I'm not sure why tin plating is an advantage for signals below 20 kHz w/r to skin effect. Corrosion, absolutely.
Jn
Jn
Reducing corrosion is reducing the skin effect. Surface charge density increases with frequency and decreases with surface area (actually, volume). Go for multi-strand, thick, soft, homogenous copper wire.
Skin effect in audio is laughable;
Anti skin is a step beyond.
A major break through from Ukrainian experts.
Thanks, keep going, there is no end to it.
Anti skin is a step beyond.
A major break through from Ukrainian experts.
Thanks, keep going, there is no end to it.
A 1mm diameter wire will have skin effect at 10khz. The resistance impact will be roughly 100 milliohm increase per 1000 feet.
The inductive impact will be a reduction of internal inductance to the tune of 2 to 5 nanohenries per foot.
Neither is very significant, and I suspect I could not measure it with current SOTA.
Skin effect is the redistribution of current density (not charge density) as a consequence of the conductivity of the metal and time rate of change of magnetic field trying to penetrate the metal. Eddy currents sum with the transport current to redistribute the effective current density.
It's just the current trying to follow the path of least impedance, nothing more, nothing less.
Jn
The inductive impact will be a reduction of internal inductance to the tune of 2 to 5 nanohenries per foot.
Neither is very significant, and I suspect I could not measure it with current SOTA.
Skin effect is the redistribution of current density (not charge density) as a consequence of the conductivity of the metal and time rate of change of magnetic field trying to penetrate the metal. Eddy currents sum with the transport current to redistribute the effective current density.
It's just the current trying to follow the path of least impedance, nothing more, nothing less.
Jn
Darn, Have just too much ethics is seems. Could make a killing selling snake oil to those who want so badly to believe. Guess I could start selling slightly used bridges...
Skin effect is the redistribution of current density (not charge density)
What is the difference?
Wrong even at 50 Hz power transmission it is common to use 3 or 4 conductors spaced to make maximum use of the metal
Avoiding "skin effect" in high power voltage transmission | Huggins Photography
Unlikely to be a problem with HiFi though.
So a picture of a power line shows skin effect?
??? Did you just make that up? Ever heard of 3 phase power lines? 1 phase per wire sometimes plus ground?
Edit...sigh, looked at the link.
Some things ya can't unsee.
You can't hide IT follows you. There's no skin effect at audio frequencies, RG58 is not a transmission line at audio frequencies, it just keeps on going.
jneutron,
charge density refers to ionic charge, in common parlance: current. Ionic charge is not at all uniformly distributed within the conductor and it moves more easily in the surface layers.
It seems to me that you have not pondered this matter thoroughly enough and have long way to go.
charge density refers to ionic charge, in common parlance: current. Ionic charge is not at all uniformly distributed within the conductor and it moves more easily in the surface layers.
It seems to me that you have not pondered this matter thoroughly enough and have long way to go.
Scott,
I know. Saw somebody over at ASR say you can't parallel multiple coax to reduce the effective impedance. Sigh, just not worth engaging. What did someone say.... ankle biters.
I remember when I first entered the world of Internet forums... I really thought knowledge would progress fast, and that everybody would participate to grow what is known and learn what is unknown.
That was when I was young, stupid, and naive. I'm much older now.
Probably should tell the pulsed magnet guys that what they did cannot work, so might as well pull the multiple paralleled cables out..
Trying to design up a test to measure midband speaker impedance during low frequency excursion. The complexity of the problem is exhilarating. When I figure it out, have no idea who to collaborate with.
Jn
I know. Saw somebody over at ASR say you can't parallel multiple coax to reduce the effective impedance. Sigh, just not worth engaging. What did someone say.... ankle biters.
I remember when I first entered the world of Internet forums... I really thought knowledge would progress fast, and that everybody would participate to grow what is known and learn what is unknown.
That was when I was young, stupid, and naive. I'm much older now.
Probably should tell the pulsed magnet guys that what they did cannot work, so might as well pull the multiple paralleled cables out..
Trying to design up a test to measure midband speaker impedance during low frequency excursion. The complexity of the problem is exhilarating. When I figure it out, have no idea who to collaborate with.
Jn
Last edited:
jneutron,
charge density refers to ionic charge, in common parlance: current. Ionic charge is not at all uniformly distributed within the conductor and it moves more easily in the surface layers.
It seems to me that you have not pondered this matter thoroughly enough and have long way to go.
I assume you can provide some textbook references?
And yah, I rarely ponder this electrical stuff, I'm surprised my employer continues to pay me.
Jn
Last edited:
It seems to me that you have not pondered this matter thoroughly enough and have long way to go.
That is one in the list for quote of the year.
I am occasionally reminded of KBK's poetry. The noise spectrum of a spool of wire is something I have never done, it might be interesting.
So a picture of a power line shows skin effect?...
No, read the caption. Note the three wires in this one "conductor" help avoid the limits of skin effect. (in one of the three phases)
It is really big "Litz" (in the US sense), without the braid. You get more skin for the same amount of metal.
People who do math may object that the increased heat dissipation is the more compelling reason for three wires per phase. Or that a district load grew over decades and it was better use of capital to install one wire in 1980, a second in 2003, and a third in 2016. (My street is wired 2/3 wYe, just waiting for the demand boom they expected in 1983.)
Saw somebody over at ASR say you can't parallel multiple coax to reduce the effective impedance. Sigh, just not worth engaging.
Nothing to show but more closed cable threads.
As indra1 said...
It's not skinning, it is voltage gradient in the surrounding air. With a megavolt conductor, say #12 AWG, the voltage gradient in the air next to the conductor is high enough to ionize the air. By going to larger diameter, the gradient is reduced.
The pic is an example of using multiple conductors to reduce the air gradient.
It has nothing to do with skin effect.
Jn
It's not skinning, it is voltage gradient in the surrounding air. With a megavolt conductor, say #12 AWG, the voltage gradient in the air next to the conductor is high enough to ionize the air. By going to larger diameter, the gradient is reduced.
The pic is an example of using multiple conductors to reduce the air gradient.
It has nothing to do with skin effect.
Jn
It seems to me that you have not pondered this matter thoroughly enough and have long way to go🙄jneutron,
charge density refers to ionic charge, in common parlance: current. Ionic charge is not at all uniformly distributed within the conductor and it moves more easily in the surface layers.
It seems to me that you have not pondered this matter thoroughly enough and have long way to go.
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
- Home
- Design & Build
- Parts
- Skin Effect in Wires.