US Naval pilots "We see UFO everyday for at least a couple of years"

Jump to Latest
#525
nigelwright7557 said:
Even if travel faster than the speed of light was possible what about the danger of hitting even small particles at that speed ? Shields up ?
Click to expand...

I think a person has to think holistically from all the anecdotal evidence, i.e. these vehicles are observed traveling underwater at very rapid rates and transitioning from atmosphere to water with accelerations that would cause any other vehicle to explode upon impact with the water. They are also seen moving though air at hypersonic speeds with no sonic boom. Finally, just the sheer accelerations in all regimes of travel are unheard of for our seemingly feeble technology. It would seem to be consistent that hitting a particle in space at tremendous velocities might not pose a big barrier. I'm speculating of course because how would I know.

One has to conclude that the normal inertial forces resulting from high accelerations have been conquered if much of the observed evidence is real. I think because we haven't been able to do it does not mean that a much older civilization would not be able to do it. I don't think they would even have to be that much older than human civilization. My grandparents were born when there was no internal combustion automobile and the airplane hadn't been invented. That's just two generations. Now information (and misinformation) is disseminated much faster now than ever before.

Finally, one more thing to ponder. Light does not experience an impact when it goes from air to water. Light does not experience a sonic boom when it travels the atmosphere. Photons do not have mass and do not experience inertia. Maybe there's a connection?
 
#529
The PM article describes a prototype test. I'm no physicist, but it appears as though it wasn't so much antigravity as it was using known/understood forces to provide lift. But "antigravity" sounds better.
 
Last edited:
#532
andy2 said:
Well it just so happens we see them when they have their lights on. But doesn't mean they have the lights on all the time. Bottom line nobody really knows.
Click to expand...

And also? Human / Earth convention is for Red / Green.....with on boats a WHITE Masthead light and a few other variations depending on length of craft.

I'v been on planes during nighttime over water flights and I think they just left the white strobe ON.

UFO Lights? Many colors. If they were simply trying to 'blend in'? They'd stick to red / green...
 
#538
To get closer to an answer the military should mount high resolution cameras on their jets, in areas where UFOs are " seen almost daily "
Maybe have some drones circulating those spots, seems their cameras are able to take quality photos
 
Last edited:
#540
@JMFahey,

I dare suspect that even if such crystal clear photos had been published, you would remain in cognitive denial that something bizarrely unusual was going on. The corroborating cumulative evidence: photographic (fuzzy or not), professional eyewitness and radar, spanning 75 years, that the craft are more likely to exist than not, is overwhelming. Which, does not conclude whom is the intelligence behind them.


@amplitude,

I strongly suspect that the military is in possession of much more clear video and photographs, given their reconnaissance capabilities. The Navy videos which were recently released were taken by infrared imaging, which lacks sharp detail and color.


@Bonsai,

Isn't it obvious that IF technology exists such as has been described regarding UFOs, it's likely they have fairly good control over whether they are observed or not? Which suggests that when they are observed, it's because they wish to be, often with bright or flashing light. Screaming, look at me!

Use your own sense of logic. If you wished to introduce yourself to the general population of a unaware, less advanced civilization, without causing panic, would you land your fleet in the center of their capitol, or would you slowly, but increasingly, reveal glimpses of yourself?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom