Right like Bybees, cable direction and shatki stones. And dont forget anything quantum. If you suggested anything plausible maybe we wouldnt resist so much. But taking the word of a pompous *** whoose only proof is 30 year old anecdotes and his seventy year old ears, and not even blind, is the real fools errand.
You are outdated, you missed the latest Geoff Kait product:
New Dark Matter NDM, the newest product from Machina Dynamica, is the only audio product that absorbs both visible scattered laser light and invisible scattered light in CD players, thereby improving optical signal to noise ratio, thus improving sound quality.
New Dark Matter NDM, the newest product from Machina Dynamica, is the only audio product that absorbs both visible scattered laser light and invisible scattered light in CD players, thereby improving optical signal to noise ratio, thus improving sound quality.
You obviously did not read the whole product technical description.
Machina Dynamica Web Site
My absolute favorite is the TELEPORTATION TWEAK LONG DISTANCE SYSTEM UPGRADE in which Geoff makes you call him long distance and, for a fee, he fixes your system sound over the phone.
Machina Dynamica Web Site
My absolute favorite is the TELEPORTATION TWEAK LONG DISTANCE SYSTEM UPGRADE in which Geoff makes you call him long distance and, for a fee, he fixes your system sound over the phone.
Last edited:
I need time to catch up with these things 
For new how about this Analog Corner #297: van den Hul The Grail SE+ phono preamplifier & SAEC WE-4700 tonearm | Stereophile.com
How you can add $21k onto the same basic circuit is a miracle of marketing. I also smile at the error in the description marked in bold.
For new how about this Analog Corner #297: van den Hul The Grail SE+ phono preamplifier & SAEC WE-4700 tonearm | Stereophile.com
How you can add $21k onto the same basic circuit is a miracle of marketing. I also smile at the error in the description marked in bold.
You're not really high end unless you use inductors rather than capacitors. Where are the equivalent articles to Bateman, etc. outlining the less than ideal behaviors of inductors? Folklore is the force i.e. the high end has become more hopeless than ever, inductors have more non-idealities, distortion, etc. than capacitors ever could have.
Last edited:
In which case I shall remain proud of my mid-fi efforts
Edit: I also get kicks from looking at how $20 worth of bits (or free if you have a good junk box) a focusrite scarlet and a laptop/miniDSP could give you close to state of the art vinyl performance and annoy lots of people at the same time.
Edit: I also get kicks from looking at how $20 worth of bits (or free if you have a good junk box) a focusrite scarlet and a laptop/miniDSP could give you close to state of the art vinyl performance and annoy lots of people at the same time.
Last edited:
Yes, I recall a distinguished High End Audio designer on this forum, using inductors in a RIAA correction circuit.
Who cares about caps vs inductors for RIAA EQ? Both could work well in principle.
For the record, I have not talked to Geoff Kait in many years perhaps a decade, but I once did defend his 'products' for a few years on 'Audio Asylum' but I am not sure if that was not a mistake. I just could not get enough explanation from him as to why each 'tweak' worked, so I fell away from defending him.
For the record, I have not talked to Geoff Kait in many years perhaps a decade, but I once did defend his 'products' for a few years on 'Audio Asylum' but I am not sure if that was not a mistake. I just could not get enough explanation from him as to why each 'tweak' worked, so I fell away from defending him.
Notwithstanding Mr. Bybee who gave you all the explanations you need to understand the devices operation, enough to defend and support him, correct?