Vifa TC9FD18-08 best bang for the buck

Somewhat similar to a bipole, I used six TC9FDs in a ring on each of my Cheap Half-Assed Omnidirectional Speakers. I'm very happy with them, though they don't get quite loud enough for me. They've convinced me that omni is worth serious experimentation; I'm planning a new pair, different design. It never ends...

Serious experimentation with 12 Aura NS3 and 2 Peerless 10":

An externally hosted image should be here but it was not working when we last tested it.


Attachment to baffle probably not as difficult as with your build.
 
Fresh upload:

Radial and Woofers.jpg

and a distortion plot:

radmid random rotation thd.png
 
They do look pretty nice - the paper cone is treated with a satin coating that has a nice look - probably part of the reason it sounds so smooth. The only thing I wished they did was to mount the foam gasket on the back rather than the front.

BTW, there's a third lesser-known sibling to the TC9 and TG9 siblings - a woven Kevlar-cone 6-ohm 30W unit from Tymphany (which is the OEM for both the TC9 and TG9 also):

Tymphany TYPY03W06O0111 3-1/2" Full Range Driver


An externally hosted image should be here but it was not working when we last tested it.


It hasn't generally been available since 2009, but surplus lots do surface from time to time. It's similar to the TG9 in overall sonics, but with slightly higher Fs (123 Hz vs. 110 Hz of the TG9). I've tried it in a folded MLTL similar to the Tabaq, and it works (you lose a bit in the lows, and gain in the mids):

An externally hosted image should be here but it was not working when we last tested it.


Of course, it also works in small sealed enclosures for HT/satellite use, which may have been the original market for these beauties - the mid-range/vocals are worth dying for, as I hinted earlier:

An externally hosted image should be here but it was not working when we last tested it.
 
Last edited:
Just yesterday i dug out my set of 4 of these and went about looking at putting these in a box.

The high Q pushed me to a minimum 5 litre sealed box. Basically you want to put it into as big a box as possible. Sealed or aperiodic.

As box size goes up response won't change much from the sealed 5.5 litre we will put these in for testing. F3 about 105, F6 90, F10 low 70s. Using PE posted numbers (Madisounds make for a worse case)

In a FAST this should really have a higher XO. I'd suggest above 250 Hz.

XRK probably has the most experience with these.

dave

Any listening impressions from your setups yet?
 
Is the top end decent on those Kevlar coned Vifa's? I noticed PE had them cited for 123 to 10500 Hz.

Parts Express said:
Specifications: • Power handling: 30 watts RMS/50 watts max • VCdia: 3/4" • Le: 0.46 mH • Impedance: 6 ohms • Re: 4.4 ohms • Frequency response: 123-10,500 Hz • Fs: 123 Hz • SPL: 84 dB 1W/1m • Vas: 0.04 cu. ft. • Qms: 3.12 • Qes: 1.36 • Qts: 0.95 • Xmax: 2.5 mm • Dimensions: Overall diameter: 3-7/8" diagonally, 3-5/16" across flats, Cutout diameter: 3", Depth: 1-11/16".

That spec would make them more of an extended midrange speaker...
Any measurements to be found around the net?
 
Is the top end decent on those Kevlar coned Vifa's? I noticed PE had them cited for 123 to 10500 Hz.

That spec would make them more of an extended midrange speaker...
Any measurements to be found around the net?

It's a matter of subjective opinion - My hearing acuity probably doesn't extend beyond 12 kHz, maybe lower, so I find its highs perfectly adequate. Others may want a small helper tweeter or similar, crossed high (maybe 10 KHz).

The mids are indeed its strongest point - vocals are a standout.

Actual measurements from sample units: I've shipped a few units to folks with Speaker measuring setups, so there will hopefully be some measured numbers in a few weeks.
 
I've noticed that this one also seems to exist. Four ohms, steel frame, looks like it doesn't have the HF extension of the 8 ohm plastic version.

Fs is also much higher at 175 Hz - compared to the polymer-basket versions which range from about 110 to 123 Hz, which comfortably allows quarter-wave MLTLs with bass extension below 60 Hz.

The application is explicitly stated to be Line Arrays, but some kind of subwoofer-assist seems to be necessary for the steel-basket version.

The paper-cone, polymer-basket TC9FD is probably the best sounding all-rounder, but the Kevlar-cone, polymer-basket TPY03W06o can handle 30W rms at 6 ohms impedance, which is a very versatile spec for small gainclones, Class-A, Class-D, Tripath, line arrays, HT satellites, soundbars, etc.

There is also a 12-ohm, 30W variant called the TPY03W12o0102, which is mainly geared for paired-driver, 60W full-range setups.
 
Lots? Dispersion characteristics and distortion, what else is there?

I don't fell that measured distortion is that important, even thou distortion in the global sense is. Often a multiway will not have as good a dispersion characheristic as a good full-range.

Multiways can go lower & higher & usually play louder than a full-range. They appeal to many humans that like to say "mine is bigger than yours", or more is better.

Personally i think a woofer assisted FR is the best set of compromises between a FR & a multiway if some of the advantages if a multiway fit the mix of compromises that best suit you.

dave