DBT only seems to be disregarded by audiophiles who are so convinced by their infallible hearing that they don't want to take part because they may be shown to be wrong...
I have also noticed on here and other threads that when presented with facts, measurement's or even the laws of physics, these are also wrong, incorrect, not applicable to esoteric audio design and name calling and tantrums do seem to creep in.
I have also noticed on here and other threads that when presented with facts, measurement's or even the laws of physics, these are also wrong, incorrect, not applicable to esoteric audio design and name calling and tantrums do seem to creep in.
But if you put forward arguments that the average 12 year old can drive a bus through what do you expect?
... of what?
Watching Fish Called Wanda, seen it twice. That makes me a survivor? 😀
My German is adequate but not superb, and I am able to walk well and speak unaided, so right off the bat, no.
My professional field is polymers and analytical chemistry, not cosmology. If the latter is your interest, guys like Chris Pope will be a better resource for you. I have a decent non-specialist knowledge, but not the sort of depth that someone who really works in that field will have.
Here you go, Joe. Probably not a good idea to discuss this here but you should find it interesting.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=19q1i-wAUpY
Most published scientific articles are Drivel.
Scientists have to publish, but prefer to spend their time on one thing, so the rest turns Dribble.
Scientific articles are mostly read by those who themselves produce Drizzle.
The ones who have a problem with that, are either individuals who never had to read scientific publications, or the scientists who didn't Cash-In before Boot-Out.
Move on !
Scientists have to publish, but prefer to spend their time on one thing, so the rest turns Dribble.
Scientific articles are mostly read by those who themselves produce Drizzle.
The ones who have a problem with that, are either individuals who never had to read scientific publications, or the scientists who didn't Cash-In before Boot-Out.
Move on !
A bunch of empty boxes, duh. 😀
FEI makes really really *really* nice microscopy and metrology equipment. Remember seeing a demo of their TEM where they showed an image of a ring of oxygen atoms in some bizarre frozen out structure. Atoms.
QED indeed. 🙂
FEI makes really really *really* nice microscopy and metrology equipment. Remember seeing a demo of their TEM where they showed an image of a ring of oxygen atoms in some bizarre frozen out structure. Atoms.
QED indeed. 🙂
They do indeed. I mostly use Shimadzu and Bruker these days, but had a chance to play with an AFM that an old friend of mine in San Diego built for his lab- really cool technology.
- Status
- Not open for further replies.