Net, so + the panel thicknesses. Of course you can shrink them, but then so goes the low bass, though if there's some decent room/ gain, then it will make it up. At a glance, ~110 L/3.885 ft^3 net is about as low as practical.
GM
GM
I updated the program and it works now without having to delete 'masked' and/or damping in the Wizard,
Hi GM,
Just to clarify - absorbent filling material specified in the Loudspeaker Wizard is taken into account in the wizard results only. Sound pressure and particle velocity results are calculated external to the wizard, and do not include the effect of any wizard-specified absorbent filling material.
Kind regards,
David
Greets!
Understood and why it's of no use to me AFAIK since I've no measured data to maybe develop a ratio chart, so at a glance curious what it is useful for, or did you include it just because you could?
GM
Understood and why it's of no use to me AFAIK since I've no measured data to maybe develop a ratio chart, so at a glance curious what it is useful for, or did you include it just because you could?
GM
Understood and why it's of no use to me AFAIK since I've no measured data to maybe develop a ratio chart, so at a glance curious what it is useful for, or did you include it just because you could?
Hi GM,
The sound pressure and particle velocity charts were included because somebody asked for them 🙂.
From memory, I think the user wanted to check the levels generated in the port of a bass-reflex speaker under high power conditions.
Kind regards,
David
- Status
- Not open for further replies.