I imported all the files into Logic on individual channels so I could quickly switch between amps and loop certain segments of the song. Funny, they all sound better than the original "control" file to me. I listened with two pairs of headphones but did not get to fire up the speakers since wife and baby are sleeping. I did hear significant differences in the vocals between tracks in terms of transparency, timbre, distortion, and forwardness. I felt there were differences in bass as well, but I didn't pay much attention to that since my headphones don't reproduce bass that well, and I tend to always be drawn to the realism of vocals for judging sound quality anyway. I hope I didn't vote for the darn Fiio...😱
I am watching this poll with great interest. Interesting to me is that some folks struggle to hear a difference, and others can clearly distinguish differences. I am still busy comparing and am not in a hurry to vote.
To match the clips with the listed amps would be like playing the Lotto to me.
Just a question - what does it mean if you find the reference track the best sounding, or worst the sounding (like someone else observed)? Is that an indication the you need to build one of X's headamps? 🙂
To match the clips with the listed amps would be like playing the Lotto to me.
The FiiO gets rave reviews among the head-fi folks, so yes, it would be very interesting to see the final rankings.I hope I didn't vote for the darn Fiio...😱
Just a question - what does it mean if you find the reference track the best sounding, or worst the sounding (like someone else observed)? Is that an indication the you need to build one of X's headamps? 🙂
O2
And Oh, it would have been very interesting to see a O2 in the mix. It still seems to have a cult following.
And Oh, it would have been very interesting to see a O2 in the mix. It still seems to have a cult following.
And Oh, it would have been very interesting to see a O2 in the mix. It still seems to have a cult following.
For almost all intents and purposes, Agdr's Super CMOY 1688 is like an O2 but perhaps even better.
Just a question - what does it mean if you find the reference track the best sounding, or worst the sounding (like someone else observed)? Is that an indication the you need to build one of X's headamps? 🙂
I did some more listening today over my near-field speaker setup. Interesting to me is the fact that the vocals sound a little overdriven in the reference track, which makes it hard to compare the samples for realism. Not sure if the singer was mic'ed too close, preamp saturation, compression artifacts, or what. But it makes it a bit hard to judge the headphone amps sounds, since the recording isn't very transparent to begin with.
Yeah, I can see that there is plenty of headroom in the file. I mean that they recorded her voice with that saturation, perhaps intentionally.
xrk - I note from your first post that you recorded these tracks using a 270 Ohm resistive load meant to simulate your DT880-250 headphones. The problem is, as John Siau of Benchmark has shown in several papers, there are big, and potentially audible, differences between how a headphone amplifier deals with a purely resistive load and a reactive load like headphone drivers, especially for amplifier output impedances which are not near-zero Ohms.
What are your thoughts on these effects on the validity of your poll results?
What are your thoughts on these effects on the validity of your poll results?
Last edited:
Bisson's Sept in Montreal has been very highly touted as perhaps the best recorded HiFi track for quality of sound and mastering.
That album has been reissued in master-quality reel to reel for $600 even.
Anne Bisson: Blue Mind An Audiophile Favorite is Given a Makeover - Positive Feedback
High resolution USB driver version is $30.
Jazz singer Anne Bisson's discography: Blue Mind - Portraits & Perfumes
That album has been reissued in master-quality reel to reel for $600 even.
Anne Bisson: Blue Mind An Audiophile Favorite is Given a Makeover - Positive Feedback
High resolution USB driver version is $30.
Jazz singer Anne Bisson's discography: Blue Mind - Portraits & Perfumes
xrk - I note from your first post that you recorded these tracks using a 270 Ohm resistive load meant to simulate your DT880-250 headphones. The problem is, as John Siau of Benchmark has shown in several papers, there are big, and potentially audible, differences between how an amplifier deals with a purely resistive load and a reactive load like headphone drivers, especially for amplifier output impedances which are not near-zero Ohms
What are your thoughts on these effects on the validity of your poll results?
Good point. However, having a fixed resistive load is the only neutral way to represent the amps without adding the bias of an inductive load. However. all of these amps have low impedance drive capability and can probably handle 16ohm loads even. So while not a perfect test, gives us a much better understanding of how this amp tends to sound if you had a perfectly resistive load headphone. A headphone with an AMT pleated membrane would actually be purely resistive. I would not say it invalidates the poll because the poll tests the effect of the amp on a resistive load and some amps are better than others even from that aspect.
Gopher,
Simulation is an attempt to control the environment for reasons of comparison. You are right; reactive effects are always ever present, particularly with speakers which their mechanical and crossover effects. ES headphones are the big one since they have huge capacitance, which badly affect the global feedback amplifiers.
XRK's HPA is a pure Class A single ended design. Such topologies have the least issues with reactive loads. Not to say its insignificance, but X's design is one of the very best in this problem area.
HD
Simulation is an attempt to control the environment for reasons of comparison. You are right; reactive effects are always ever present, particularly with speakers which their mechanical and crossover effects. ES headphones are the big one since they have huge capacitance, which badly affect the global feedback amplifiers.
XRK's HPA is a pure Class A single ended design. Such topologies have the least issues with reactive loads. Not to say its insignificance, but X's design is one of the very best in this problem area.
HD
I have to say, single ended class A with zero global feedback has a superior sound. I have built a lot of amps and these are among the best. It's very obvious to me when listening versus an opamp based one.
XRK's HPA is a pure Class A single ended design. Such topologies have the least issues with reactive loads. Not to say its insignificance, but X's design is one of the very best in this problem area.
Which one is XRK's HPA in post 1?
Which one is XRK's HPA in post 1?
No 2 - the Pocket Class A Headamp.
http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/group-buys/302859-xrk971-pocket-class-headamp-gb.html
In my experiments for a blind listening tests, levels need to be matched to 0.1dB or better, otherwise the listeners tend to pick the loudest signal.
I also found MP3 compression even at quite low compression ratios affects the stereo image accuracy and can cause interpritation of transients to be altered.
Tests also found listeners tend to prefer increased even order distortion, increased trebble and bass and increased crosstalk. So are you looking for the most accurate sound or the most euphonic.
Regards,
Andrew
I also found MP3 compression even at quite low compression ratios affects the stereo image accuracy and can cause interpritation of transients to be altered.
Tests also found listeners tend to prefer increased even order distortion, increased trebble and bass and increased crosstalk. So are you looking for the most accurate sound or the most euphonic.
Regards,
Andrew
In my experiments for a blind listening tests, levels need to be matched to 0.1dB or better, otherwise the listeners tend to pick the loudest signal.
I also found MP3 compression even at quite low compression ratios affects the stereo image accuracy and can cause interpritation of transients to be altered.
Tests also found listeners tend to prefer increased even order distortion, increased trebble and bass and increased crosstalk. So are you looking for the most accurate sound or the most euphonic.
Regards,
Andrew
The poll question is what presentation do you like best?
The polarity of some of the files is inverted.
This might be possible if I mis-wired one of the amp headphone jacks. Both left and right would have to be mis-wires though, or the amp naturally acts as an inverted follower?
The poll question is what presentation do you like best?
So you will most likely end up with the prefered option being the loudest.
Regards,
Andrew
It would seem A, F and G are inverting amplifiers, since both channels were inverted in the files.
Also RMS levels are spread over 0.5dB...
Also RMS levels are spread over 0.5dB...
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
- Home
- Amplifiers
- Headphone Systems
- Blind Virtual Audition of Several Headamps