Aleph J illustrated build guide

Depending on how you have to connect your inductors to the PCBs, I would consider placing them at equal distances both from each other and from signal wiring, while at the same time not having them close to the back panel. The wires will have some ripple on them, and also the inductors can have a magnetic? field affecting circuitry and signal wires etc. also, bridges should be kept close to center of chassis, and equally far away from signal wiring etc.

As for the the runcaps, I would keep those. Think about Mightys layout. Main difference to yours being inductors: how about putting the inductors under the PSU PCBs? Wiring will be short, place will not be an issue. Inductors are easier to place in a P2P PSU, since with a PCB you need the inductors on the sides of the PCB, or you will need to extend their wires.

I am putting my bridges between the transformers, saving space and keeping them far away. Excited to hear what Mighty thinks. I most like the last one you said looked good up there in the earlier post, of the ones posted.

Edit: that is the same one ZM liked best. Go for it!
 
Two further questions:
GND cables from thermistors go tho the same earth screw from VDE?

IMG_20190603_200653-1024x576.jpg

Snubbers on bridges are simple ceramic caps or R+Cs?

IMG_20190524_182403-649x1024.jpg
 
Thanks, o Mighty!

@Andy PCBs are smaller than chokes

improvise

long 3mm spacers, additional metal plate for pcb if needed

etc.

Two further questions:
GND cables from thermistors go tho the same earth screw from VDE?

View attachment 983815

Snubbers on bridges are simple ceramic caps or R+Cs?

View attachment 983816

one screw near IEC is for all chassis connections ......... in your case 3

snubbers - if you have Quasimodo, do it
if you don't have Quasimodo, skip them
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Those snubbers are infact R+C’s, if my eyes serve me right. If you look really close at the yellow shrink, they are a tiny bit thicker on one side. Mightys mighty solder skills at work.

If I were you, I’d go for suggested solution, and extend inductor wires for furthest rails if needed (solder only). If the amp is quiet, be happy. If not, you can consider inductors under PCBs. That will move bridges and the whole PSU a bit further away from the circuit, and possibly enabling you to twist some of the inductor wires together.
 
Very nice, Mightys CRC gone CLC without major layout changes.

I am testing layout right now, details, bridges to be more exact. Long ground planes from machine shop will be made soon, freebies, and that sorta lays the ground for the rest of the layout.

@Mighty: How close is too close between J Zen PCBs and bridges? Ie, would you say Peppeninos bridges are far enough away not to inflict noise in the circuit?

Regards,
Andy
 
I know you have limited twisting OCD, compared to some. Papa does too, ref to FW builds. However his bridges are always put at the back of the chassis. I think I am OK/good either way, but the two pics attached show two alternatives. Practically speaking, one bridge on each side of the tranny, is preferred, if distance to PCB is OK. Distance to first MOSFET measured to approx 7 cm.

The other solution, between trannies, is obviously the quietest, having all the worst ripple carrying wiring in one place as far away from sensitive stuff as possible, approx 20cm. But space is a bit tight.i could easily make it work though, and also there is room to move the trannies further from each other.

Why this challenge? Many, many caps. A proper BJ needs big caps :rofl: So no space for bridges in front of trannies.
 

Attachments

  • F4CFDDF4-EFC2-4A47-9596-90C973FC2245.jpeg
    F4CFDDF4-EFC2-4A47-9596-90C973FC2245.jpeg
    124.1 KB · Views: 274
  • 169FADA3-C6FF-45FC-A7E9-32246F16656C.jpeg
    169FADA3-C6FF-45FC-A7E9-32246F16656C.jpeg
    180.3 KB · Views: 273
move your donuts all the way to front

that way you'll gain few cm, then put bridges in front
you can also mount L brackets for Donuts from underside, there is enough space from base plate to front plate
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20210830_183543.jpg
    IMG_20210830_183543.jpg
    119.9 KB · Views: 269
  • IMG_20210813_195427.jpg
    IMG_20210813_195427.jpg
    121.3 KB · Views: 262
Last edited:
Softstarts behind them is reason why they aren’t all the way against the front… will contemplate… bridges placement is the compromise, or loose 100.000uF 🙁

Perfect solution would be your NTC board between trannies, and suggested mounting from under the bottom plate. You sending? I did order a blank PCB to make NTC board myself. It sid not have cooper in it, so not usable for mye purpose… Greenhorn.

Edit 2: Haha! Funny. That is just the solution I have been making in my head, needing your NTC board since connection block is unwanted. But every time I ask about PSU parts you dodge my question :clown:

Is the problem I never sent you that Viking shield I promised?
 
Last edited:
@BenE123
FWIW I drive a pair of 1028BE with one ACA at times and it works fine for me. Not sure how they compare to the Aria 948 on paper.

The Aleph J would have roughly the same output into 4 ohms as an ACA? Yes?

I’ll be building an Aleph J next…okay not next, but the one after that.


I have 1028 too. Aleph J did not have any problems to drive them very loud in a big room. However, M2X is a better match and way better sounding combo with those loudspeaker.
 
move your donuts all the way to front

that way you'll gain few cm, then put bridges in front
you can also mount L brackets for Donuts from underside, there is enough space from base plate to front plate

Mighty ZM, I see speaker protection circuit, or am I wrong - again? That builder or buyer being sissy, or is it maybe a very good idea? Didn’t use one on my BA-3. then again, if I can get DC on the outputs if, say, a JFET blows, maybe I should consider putting a condom on the outputs. Or will the caps in the circuit rid of it?
 
Last edited: