Again, selective quoting.
Guilty as charged, here it is verbatim and put in the correct context. The context is the whole signal chain, including transducers.
"The electronics are completely transparent, with some exceptions".
Last edited:
You can't prove a negative.Absent by the looks of it.
Guilty as charged, here it is verbatim and put it in the correct context. The context is the whole signal chain, including transducers.
"The electronics are completely transparent, with some exceptions".
I hope you are including the room, ears and brain in "transducers"
I'm not interested in proof, since we're not doing math here, rather science.
Science me wrong then.
What I include as 'transducers' isn't relevant, its a copy/paste from post #157
So you use a word and then say it isn't relevant what you mean?
No, post 162 I suspect is almost all copy and paste
So you use a word and then say it isn't relevant what you mean?
No.
No, post 162 I suspect is almost all copy and paste
Looks to me you've created a false dichotomy. Was that your conscious intent?
What do all these people have to say about getting good sound?
Didn't you just give a summary (post #157, bullet point #1)? Which wasn't supported with evidence? So we've come around in a circle.
Didn't you just give a summary (post #157, bullet point #1)? Which wasn't supported with evidence? So we've come around in a circle.
Do you really think there's no evidence for my statements?
Maybe you should actually read those scientific papers, there's plenty of evidence, you just ignore it. Again I don't have to provide evidence that most audio electronics is transparent or accurate. I don't have to go to Mars to provide evidence that there's no life, others have to go to Mars to provide evidence for life.
YOU have to get of your feet and provide evidence.
An example:Can you tell me what FUD means please?
Cheers!
That satire gave me a good chuckle.
dave
Do you really think there's no evidence for my statements?
What I think isn't relevant, that would just be an opinion. Everyone's got one.
Maybe you should actually read those scientific papers, there's plenty of evidence, you just ignore it. Again I don't have to provide evidence that most audio electronics is transparent or accurate. I don't have to go to Mars to provide evidence that there's no life, others have to go to Mars to provide evidence for life.
YOU have to get of your feet and provide evidence.
More of the narrative.
For me the man did not set foot on the Moon, because the radiation from Van Alley's belt kills any living being that wants to go through it. Is this cut and paste? Is it not a statement based on science? Is it necessary to be Einstein to affirm this?
Here it has been said that they have developed the best amplifiers of the plant with Ltspice and did not attach a miser circuit, I have contributed two excellent articles with their respective links and instead of commenting on it, they are childishly dedicated to provoking each other. FUD? Go fangulo!
Here it has been said that they have developed the best amplifiers of the plant with Ltspice and did not attach a miser circuit, I have contributed two excellent articles with their respective links and instead of commenting on it, they are childishly dedicated to provoking each other. FUD? Go fangulo!
It's just the rules of critical thinking.More of the narrative.
Bitchy isn't it.
- Status
- This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.
- Home
- Member Areas
- The Lounge
- I think I've condensed in only 4 Laws the guideline for the best-in-class audio chain