CFH7 Amp

I agree, the waves look good. I will try to get it hooked up to my A/B setup in the next day or two. I want to hook it up to a smaller PSU so I can let it play for a while. Right now it is being fed by my variac through a big PSU.

BTW, I used BC546C/556C. The amp is very quiet. It does have a nasty turn on thump. Likely because of all the large caps that have to charge. A speaker protection with delayed on will take care of it.

Turn on thump is usually related to an asymmetry in the caps and how they are charged on a differential input amp. As this is not differential input - I wonder if it is simply the slow RC time constant of the 15k resistor and 2200uF input stage supply?
 
I got a chance to put it on My A/B setup. Virtually indistinguishable from the VSSA, which of course is a compliment. Big sound stage, clear highs and tight deep bass. Very nice. I didn't try it with a poor PSU so I can't tell if all the extra caps are doing anything. I suspect they might help if using an SMPS, though some SMPS would have trouble charging those big caps.

Anyway, nice little amp.
 
Show me the data where you see the built in diodes in verticals.

You are ruled by discount. When you factor in the added complexity of using verticals as well as the additional parts required and the need to attach the VBE to the heatsink there is little savings. Then factor in the total cost of building a completed amp with PSU, speaker protection, heatsinks and case. A couple of dollars for superior outputs means very little.
 
Show me the data where you see the built in diodes in verticals.

You are ruled by discount. When you factor in the added complexity of using verticals as well as the additional parts required and the need to attach the VBE to the heatsink there is little savings. Then factor in the total cost of building a completed amp with PSU, speaker protection, heatsinks and case. A couple of dollars for superior outputs means very little.

Unless I am misreading the diagram of the MOSFET, there appears to be a protection diode in place:

http://www.vishay.com/docs/91210/91210.pdf

A BD139 Vbe multiplier and two resistors costs about $0.20 (or less). I agree the PCB is a bit more complicated - but there's no difference in price to make it so.

A lateral FET costs about $5ea from a trusted US source. The IRFP is about $2 from Digikey. About a $6 savings for two per amp.

Not much in the scheme of things like $60 PSU and a $300 case. But with that comparison - not much matters from amp to amp - even ones that use dual die Alfets.

For DIYers who have a single PSU and make lots of different amps to try an play - the cost is a small factor. Mostly from the quest for bang for the buck. Even you like the fact that you can make a PCB for $1 and derive some satisfaction from it. I admit it, I love good amp deals and low cost amps that sounds good.

Even at $5ea - I have about 5 sets of lateral FETs myself. Some I even paid $12ea. Now that's a big difference compared to $1 hexFET.

I don't want to argue if one is better than the other. The laterals have their place and their fans. I guess I just like the verticals because, as you say, I am driven by good deals.
 
Last edited:
I think both are good, actually, though I prefer the hexfets because they have:

1. Much higher transconductance (gm) which means the OPS has higher linearity, that is, throughput is close to 1.
2. With traction and smps technologies, the big companies have put a lot of work into hexfets and they offer up to 5Kw dissipation and that wonderful cap drive system, the gate, which can be driven with almost no drive at all. It also means you can build a 500W amp with 1Kw devices which never break down under SOAR issues that kill bipolars.
3. Very good thermal characteristics that permit huge reserves of power.
4. Very low Rdson, down to a few milliohms, excellent for driving difficult speakers.
5. VERY CHEAP!!

The laterals are good too, but their gm is poor, their Rdson is high, their biggest is only a double die that is rated to 250W only. OTOH, they have a 'soft' sound, a bit tubey, and they are very easy to compensation thermally, essentially, they don't need any! And unfortunately they are expensive......

Hugh
 
You guys might be talking about diodes in two different places.
All MOSFETs have an intrinsic diode from drain to source.
The laterals (at least the Hitachi/Renesas version) also includes back to back zeners from gate to source - a nice feature that helps make them "tough".
See the old datasheet snip.

mlloyd1

Show me the data where you see the built in diodes in verticals.

You are ruled by discount. When you factor in the added complexity of using verticals as well as the additional parts required and the need to attach the VBE to the heatsink there is little savings. Then factor in the total cost of building a completed amp with PSU, speaker protection, heatsinks and case. A couple of dollars for superior outputs means very little.
 

Attachments

  • laterals.PNG
    laterals.PNG
    49.3 KB · Views: 533
Last edited:
X, congratulations with a cool little amp! :cheers:
Terry did a great testing job, as he always does :worship:

Right, HexFETs have got no gate-to-source Zeners embedded. However, in EF + source follower arrangement, it's difficult to imagine a situation, where the sources don't follow the gates, damaging the FETs (unless one of the drivers shorts, but in this case Zener will not help either). I often use no Zeners in this kind of arrangement - never had any issues.
 
Thanks Valery! 🙂

I am looking forward to building my own as soon as the PCB arrives. Terry did a great job testing and debugging. Andrewlebon was very good with catching the error on the Vbe multiplier layout. AndewT helped with some excellent suggestions on improving layout. Both Idefixes and Sonal did a great job on the layouts. Very eye catching - and effective designs. It's neat to see how quickly an idea can become reality with group think.
 
I think both are good, actually, though I prefer the hexfets because they have:

1. Much higher transconductance (gm) which means the OPS has higher linearity, that is, throughput is close to 1.
2. With traction and smps technologies, the big companies have put a lot of work into hexfets and they offer up to 5Kw dissipation and that wonderful cap drive system, the gate, which can be driven with almost no drive at all. It also means you can build a 500W amp with 1Kw devices which never break down under SOAR issues that kill bipolars.
3. Very good thermal characteristics that permit huge reserves of power.
4. Very low Rdson, down to a few milliohms, excellent for driving difficult speakers.
5. VERY CHEAP!!

The laterals are good too, but their gm is poor, their Rdson is high, their biggest is only a double die that is rated to 250W only. OTOH, they have a 'soft' sound, a bit tubey, and they are very easy to compensation thermally, essentially, they don't need any! And unfortunately they are expensive......

Hugh

Hugh, I agree with everything above - just one more thing, we normally have to consider throughout the design process - input capacitance.

Laterals have got lower Ciss, plus it does not really depend on Vds, allowing simple direct drive from the VAS stage with no issues.

HexFETs' higher Ciss pretty much depends on Vds, so I always tend to drive them with some sort of EF driver stage with low output impedance.
So, this is not really an issue - it's just a specialty, we have to take care of.
All the other properties make the HexFETs (and the newer TrenchFETs) excellent output devices.