Hello. I want to consult you and give me an opinion.
Some time ago I ventured into the vinyl.
I used as Rotel Phono preamps; nad; and I have built accor some DIY seen on the Web, such as P06 Elliott Solidphono TNT, with very good results both, especially the latter.
But as I have no means to measure the accuracy of the RIAA response, I'm still in search of perfection.
I have seen for sale AIWA C50 preamplifier of the '80s, and have seen their technical specifications.
In phono it has specifications that match and exceed the Rotel RQ-970BX.
Rotel as I heard it was on loan and in these latitudes are not achieved, I've thought about buying this pre AIWA to use as phono pre ($ 53).
Are saying ?.
I add that I've been looking to purchase a preamplifier as Pro-ject Phono Box s; Cambridge 551p and really are outweighed by the specifications of this AIWA. But the ear sends, numbers are one thing and the other is the performance ear. Regards.
Some time ago I ventured into the vinyl.
I used as Rotel Phono preamps; nad; and I have built accor some DIY seen on the Web, such as P06 Elliott Solidphono TNT, with very good results both, especially the latter.
But as I have no means to measure the accuracy of the RIAA response, I'm still in search of perfection.
I have seen for sale AIWA C50 preamplifier of the '80s, and have seen their technical specifications.
In phono it has specifications that match and exceed the Rotel RQ-970BX.
Rotel as I heard it was on loan and in these latitudes are not achieved, I've thought about buying this pre AIWA to use as phono pre ($ 53).
Are saying ?.
I add that I've been looking to purchase a preamplifier as Pro-ject Phono Box s; Cambridge 551p and really are outweighed by the specifications of this AIWA. But the ear sends, numbers are one thing and the other is the performance ear. Regards.
An externally hosted image should be here but it was not working when we last tested it.
An externally hosted image should be here but it was not working when we last tested it.
Last edited:
I've thought about buying this pre AIWA to use as phono pre ($ 53).
The price is ok, but it may need refreshing of some internal capacitors. Can you try it first?
If I can prove it. But usually in the point of sale can not be fully appreciated if there is any defect.
If consejan preamplifier that can be good, I'll buy my house and then I'll prove it with time.
Probably have to change some electrolytic capacitor which are aging. But what interests me is the phono section, and there I think is polypropylene capacitors.
Regards.
If consejan preamplifier that can be good, I'll buy my house and then I'll prove it with time.
Probably have to change some electrolytic capacitor which are aging. But what interests me is the phono section, and there I think is polypropylene capacitors.
Regards.
Probably have to change some electrolytic capacitor which are aging. But what interests me
is the phono section, and there I think is polypropylene capacitors.
It's quite possible that the phono stage uses electrolytic coupling capacitors at both the input and output.
You're right. He tended to replace them with similar quality, or film.
I have not got the manual, but looking inside can be seen.
I have not got the manual, but looking inside can be seen.
You're right. He tended to replace them with similar quality,
or film. I have not got the manual, but looking inside can be seen.
Use non-polarized electrolytics when replacing old signal path electrolytics,
since they have lower distortion.
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
- Home
- Source & Line
- Analogue Source
- AIWA C50 PREAMPLIFIER