. Meaning if captured or pursued fly away fast then ...POOF
self destruct. Easier to do with a non pilot drone.
Its not a huge surprise that UFO or UFA activity is seen all the time.
And likely yes top secret technology or unseen technology. Could sound
outlandish or crazy in a report.
Because yes that is pretty common in the past.
Describing a German Jet to your superior at the time sounds insane and impossible.
Now we dont care if it sounds insane or impossible. If you see it, report it.
No questions or doubts about your sanity.
Eventually over time its realized this is advanced reconnaissance.
And like anything else. If your not smart enough to invent it.
Then you just pay people to capture, steal, copy it.
Or if the technology is stealth. Your looking to get your hands on it.
So you can figure out how to detect it easier.
Human body and brain will shut down and go haywire at intense speeds.
If you eliminate the pilot with a drone. The speed of the object can be increased
and size decreased immensely.
eventually someone will see it. and highly likely early reports wont make sense.
Yes, bad mix of physics and electronics terminology. Plate-charge=energy=mass
Professor Woodward has convinced enough people Mach's principle works, that NASA has awarded him a substantial grant.
Professor Woodward has convinced enough people Mach's principle works, that NASA has awarded him a substantial grant.
What, maybe, seemed outlandish then, was actually the next advancement on most military aircraft technology roadmaps, and already in development in multiple countries. Far more fantastic about UFO reports, compared to those historical emergent technical advances, is that their performance difference isn’t just a leap ahead, or even a radical leap ahead of us. It’s not even 1,000 years down some fantasy technology roadmap either. It’s that they appear capable of performance that simply is physically impossible - as far as we know. Technology eventually advances to meet scientific capability, given enough time. UFO performance, however, is matter of seeming scientific impossibility.
The NASA grant is to fund the trials of a small Mach Effect drive unit which could generate about a hundred millinewtons of force.
We would need a lot of those to power a spaceship, especially if it’s not up in space already.
If this suggested method of propellantless motion is proved viable, its first application may be to adjust the orbits of satellites.
Ultimate EV: This NASA-Funded Space Drive Requires No Fuel
When it comes to jet engines, Frank Whittle deserves a shout out. He was the guy on the British side that independently developed the jet engine. Both he and his German counterpart, Otto Hahn (von Hahn? I can’t remember) became good friends after the war.
I looked it up (as usual!). 😉
You're thinking of German chemist Otto Hahn who is referred to as the father of nuclear chemistry and godfather of nuclear fission.
Still needs power propellant or not. Quite a tether if launched from the ground. 350,000,000 W = 1 Saturn 5
The principle of the jet engine was known way back before the 20th century.
A rudimentary demonstration of jet power dates back to the aeolipile, a device described by Hero of Alexandria in first-century Roman Egypt.
Attachments
Member
Joined 2009
Paid Member
