Ah, now I get it, your brain is wired differently. You won't find my posts intelligible, please put me in your ignore list. I won't ask anymore question on that subject. Don't worry, keep your business.
Last edited:
I seem to recall Mark saying something about being able to do it or knowing someone who could, I'm not sure?
Exactly. At least he's setting the bar low, though. Some of these portable devices really are pathologically bad. Using some $5 device to argue that everything sounds different is disingenuous.
I am not planning to travel to Bogor just to hear a live description of what you are hearing. I already know that from your postings and sorry, I don't buy it. You could tell as well you hear angels singing in high, or I can state I can hear the grass growing in my back yard, it would be as credible.
The numbers are more useful. I will leave the graphs to members like Chris to analyze and determine their significance. As far as how they affect sq, my ears will be the judge. So the arena shrinks to a very small playing field. I'm with you, measurements are meaningless until they correlate with what your ears reveal. Which is quite often a revelation in itself.
He has million dollar worth of equipment. What other reason can explain his persistent effort to block my inquiry? If not him then some cohorts in business with him. He succeeded, I'm no warrior, I don't like dogfights.
Hi indra1,
Hopefully my answer to you is more clear to you and everyone else now. I really don't like to work to hunt down a post I made pages ago in order to correct what someone says I said - but didn't. Maybe in future, you find my post and copy it without editing so everyone has an accurate picture.
-Chris
Actually, that is not what I said. What I said was ...
... and followed that with ...
I am doing my best to answer your question truthfully. But if you are going to attribute something to me, Please take the time to fully understand what I said or ask if you are unsure.
Hopefully my answer to you is more clear to you and everyone else now. I really don't like to work to hunt down a post I made pages ago in order to correct what someone says I said - but didn't. Maybe in future, you find my post and copy it without editing so everyone has an accurate picture.
-Chris
Debating your unsupported claims is not blocking your inquiry, unless you want to make it so. I have no dog in this fight, and if you or anybody else would give up extrapolating their hearing illusions, then there would be no quarrel. At least in the days I'm taking my meds
.My lab was populated in over 20 years, essentially by buying defective "for parts or not working" stuff on EBay and fixing them myself. You are wrong in your evaluation by significantly more than an order of magnitude. Attached is my lab as of end of 2008.
Attachments
Last edited:
Not quite, but I do know how to use what I have.
I'm not blocking anything. I am answering your questions as accurately as I can.
No one is in business with me, there is no gang looking to do you any harm. I do have a problem with things that aren't true being said or pushed onto others.
As an example, the binaural virtual barber shop in youtube (Virtual Barber Shop (Audio...use headphones, close ur eyes) - YouTube) has 36 million views & no one can attach a metric or provide measurement data evidences [I.e. "here is where the sound of the scissors is 1cm from the ear *pointing with a pencil*, here is where the scissors is 10cm away from the ear *pointing with a pencil*"... no one in the world has come forward with any such evidence, so it's 100% subjective / perception]
The holographic effect is just ' blazingly obvious ' & the lack of evidence or the lack of ability to provide evidence actually equates to nothing.
For enjoyment per $ my clip is probably the best audio purchase I have ever made. Never tried hooking to it to my electrostatic headphones but will try one day just to see.
Apologies for misunderstanding Chris, I was not talking about you. I don't even know your equipment sets to make a reasonable comment about it.
About my understanding of what you posted :
Is related to
and
is related to
Did I get it wrong?
Hi,
NwAvGuy is ranty anecdote. 😎😎
He's like... " My SanDisk Clip+ & the NE5532 in my little $15 amplifier are going to conquer the audio world "
I'm surprised the inventors of stuff like LME49990 or AD823 didn't just come up with some idea / method to make him go away.
Funny given the number of audiophile approved albums that have gone through hundreds of 5532 made over the years.
Yes, 0.00003% THD is a more reasonable number. Plus settling time to zero somewhere at 50 nanoseconds to 500 nanoseconds.
In ideal situations with specific equipment.
Not Sony earbuds in traffic.
I will give you proof of my ability to hear 3D once you give a blind man from birth proof of your ability to see the stars.
So you say. But your action tells me otherwise.
Which was continually added and many more you never show. All right have it your way, more than 20 million.
And I am wasting my time. You will not find this post intelligible either.
Attachments
For once, you are right. BTW, you missed the direction of counting the dollars, and the photo is outdated, there is more lately
.- Status
- Not open for further replies.