DIY Sony VFET pt 1

frugal-phile™
Joined 2001
Paid Member
Anyone already working on a tube front end yet?

Something like this?

attachment.php


dave

Nelson, hope it is alright to use your X?
 

Attachments

  • VFET-Evo-X-concept.png
    VFET-Evo-X-concept.png
    11.1 KB · Views: 983
Founder of XSA-Labs
Joined 2012
Paid Member
I think the VFET is a design that already has a “tube like” sound quality already, adding a tube front end is perhaps like a bit too much sweetener in your favorite recipe. Also, making it a BTL (“x” or balanced) output amp will cancel out even order distortion and make it more odd-order dominant distortion. If that’s the sound one likes, I guess it’s fine.
 

6L6

Moderator
Joined 2010
Paid Member
However, will not placing such a large electrolytic capacitor in the output signal path negatively offset some linearity this transistor is known for? Again, I'm assuming this is to keep costs down, as designing a push pull class A version using these devices would easily triple the cost.

Not looking to start a debate, Just wanting to get some feedback from the group regarding this.


The short answer is “because the amp uses a single-rail power supply.”

It doesn’t affect the linearity of the Vfet at all.

This is great information -

SYclotron Audio | Why are people obsessed with coupling caps?
 
frugal-phile™
Joined 2001
Paid Member
I think the VFET is a design that already has a “tube like” sound quality already

I hate the term "tube-like". I take it to mean a badly designed tube circuit. A good triode is one of the most linear amplification devices we have. A well designed stage should be very neutral, have lots of swing, and high DDR.

No "tube-like" please.

dave
 
Founder of XSA-Labs
Joined 2012
Paid Member
In my mind, “tube like” means dominant second harmonic, a bit of third, not much else and THD around 1%. I think the VFET amp is sort of described by this. So adding a SET tube front end will just be adding more THD and more H2 and H3 and it may be laying it on a bit too much.

I don’t hear anyone else referring to “DDR” of a tube amp. If you mean resolving detail and having low distortion, a state of the art solid state opamp like OPA1656 will be tough to beat.

There is the nano vacuum channel transistor (NVCT) (a filament-less SET that is like a vacuum tube but operates by having electrons fly across a 40nm gap (smaller than mean free path) so that even ambient pressure is considered a “vacuum”). The NVCT can operate up to 400GHz so is very high speed. Unfortunately, still researchy “one of a kind” prototypes.

Nanoscale vacuum channel transistors fabricated on silicon carbide wafers | Nature Electronics
 
Last edited:
Official Court Jester
Joined 2003
Paid Member
I hate the term "tube-like". I take it to mean a badly designed tube circuit. A good triode is one of the most linear amplification devices we have. A well designed stage should be very neutral, have lots of swing, and high DDR.

No "tube-like" please.

dave

agree 100%

OK, it is not outrageosly linear ...... I mean - with care it is

point is - when I'm content with tube stage I made, nobody could tell is it tube or something else, if not being able to peek under the lid
 
Official Court Jester
Joined 2003
Paid Member
....

After 10 days of digesting I got to admit defeat. My understanding is that a P-channel common drain square law device loaded with a current source should have a negative phase H2, but Papa said in diy_part_1 the J28 was doing positive. :confused:

see- that's why I'm not even bothering with phase

as Homer would say, after head is starting to ache - "hm....... Beer!"

:clown:
 
Member
Joined 2004
Paid Member
Folks:

A dumb question, perhaps, but how much capacitance would you recommend for a linear power supply for this VFET amp? I am contemplating a CLC or CLCRC supply and was imagining something on the order of 100,000 uF, but I have no experience with VFETs and limited experience with low-powered amps.

Thanks for the input!

Regards,
Scott