Given the revival of this driver, I was cleaning up some old designs and did this planset up.
http://www.planet10-hifi.com/downloads/SDX10-woofPlans-240418.pdf
QC appreciated.
dave
http://www.planet10-hifi.com/downloads/SDX10-woofPlans-240418.pdf
QC appreciated.
dave
Thanx for the QC.
The document is as much a tutorial with some explicient example boxes. Could be modified/scaled for any driver that is happy in a sealed box. ie one could replace 1 SDX10 with 2 SDX7, or SDX12 (althou i prefer the 10”). With changes only to driver cut-outs, rebates and holes-brace required.
dave
The document is as much a tutorial with some explicient example boxes. Could be modified/scaled for any driver that is happy in a sealed box. ie one could replace 1 SDX10 with 2 SDX7, or SDX12 (althou i prefer the 10”). With changes only to driver cut-outs, rebates and holes-brace required.
dave
A close-miked measurement is normally pretty smooth. That almost looks like a measurement taken 6 inches or more away from the cone.
I’m looking at this old thread with a few questions, what do you gain by building the large dual woofer version vs. the smaller dual woofer version? If you only had two drivers would you build two subs or go with a single dual opposed? Assume full range speakers with good bass output.
Thanks,
Robert
Thanks,
Robert
That is a good question and a hard one. Push-push provides a dramatic reduction in box load, 2 woofers allow for smoother room response.
I put in a pair of push-push woofers to solve that conundrum. Works really well.
dave
I put in a pair of push-push woofers to solve that conundrum. Works really well.
dave
Maybe a bit late, but I found out the hard way that the size for the 2 top/bottom panels in the "Sealed Cube SDX10" saw-plan on the 4th page is incorrect.
Stated size is 335x317 but should be 353x317.