What do you refer to as "critical" distance for mid and high frequencies ?
The critical distance is the distance from the source at which the direct sound and the reverberation are equal in level.
I found the nasties of the JX92 hard to listen too at any distance.
dave
No fullranger will be "enabled" for nearfield...i explained the reason why in my previos post. It's hopeless, nearfield sucks whatever the drivers...
The critical distance is the distance from the source at which the direct sound and the reverberation are equal in level.
Is there a way to calculate or measure it ?
Thanks Graaf.
What distance calculator spat out actually matches a lot with what i've come to empirically.
What distance calculator spat out actually matches a lot with what i've come to empirically.
Well... After all, if it is called "critical" distance, it will have to be so...😛
The only critical thing about my hobby is if i bring the bottle with brandy close to my listening seat. Then i don't have to get up - now that's really critical 🙂
Last edited:
Room treatment for gigantic suckers in gigantic rooms and that is money well spent.
And Cardas speaker placement ofc
And Cardas speaker placement ofc
When is the critical distance not THE critical distance? 😕🙁
At home sweet home? Almost ever...😉
The 60º equilateral triangle is what really rules, imho... The rest a simple consequence of distance from speaker to speaker. Might be half a meter on a dsktop home studio, might be over 3m in a large living room...Even heard guys praising the virtues of nearfield monitors in the middle of a large living room/loft...

Last edited:
Member
Joined 2009
Paid Member
I think there's a difference between adding good sound to a family living environment (how else do we encourage young people to upgrade from ear buds) and trying to create a living environment in a sound studio. To look at some of the photographs of various hi-end set-ups the latter is more in play. When you can control all the factors in creating such a space of course you can go crazy with big horns or whatever. In my view, the challenge is the former, the creation of good quality spacious sound within a constrained living environment. It's the harder path to travel, but has much more potential to advance the art and reputation of hi-end audio before it withers further on the vine of modern convenience. It has to work with the room, reflections and diffractions. It has to work near-field/medium-field because that's the reality for most living spaces. It's a worthy challenge. It has to be answered with small speakers. To work well in near field you can't have different drivers spread out such that it takes too far of a listening distance for the sound to integrate as a whole. Big multi-way towers are fine for the man-cave/HT but not for the average listening - living space. Small speakers are needed. Diffraction (I'm trying to get back on topic....) becomes relevant with small speakers.
Last edited:
Maybe not as big a challenge as you might think in the normal living room since a bit of everything re reflective surfaces, absorption, scattering etc is a good thing and easily achieved with all the furniture and clutter of modern life
I think the challenge is understanding why most domestic rooms are friendly sounding enough, except maybe when the source is a (pair of...) loudspeaker(s).
That's why you need to get up to date and hear an Eikona 😉
I’d love too… it is all about priorities given limited cash flow.
dave
- Home
- Loudspeakers
- Multi-Way
- What are some good example of baffle design to improve diffraction